Will B Good

Have you read the forum rules? You are not allowed to enquire about someone's personal circumstances. Haven't lived there for 30 years.

Ruin his life.....5555......calm down dear......it was a perfectly relevant question considering the setting.

Not so sure...but thanks....555

I wish

In 2016, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump suggested in an interview that there should be “some form of punishment” for women who have abortions if the procedure were to be banned. This statement was made during a town hall interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. When pressed for clarification, Trump initially responded that women could face punishment, although he did not specify what kind. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html

For once? I've been married to an Italian, Serbian and a Thai for 40 years of my life.....I'm not too sure I have ever been right once. (You have to join that site to watch).

Unless you are both hugely in favour of another child then it is more than likely going to lead to a disaster. Not having one could also lead to a disaster but at least there won't be some poor kid stuck in the middle of it all.

Hardly the same, would you not agree.........? Hunter Biden recently defied a congressional subpoena that required him to appear for a closed-door deposition regarding his business dealings. Instead, he publicly stated that he would only testify in a public setting, arguing that closed-door sessions could lead to selective leaks and manipulation of his statements. He expressed frustration with the Republican investigators, claiming they did not want an open process where his answers could be scrutinized by the public

You might enjoy this if you haven't seen it before.

Dross......stop using YouTube as your evidence it's embarrassing. Craig Houston commented on the Southport stabbings and claimed to have linked them to terrorism, although he did not present verified evidence directly connecting the incident to organized terror networks. Following the attack, authorities found extremist material and toxic substances in the suspect’s possession, leading to additional terrorism-related charges. However, Houston’s claims are mostly speculative, with misinformation around the case further complicating public perception. Official statements suggest police are handling the incident carefully, given public concerns about accuracy and safety.

Oh the irony.....making a statement like that then posting a gif.....embarrassing.

Just in case you think these subpoenas are issued willy nilly here are the requirements.... U.S. congressional select committees have the authority to issue subpoenas under powers granted by the Constitution and established through various laws and precedents. Specifically, this authority stems from the implied powers of Congress under the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 1) and Supreme Court rulings affirming that congressional committees have investigative powers necessary to fulfill their legislative functions. Key grounds for issuing a subpoena include: 1. Legislative Purpose: A select committee may issue a subpoena if the information sought is relevant to an area where Congress has legislative power. This might include gathering information for drafting, amending, or repealing laws. 2. Oversight and Investigation: Committees are empowered to investigate federal agencies, actions of public officials, or other matters that affect public policy. This authority is essential for Congress to fulfill its oversight responsibilities. 3. Public Interest and National Security: In certain cases, such as inquiries related to public health or national security, committees have wide latitude to issue subpoenas as these areas often involve urgent matters affecting public welfare. 4. Scope of Inquiry: The information requested must be pertinent to the committee’s stated purpose and scope of inquiry. Committees cannot issue subpoenas for unrelated information or as a tool of harassment. For enforcement, committees can seek court intervention if a subpoena is ignored. Courts typically uphold the subpoena if it serves a legitimate legislative purpose and respects the limits of Congress’s authority .

So anyone should, in your opinion, be allowed to ignore a subpoena if they don't fancy it.......and there should be no consequences......you're happy to run with that?

It's called politics.

It would seem eminently sensible to involve the 'terror police' (not to sure what that means or who they are) from the start......it would not have been sensible, without the evidence they now possess, to call it a terrorism offence at the time....how can you not see that? Being proved 'correct' after an event does not demand/require an apology (not sure from whom to whom) in anyway or form.

And the 'clip'....can you post it please?

"Truly unbiased (or less biased) MSM outlets should refrain from endorsing anyone". You presumably feel newspapers during previous historic moments should not really have commented on Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Johnson......for fear of being seen as biased? Don't you just hate free speech.

1. Napoleon Bonaparte: Napoleon was around 5 feet 6.5 inches (169 cm) tall. He is often considered shorter due to a mix-up between French and English measurements and his nickname “Le Petit Caporal” (The Little Corporal), which referred to his rank rather than his height. 2. Adolf Hitler: Hitler was about 5 feet 8 inches (173 cm), making him of average height for German men at the time. 3. Joseph Stalin: Stalin was approximately 5 feet 5 inches (165 cm) tall. He was notably shorter than many of his peers, but his strong persona and influence made up for his smaller stature. 4. Pol Pot: Pol Pot, leader of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, stood around 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm), making him relatively tall among his Southeast Asian contemporaries.

..........because he came from a settled, Christian family in Wales..........that being the case why would anyone in a position of responsibility jump on the TR bandwagon with no evidence and start screaming TERRORIST on the off chance they would be found to be correct at a later date?

Genius has its limits, but stupidity knows no bounds. What on Earth are farmers supposed to do? If they deliver burned sugarcane it is to be rejected. If they deliver unburned sugarcane what do these idiots think the farmers will do with the leaves????? As a 'family' we have around a 1000 rai of sugarcane......the leaves will be burned this harvest....end of. The only solution is to harvest the leaves either in the field, which farmers will not do....or much easier....force the sugar processors to harvest the leaves by making them accept sugarcane and leaves intact. Harvesting in the field will simply not happen.....the leaves will be burned.

Why are Donald Trump/Boris Johnson/Viktor Orban/Vladimir Putin so popular??? Can anyone, logically, explain their popularity? An electorate that can't think for themselves?

So the police should have said he was a terrorist BEFORE they had any evidence. Glad you're not a detective.

....and neither does Trump.

Most minor common assault cases don’t result in pre-court detention, especially if it’s a first offense or there are no aggravating factors. So you didn't read that bit?

yiu?