Will B Good

Never said she hadn't...???

Yep, the deluded Republican voters who would vote for a corpse if it was (sic) orange. They need to put the interests of the country before blind loyalty to a disturbed, early onset individual.

Kamala Harris has not been accused of plagiarism in the same way that some other political figures have faced allegations. However, there was one notable incident in 2020 where Harris was accused of borrowing elements of a personal story that resembled one told by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Is that all you have? Melania Trump was accused of plagiarism in July 2016, during her speech at the Republican National Convention (RNC), where she delivered a speech supporting her husband, Donald Trump, who was the Republican nominee at the time. The accusations arose because parts of her speech very closely resembled a speech given by Michelle Obama at the 2008 Democratic National Convention (DNC). Plagiarism....the sincerest form of flattery.

I doubt it....most people on here are now use to unsubstantiated claims (lies)..... pure rhetoric in the absence of any sensible, well constructed argument.

So you agree....she never claimed the election was stolen.....thank you.

Tell me you never gave him a lift back.....

Why try to smuggle drugs......a tad dangerous at the best of times.....from one country to another?.......why not just sell them where you are? Is there no market in Thailand for H, or are the profits so astronomical in Nigeria they are prepared to take the risk?

Not very successfully....need to up their game to steal the next one. The balance between Democrats and Republicans has been relatively even, though each party has had periods of dominance. Republicans held the presidency for 20 out of the 28 years between 1980 and 2008, while Democrats have won more frequently in recent elections.

Whilst Clinton has expressed frustration with the external factors that influenced the election outcome, she has never claimed that the election was “stolen” in any legal or procedural sense.

How is he talking about the 'nanny-state and regulations' when the whole discussion is about the BBC?

Presumably only by the Dems though?.......hence the extra 8.2 million votes last time.....that's a lot of stuffing.

Oh boy.....would not want to be the editor on that number.....could take days.

Why are most movies released post-2000 unwatchable? Because they (have to?) cater for and are tailored toward the American market.

So Trump is going ahead with the 60 Minutes interview?

I kind of hope she has run away with her father or even been abducted by him......rather than a complete stranger.

Can't wait to see how that pans out......555

If it does it looks like they'll be using Bumrungrad for treatment.

Just to confirm....is this the "utter balloons' to which you are referring..... Yes, there is substantial evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election with the goal of assisting Donald Trump. This evidence has been outlined in several government reports, investigations, and intelligence assessments. The most notable findings come from the U.S. Intelligence Community, the Mueller Report, and the Senate Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report. Key Findings on Russian Interference: 1. U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) - January 2017: The U.S. intelligence agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA) released a joint assessment concluding with high confidence that Russia, under the direction of President Vladimir Putin, interfered in the 2016 election to undermine confidence in the democratic process, harm Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and help Donald Trump win. They cited: • Cyberattacks on Democratic targets: Russian hackers, primarily from the group known as Fancy Bear (linked to Russia’s military intelligence, the GRU), hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, which were then leaked to the public through platforms like WikiLeaks. • Social media disinformation: Russia’s Internet Research Agency (IRA) engaged in a wide-ranging social media campaign to spread disinformation, promote divisive content, and support Trump’s candidacy while attacking Clinton. 2. The Mueller Report - April 2019: Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation detailed two main efforts by Russia to influence the 2016 election: • Hacking and leaking operations: The GRU hacked Democratic emails, which were then strategically released to hurt Clinton and help Trump. • Social media manipulation: The Internet Research Agency ran thousands of fake social media accounts and groups to spread pro-Trump, anti-Clinton messaging, aiming to exacerbate political and social divisions in the U.S. However, the report did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, though it did document multiple contacts between Trump associates and individuals linked to Russia. The report also outlined instances where Trump campaign officials sought to benefit from Russia’s actions, such as Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with a Russian lawyer promising “dirt” on Clinton. 3. Senate Intelligence Committee Report - 2020: A five-volume report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee largely confirmed the findings of the intelligence community and Mueller. It highlighted Russia’s interference and pointed out the Kremlin’s intent to assist Trump. It also described the Trump campaign’s willingness to accept and exploit the foreign assistance, though it stopped short of concluding there was an explicit agreement (conspiracy) between the campaign and Russia. The committee report emphasized the role of Paul Manafort, Trump’s campaign chairman, who had extensive connections to Russian-aligned individuals. Manafort provided internal campaign polling data to a Russian intelligence officer, Konstantin Kilimnik, which raised significant concerns about potential coordination. Conclusion: While there is substantial evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 election with the intent to help Donald Trump, the investigations did not establish that the Trump campaign criminally conspired with Russia. The interference took several forms, including cyberattacks, the release of stolen emails, and a vast disinformation campaign. The fact that the Trump campaign sought to benefit from these actions, though not proven to be a criminal conspiracy, has been a subject of ongoing political and legal debate.

Brilliant.....post of the day for me.

Many a true post made in jest.

Can't get my wife to wear makeup.....not that she needs to...but a tiny bit of eyeliner.....oh boy!!! Doesn't smoke (tobacco), doesn't drink, no tattoos, no piercings......feel like I'm missing out.

I'm confused.....I thought Trump is America's Hitler.....now it's Vance????

Maybe Trump could build a dam and make the Germans pay for it?

Am I missing something here?........What was/is the RTP's involvement in this unfolding ...likely to be.....tragedy?

Another tough outing for Mr Trump?? Donald Trump spoke at a Georgia town hall on Tuesday to address women’s issues - it turned out the “town” was populated by only GOP backers hand-selected by Fox News. Trump held a “town hall” to talk women’s issues, but only GOP backers were there - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-town-hall-women-georgia-b2629936.html