Will B Good

There's a lot going on prepping the ground for disruptive appeals the moment "it appears" he has lost. All hell will break loose.....even if only in the courts.

Ooooo...green is not a color that suits you.

Forum rules.....you are not to enquire into other members personal circumstances

"pls refrain from using the lords name in vain as well"......now that is funny.

What do you imagine...."If no evidence of cheating" means?........that's rhetorical.

I don't believe in magic I don't believe in I-Ching I don't believe in Bible I don't believe in tarot I don't believe in Hitler I don't believe in Jesus I don't believe in Kennedy I don't believe in Buddha I don't believe in mantra I don't believe in Gita I don't believe in yoga I don't believe in kings I don't believe in Elvis I don't believe in Zimmerman I don't believe in Beatles

Post of the day in my book.

I think you're wrong. I'm sure he had a PEP in mind all along, detected the smoke and put it into action without fear nor favour.

...but when Trump says it....oh boy, he means it!!!.....555

"and the loony left woke agenda".....oh.... and you were doing so well up to that point.

If you think...... "Finally, a sensible answer"....... was sarcasm I need to look up the definition.

On fire.....and no dog to save me.

Are you sure it wasn't sarcasm?

I guess it is in the nature of the beast......555

What a truly pathetic and child like comment......do really think I am going to spend days researching a topic I know little about in order to counter ridiculous statements from the hard of thinking on this forum.....grow up.

Wind turbines are generally considered highly effective for reducing carbon emissions. 1. Carbon Payback Time: The carbon payback period for wind turbines—the time it takes for a turbine to offset the carbon emissions produced during its manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and eventual decommissioning—typically ranges from six months to a year, depending on the turbine model and location. This is significantly shorter than the turbine’s operational lifespan, which often exceeds 20 years. After this period, the energy produced is virtually carbon-neutral. 2. Manufacturing and Installation Emissions: Wind turbine production and installation involve emissions, primarily from the steel, concrete, and other materials used in their construction. While this initial carbon cost can be high, it is considerably lower than fossil fuel-based energy sources. Studies have found that even accounting for these emissions, wind power emits only about 11-14 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity, far lower than coal (820 g CO₂/kWh) or natural gas (490 g CO₂/kWh). 3. Maintenance and End-of-Life: Wind turbines have minimal ongoing carbon emissions during operation since they do not require fuel combustion. End-of-life considerations, like recycling turbine blades, are a current environmental challenge. However, recycling initiatives and innovations are in development to minimize the environmental footprint at this stage. 4. Offsetting Fossil Fuels: Each megawatt-hour of wind power generated displaces carbon emissions from fossil fuels, providing a long-term reduction in greenhouse gases. Countries with significant wind energy capacity, such as Denmark and Germany, have documented substantial drops in their national carbon footprints due to wind power’s displacement of coal and gas. Overall, wind turbines offer a low-carbon, renewable energy solution that contributes to carbon neutrality and is essential to global decarbonization efforts. Though challenges exist (especially related to materials and recycling), advances in technology and policy continue to improve the sustainability of wind energy .

"I am left leaning in my political view".......555

Do I know all their names? Have I got their previous addresses?

As everyone knows................ all generalisations are rubbish....(that's a joke).

Goddek is a swivel eyed loon....... https://www.panaccindex.info/p/profile-simon-goddek-fafo-award-winner

Only to be located in remote areas, otherwise they cause cancer in sharks and electrocute birds.

Hard to imagine how you could defame Trump.....but anyway.... The level of fault required for defamation depends on whether the plaintiff is a public or private figure: • For public figures (celebrities, politicians), the standard is actual malice, meaning the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth. So I doubt any action re: defamation would be successful.

I assume it is quite slow as someone has to go through them all and remove both votes for Trump.

Half?.....Only 72 million surely?.......maybe only 65 million if you don't count all the false ballot papers

Yes, some Jewish people supported Hitler and the Nazi Party. Early in the Nazi movement, a small number of Jewish Germans hoped that aligning with certain nationalist or anti-Communist aspects of the party might protect their status in Germany or keep them from persecution. Some members of the Verband nationaldeutscher Juden (Association of German National Jews), led by Max Naumann, advocated for Jewish assimilation into German society and even supported aspects of Nazi ideology, including nationalism and a strong Germany. They believed that their loyalty and service to Germany would be recognized, mistakenly thinking that Hitler’s antisemitism was more about rhetoric than policy.