proton

Cut down on his booze bill though

19 years not 25 and they have done very little apart from bigging themselves up as canine super heroes. I don't recall seeing any dogs in Phuket in 1997, why trust their numbers anyway when they will not even discuss the stray population? It really is a case of peeing in the wind. My action plan- mass culling for several months nationwide.

As long as there are no dogs jumping about and licking peoples faces!

Got one, they are directional and only work close up, also while they have some effect it tends to wear off and even makes some dogs bark more. Ultrasonics don't affect adults, as far as I know. Lets hope one gets invented that works.

Exactly, it would end suffering instead of prolonging it just to make people feel good.

No! No! No! Sister in law lives on a nice Sansiri estate, no real garden area the usual strip of land at the side and rear. Recently a man moved in nearby with over 30 dogs, never heard anything like it, just a wall of sound and not a nice one. He claimed it was his right to have as many as he wanted. Seems nobody could do anything about it despite many residents complaints. TIT.

Dogs just want feeding they are no different from any other animal, and less intelligent than some others. 24 dogs must cause a real racket, dogs are not capable of human emotions like LOVE, stop the food and see how much they love you!

Culling does work if done properly, still waiting for the information from you re the cull in Bangkok you made claims about. The Phuket example is non applicable to the country as a whole.

Ok oh wise and all knowing one lets have the dates, operation, areas covered and the outcome of this Bangkok cull you claim to know all about

No problem burning them and no need for live fire, knock out darts, then slot and incinerate, and keep up the effort for months.

when was the last cull in Bangkok and what did that involve? The evidence is clear the soi dog approach does not work, I can see that every time we drive home or go to the shops

Another myth from the dog propaganda department, how can they be replaced if most are dead?

How do you kill them? get the army to shoot them and burn the bodies, also offer a bounty of 50 baht a dead dog handed in as an incentive for the locals, morals go out of the window when money is on the table. Time to stop the sentimental nonsense and to get tough. The soi dog foundation has never been the answer. They always cite Phuket where they started as a success, they have not been a success on the mainland and will not even talk about the soi dog population and how it has grown. Gandhi is the last person to go to for advise on morals, he believed in eating meat so was another hypocrite on animal welfare

Dead dogs don't breed or populate roads and doorways, plus all the other things these dirty mutts get up to.

No they are all as worthy as each other, it's the meat eaters who think dogs are more worthy, even soi dogs than the ones they scoff down, which is odd.

Much nastier, especially the hypocrites who get all soppy about slobbering crafty dogs, while eating other animals far more worthy.

Plants are not 'beings' in no way are the comparable to other mammals. If you see no problem with eating mammals then why not dogs? there is no difference between a pig and a dog, apart from a pig being more intelligent and less likely to kill the baby when you are out of the room.

The oldest apologist excuse for dog attacks- the victim must have provoked the dog, almost as untrue as -there are no bad dogs only bad owners myth. So a baby killed by a dog must have provoked it -by being a baby then? Most dogs will attack if they think they can get away with it, nasty sly animals Plenty of links on this site for unprovoked dog killer incidents

Right, the Buddhist excuse does not hold up as they are all massive meat scoffers and their markets look like an animal lovers nightmare, not to mention cock fighting and other cruelties. The book which cannot be mentioned is a large factor in doing nothing about soi dogs. It's not making a merit or doing good to sterilise and let them continue suffering and being pests.

So you do not love animals then, just dirty, drooling doggies and quite happy to let others kill animals for you so you can eat them.

what do you mean by low grade, seems OK to me and I started smoking in 1969. Not the best but at the price no complaints.

when I got married at the amphur we sat next to another couple doing the paperwork at the desk. They were having an argument as the girl did not want to take his name, we were having an argument as I did not want mine to take my name. Maybe hyphens would have solved it.????

They can still spread disease, they are only vaccinated for rabies. They are still a noise and poo pest as well as a traffic hazard and danger from attacks. The best way to get rid of soi dogs is culling, not skirting around the problem and pretending sterilisation on a minor scale is a solution.

What about other pests like rats and mice, against culling them as well?

So you don't eat meant then?