Gottfrid

Oh dear. Seems to me that you have a lot of experience of 15 year old girls, Ralf. How on earth would you be able to post something like that otherwise?

Mmmmm. Seems to me you take so much shortcut, that your are losing the thread. Or maybe it is because you are so annoyed. 😂

So, you think that is the norm and that common so you spout it out here as standard? I am really amazed by the widespread delusion here.

Are you still upset, or is using such foul language the best you can do?

Even if my first comment is vague, according to you, you can still not take info from the second one and later refer to the first. But, yet you did. Very stupid. After the first comment I clearly explain in the second how it was not anybody who was misled, as it has it´s bottom in deeply rooted and unfair Thai traditions. So, you do not have to worry your pretty little head about that I do not remember what I post. The girls were aware of what they were getting into and the consequences of it at 15-16 years of age. They were doing this to save the family and help mum and dad to pay back loans they could not take care of. The girls in question was not coerced into anything as that requires an act of violence or threats. In this case it was the parents that had those threats hanging over them, and they let the girls go ahead and in a dirty way save the family. Something that means exactly what I explained in my second post.

Yeah, but I don´t know if a dismissal of Thaksin´s case is something to post hopefully about. Move Forward, on the other hand, so far seems to be the best option for Thailand.

Ok, but maybe you should have considered to quote my first comment instead of taking one sentence of the second. Do you think that makes more sense? As you couldn´t even understand that, I see your replies as utter garbage. Drunk in a bar perhaps? No one notice you, and you just have to play with the phone. 😂

What in the world has 10 year old girls to do with this? I don´t see the meaning with your reply, as I also started my post with the below. Did you just have a bad Saturday? Instead of replying to the whole post, you just took one single sentence out of context and made it what you wanted it to be. Seems like you did not only miss the point, but the whole meaning of my post.

That´s kind of a crazy comment. What is best? Land when you have a signal for a problem before it´s time to land in the right place, or wait and see if the problem was temporary and land when it´s time. If the problem is not temporary, it will show in both places, and it will be same hard to land in both places. Waiting in this case, only have the possibility to be a win. The loss will be same in either of the situations.

Your problem of paying a higher price was solved. Or was it no meaning with your post?

Yeah, but it does say. The emergency light is said to be for the landing gear. That was the thing that got me going, as I know nothing else can be connected to the closed circuit that handles the oil and pressure system connected to the landing gear.

Possible reason, but good that you checked. There are lots of stuff going on online. Can never be sure of anything without checking. 🙂

You have repeated this a couple of times now. Everyone is trying to tell you how to deal with it. No one can say absolutely for sure how they got you card info. It can be a various of ways. You can have walked by someone who had gadgets that can scan your card info. You have made payment online, and one of the systems you payed at have been hacked. Your computer can be hacked, and exploits have been sending your card info and passwords to the hacker. You have made a purchase with the card in a shop or restaurant and your info have been stolen. That´s just 4 of a 100rd ways to get card info. Now lay it to rest and take the advices you have been given.

Then let your TGF order what you need. Problem solved! 🙂 Yeah, they are really mean to you.

No there are not, as they abolished the need to remake TM30 when travelling inside and even outside the country if the main address remains the same. It´s them, that should tell the hotels to ask us if we want them to make a TM30 of your stay. Until they change that again it´s only talk from them and can not lead to a legal fine.

Calm down little bit now, you might burst a vein.

Do you like waffles?

I know, it´s hard, but I try to stay positive.

So, there is no second guessing, as the landing gear was not to be used before time for landing. If land directly or when scheduled will give the same result. I am pretty sure it will not stand to land immediately, if a report of faulty landing gear if received.

So, if it was an act, is that anything different than the constant acting in all areas of other parties?

Thanks! Now it all makes sense again. 😂

I might have gone with that as well. However, if the signal shows the landing gear is not working, then the scenario would be a landing without wheels, that´s the signal he got, and as a pilot he will know that is the most bad that can happen regarding landing gear system as it is a closed circuit of a plane and does not affect other parts.

I will just refer to my earlier post.

You might be, and that is your right. However, you make much more sense than the news. 🙂

Yeah, but it ain´t that bad as long as it looks good and the pig is slim, well trained and firm.