Skipalongcassidy

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of intentional violence and fear to achieve political or ideological aims. The NYT article fits the definition... it was written as it was to incite fear

There's one thing for certain... keep doing the same thing over and over hoping for different results is the definition of insanity... refer democrap voters in USA.

I knew that... not relevant to the subject at hand of $100,000,000.00 to the Palestinians, but true nonetheless...

It an algorithm based on postings...

Why is it relevant... and it is not an honest question... it comes from one of my named Hateful 8 and is asked by him hoping to disparage me in some way... I'm sorry that my answer would disappoint him in that regard.

Again... does it matter so much to you where I fall in the spectrum as to negate what I said... I think that you are the one with a problem... stock up

On Monday, the New York Times admitted that "editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation" of the explosion that occurred at a Gaza hospital last week after the paper "relied too heavily on claims by Hamas." The terrorist organization that rules the Palestinian territory blamed an Israeli airstrike in a story that quickly spread. The lengthy Times editor's note said the initial report "left readers with an incorrect impression" of the events that transpired and said it should have "taken more care" with the presentation of the information and identifying what could be verified. Intentionally lying and embellishing is terrorism when done by a prominent news source... you should be enraged... but then again you are who you are... sad

Does it matter... it doesn't change any part of my observation.

That's my point... thanks... they are reported as fact and are not vetted... it's MSN terrorism... that's the problem... the recent example is The New York Times inciting antisemitism... https://www.nytimes.com › 2023 › 10 › 17 › world › middleeast › gaza-hospital-explosion-israel.html

HAHA... "breaking news" that's false is a form of terrorism.

Oh no... half the posters on here will not be affected because they don't live in Thailand... half of the remaining half hopefully can plan ahead so they don't get the dt's.

I guess you have been left out of the loop... search it yourself... it's there.

So what... wait for the facts or terrorize with false statements... you are happy to be fed the wrong information quickly rather than the truth a few hours later... no wonder the world is in the state that it's in.

Now it is a 3 step process to delete notifications... hit "delete notifications"... "are you sure"... "confirm"... do we really need all this redundancy to clear out notifications?

It would be even better if the standard were raised that prevented "mistakes" from the press reporting on major worldwide events from being made... like waiting until the facts prove out before stating your opinion as fact only to be wrong

Flat footed JOE... now where do we turn?

Your link requires a paid subscription therefore it is invalid... setting that aside... once again all the liberal lefties who bask in the rhetoric spouted from this source are left stranded in their convictions that Israel was the culprit as the NYTimes originally stated... and how many other times have these same people been led astray by the wrongful reporting of this source

This isn't about Trump... this is about Joe and what is he to do... other than take a vacation that is.

They are not oppressed... they are victims of their hate and bigotry... they refuse to live as decent humans

Joe has been on the wrong end of every foreign policy for 5 decades... why would he change now.

Son of Hamas leader breaks silence on decision to denounce terror group: 'They don't care' about Palestinians... Why don't the Palestinians rebel against Hamas... because the jews are hated more than the terrorists... until they change their stance Palestinians will continue to die.

And the victim never lies... right. She maybe was not vigilant in watching for the call... maybe she didn't recognize the number and ignored the call.. IO is not the bad guy...

That's what she is saying... I have never heard of "unannounced" visits... every one that I have had and every one that I have witnessed was preceded by a phone call... did she miss the call? Did she ignore the call? Did she tell them when they called that she was out and etc etc etc... IO is not the bad guy most of the time... I find them to be accommodating and friendly if they are treated respectfully. Further, no you are not under house arrest... however when you submit your application you are agreeing to make yourself available for a visit on short notice... so wouldn't it make sense to be vigilant and ready to meet... I still don't buy that IO did not reach out and call... it is "she said, they said"

The point is that you are not forced to sign... it's your own choice to work for a company that requires that you do... what part of "freedom" of choice are you missing? If you are "free" to choose whether to sign or not work for a company... exactly where is the abuse?