Skipalongcassidy

Ignorance would not be a legitimate excuse... but if you must... do it. In the mean time I do NOT hate nor am I bigoted toward Palestinians... however, I do not especially like a nation who has done absolutely nothing for the betterment of their own people and blame a different nation for their woes based on a perverted religious/social immorality... it's time for them to move beyond the entrenched mind set and learn that the world is full of diversity and people different from themselves and adapt their behavior rather than demand everyone else to alter their society to fit one that is uncivilized at best.

“has gone crazy in his hatred”... along with the Hateful 8

The workers wolf whistled (or whatever young uncouth men do nowadays) at the girl and she told her brother or cousin or boyfriend... so they came by to kill the swine.

Palestinians don't know the meaning of living in peace... Palestinians oppresses themselves with their hate and bigotry relegating themselves to their poverty and ignorance... what have they proposed to build their community... nothing.

Joe's policies remind me of what the police have become now in most of the world... reactionary after the fact and when seconds count, they are minutes away.

Until there is a fundamental change in attitude (hate and bigotry) toward jews by the muslim arabs nothing will change... most of the western world that has not been infiltrated by arab muslims support letting Israel live in peace...

Isn't it sad that the best and the brightest of the democrat party is trailing Trump in the polls... doesn't speak well does it.

Thank you...

One of your more stupid posts... let's go fight in the schoolyard approach.

You mean their parents and relatives...

Gotcha...

Not universally true... at least not true in Chiang Mai IO

Well... unlike you I am not in the USA so I am not bound by their definition as the gospel truth... There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it.[3][4] Terrorism is a charged term. It is often used with the connotation of something that is "morally wrong". Governments and non-state groups use the term to abuse or denounce opposing groups.[4][5][6][7][8] Varied political organizations have been accused of using terrorism to achieve their objectives. These include left-wing and right-wing political organizations, nationalist groups, religious groups, revolutionaries, and ruling governments.[9] Legislation declaring terrorism a crime has been adopted in many states.[10] State terrorism is that perpetrated by nation states, but is not considered such by the state conducting it, making legality a grey area.[11] There is no consensus as to whether terrorism should be regarded as a war crime.[10][12] Separating activism and terrorism can be difficult and has been described as a 'fine line'.[13]

Talk about cutting one's nose off to spite one's face... OP doesn't want to use the ready made go around that is commonly known for this particular situation... one has to ask, "is it the $10", if so... so sad. The $10 is a travel expense and is so easy and simple... why complicate the situation?

So now that it's defined as you asked for it to be... you have withdrawn into the relax chum mode... so adult of you

Aholes are aholes regardless of nationality... wait until he kills someone then deal with it... seems to be the theme

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of intentional violence and fear to achieve political or ideological aims. The NYT article fits the definition... it was written as it was to incite fear

There's one thing for certain... keep doing the same thing over and over hoping for different results is the definition of insanity... refer democrap voters in USA.

I knew that... not relevant to the subject at hand of $100,000,000.00 to the Palestinians, but true nonetheless...

It an algorithm based on postings...

Why is it relevant... and it is not an honest question... it comes from one of my named Hateful 8 and is asked by him hoping to disparage me in some way... I'm sorry that my answer would disappoint him in that regard.

Again... does it matter so much to you where I fall in the spectrum as to negate what I said... I think that you are the one with a problem... stock up

On Monday, the New York Times admitted that "editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation" of the explosion that occurred at a Gaza hospital last week after the paper "relied too heavily on claims by Hamas." The terrorist organization that rules the Palestinian territory blamed an Israeli airstrike in a story that quickly spread. The lengthy Times editor's note said the initial report "left readers with an incorrect impression" of the events that transpired and said it should have "taken more care" with the presentation of the information and identifying what could be verified. Intentionally lying and embellishing is terrorism when done by a prominent news source... you should be enraged... but then again you are who you are... sad

Does it matter... it doesn't change any part of my observation.

That's my point... thanks... they are reported as fact and are not vetted... it's MSN terrorism... that's the problem... the recent example is The New York Times inciting antisemitism... https://www.nytimes.com › 2023 › 10 › 17 › world › middleeast › gaza-hospital-explosion-israel.html