Will B Good

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/6h8GCzqg Straight from the heart (in a blind panic)......obviously no teleprompter...NOT......555

Oh! So he's taking out Trump supporters in the rubbish truck?......I see.....pure genius.

Trump taking out the Puerto Rico. What genius on his team thought this would be a good photo shoot the day after......?

Well that should compensate for all the people they've eaten.......555

Doesn't sound much different to temples, village heads, local markets, funerals, weddings or 'special' prayer days..........what's the fuss?

Looks like they might fly direct to LHR, but use Qatar for LGW....???

Don't feel like you're just be flushing your life away?

Flush

Just looked mid Jan, return mid Feb....LGW to BKK direct, hand luggage only.....BKK to LGW one connection......with luggage?? Cheapest around £890.....so not much different to Emirates or Qatar

Sure I was there and saved the clip. It must be on my Amazon account......hold your breath whilst I find it.

Have you read the forum rules? You are not allowed to enquire about someone's personal circumstances. Haven't lived there for 30 years.

Ruin his life.....5555......calm down dear......it was a perfectly relevant question considering the setting.

Not so sure...but thanks....555

I wish

In 2016, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump suggested in an interview that there should be “some form of punishment” for women who have abortions if the procedure were to be banned. This statement was made during a town hall interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. When pressed for clarification, Trump initially responded that women could face punishment, although he did not specify what kind. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html

For once? I've been married to an Italian, Serbian and a Thai for 40 years of my life.....I'm not too sure I have ever been right once. (You have to join that site to watch).

Unless you are both hugely in favour of another child then it is more than likely going to lead to a disaster. Not having one could also lead to a disaster but at least there won't be some poor kid stuck in the middle of it all.

Hardly the same, would you not agree.........? Hunter Biden recently defied a congressional subpoena that required him to appear for a closed-door deposition regarding his business dealings. Instead, he publicly stated that he would only testify in a public setting, arguing that closed-door sessions could lead to selective leaks and manipulation of his statements. He expressed frustration with the Republican investigators, claiming they did not want an open process where his answers could be scrutinized by the public

You might enjoy this if you haven't seen it before.

Dross......stop using YouTube as your evidence it's embarrassing. Craig Houston commented on the Southport stabbings and claimed to have linked them to terrorism, although he did not present verified evidence directly connecting the incident to organized terror networks. Following the attack, authorities found extremist material and toxic substances in the suspect’s possession, leading to additional terrorism-related charges. However, Houston’s claims are mostly speculative, with misinformation around the case further complicating public perception. Official statements suggest police are handling the incident carefully, given public concerns about accuracy and safety.

Oh the irony.....making a statement like that then posting a gif.....embarrassing.

Just in case you think these subpoenas are issued willy nilly here are the requirements.... U.S. congressional select committees have the authority to issue subpoenas under powers granted by the Constitution and established through various laws and precedents. Specifically, this authority stems from the implied powers of Congress under the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 1) and Supreme Court rulings affirming that congressional committees have investigative powers necessary to fulfill their legislative functions. Key grounds for issuing a subpoena include: 1. Legislative Purpose: A select committee may issue a subpoena if the information sought is relevant to an area where Congress has legislative power. This might include gathering information for drafting, amending, or repealing laws. 2. Oversight and Investigation: Committees are empowered to investigate federal agencies, actions of public officials, or other matters that affect public policy. This authority is essential for Congress to fulfill its oversight responsibilities. 3. Public Interest and National Security: In certain cases, such as inquiries related to public health or national security, committees have wide latitude to issue subpoenas as these areas often involve urgent matters affecting public welfare. 4. Scope of Inquiry: The information requested must be pertinent to the committee’s stated purpose and scope of inquiry. Committees cannot issue subpoenas for unrelated information or as a tool of harassment. For enforcement, committees can seek court intervention if a subpoena is ignored. Courts typically uphold the subpoena if it serves a legitimate legislative purpose and respects the limits of Congress’s authority .

So anyone should, in your opinion, be allowed to ignore a subpoena if they don't fancy it.......and there should be no consequences......you're happy to run with that?

It's called politics.

It would seem eminently sensible to involve the 'terror police' (not to sure what that means or who they are) from the start......it would not have been sensible, without the evidence they now possess, to call it a terrorism offence at the time....how can you not see that? Being proved 'correct' after an event does not demand/require an apology (not sure from whom to whom) in anyway or form.