Red Phoenix

A ChatGPT query learns that > there are parking lots where electric vehicles (EVs) are restricted or prohibited, primarily due to fire safety concerns associated with lithium-ion batteries. These restrictions are more prevalent in certain countries and specific types of parking facilities.koreatimes.co.kr+5timesunion.com+5news.com.au+5 🔥 Fire Safety Concerns Leading to EV Parking Restrictions EV fires, while statistically less frequent than those involving gasoline vehicles, can be more challenging to extinguish and may cause significant damage, especially in enclosed spaces like underground parking lots. This has led to various measures being implemented in different regions: South Korea: Following a significant incident in August 2024 where a Mercedes-Benz EQE EV caught fire in an underground parking lot in Incheon, causing extensive damage and displacing residents, several measures were adopted: The Seoul Metropolitan Government announced plans to restrict EVs charged over 90% from entering underground parking areas in apartment buildings. Some residential complexes and commercial buildings in Seoul and surrounding areas have independently banned EVs from underground parking facilities. Companies like KT and LG Display have prohibited or discouraged EVs from using underground parking at their facilities. koreatimes.co.kr+5wsj.com+5straitstimes.com+5straitstimes.com+3koreatimes.co.kr+3koreajoongangdaily.joins.com+3wapcar.my China: In response to concerns over EV fires, certain hotels and commercial buildings have started banning battery electric vehicles (BEVs) from underground parking. This move, while controversial, is permitted under Chinese laws that hold building owners responsible for fire safety. thetimes.co.uk+12wapcar.my+12news.com.au+12 United States: In Saratoga Springs, New York, a condominium complex implemented a moratorium on parking new EVs in their underground garage due to fire safety concerns. This decision has sparked debate among residents and experts about the actual risks posed by EVs. timesunion.com+1thetimes.co.uk+1 United Kingdom: A father was denied entry to a hospital car park in Liverpool because his EV was considered a fire risk. The hospital cited advice from the local fire service and ongoing sprinkler upgrades as reasons for the temporary restriction. thetimes.co.uk

The Transman once again confirming his reputation as the unbearable obnoxious troll that he is. Exorcizamus te, omnis immundus spiritus, omnis satanica potestas, omnis incursio infernalis adversarii, omnis legio, omnis congregatio et secta ...

For info > EN6204 refers to the batch-number of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 jab. However, a Google search for EN6204 will not give any results, unless you add the word vaccine to your query. Doing a search on the site 'How Bad is My Batch?' shows the number of adverse effects for recipients of that particular batch compared to other batches. And Impulse was unfortunate among the recipients that were administered that particular HOT batch. > https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html?batchCode=EN6204

You can have knowledge about certain conditions, without having actually personally experienced it. E.g. a male gynecologist will never have personal experience of the conditions of his female clientele. But - hopefully - he has broad knowledge and experience in treating those conditions.

Hahaha, asking for proof and then when @dinsdale provides some easily verifiable facts, you dismiss them because 'they were not in the news'. Sure, they are not in the compromised Big Pharma sponsored mainstream news that you seem to be following. This sub-forum provides you with access to alternative non Big Pharma funded news outlets and studies. You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make it drink.

Thanks, if the content does not have your interest, it is still better than popping sleep-pills when you have insomnia.

There are +100 threads in this very sub-forum addressing the harms of the Covid-jabs. Rather than listing all the ones that directly answer your question, I suggest you do your own research which is quite easy by simply looking into the listing of the threads on this sub-forum and accessing the information provided. > https://aseannow.com/forum/466-covidvaccine/

Nobody needs to be concerned when they have a non-compromised immune system and refrained from getting the mRNA Covid-19 jabs. Those jabs cripple your immune system and will cause harm irrespective whether you have inherited 'superior genes' from your parents.

That's because the sequence of choices listed (except for #15, the last one) are to determine 'in which stage of DENIAL you are' regarding the harms of the Covid-vaccines. And you are not in denial, because unfortunately you are personally experiencing the harms of these poison-shots.

Agreed. But demonizing CO2 as the 'solution' to save the planet, and syphon billions of dollars towards funding of CO2 reduction projects that demonstrably would make the livability of the planet WORSE is more than evil. And as usual the world's largest fake philanthropist Bill Gates is pushing some of the madness projects (vaccinating cattle to reduce methane gas from their farts, chopping down entire forests and bury the stems to cut down on CO2, spraying the atmosphere in order to lower temperature by blocking the sun, etc.).

A groundbreaking new study has confirmed that toxic ingredients in “vaccines” cause inflammation and brainstem dysfunction, which trigger Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in sleeping babies. Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080585/ = = = The study, recently published in the International Journal of Medical Sciences, is raising major concerns about the safety of early-life vaccinations for a small but potentially vulnerable group of infants. According to the researchers, underdeveloped liver enzyme systems may hinder some babies from effectively processing “vaccine” ingredients, leading to sudden death. Frank Berman of Slay News, comments on the study > https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/bombshell-study-vaccines-cause-sudden Note that SIDS is not a 'very rare' phenomenon, as the vax-pushers want us to believe. > Statistics from the VAERS database were combined with peer-reviewed research for a groundbreaking new analysis. Alarmingly, the study found that a staggering 78 percent of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of the “vaccines.” Shockingly, 58% of sudden infant deaths occurred within just three days of the injections. In addition, two days post-vaccination shows a 69-fold increase in deaths compared to baseline expectations. The findings were confirmed in six separate peer-reviewed studies.

Of course, air pollution and traffic congestion are not frauds. But the article doesn't claim that these phenomena are frauds. The author of the article would wholeheartedly agree with the common sense view that air pollution is detrimental to your health. The article is not contesting that, but it is about the fable that the amount of CO2 emitted as a result of human activity is triggering global warming. And that is a total scam, but has somehow become the cornerstone of ridiculous Net Zero projects (but very profitable for the scammers, Bill Gates of course being in the frontline here.

The subtitle of the article "Taking Aim at One of the Most Pervasive Lies of the Modern Age" delivers on its promise. Rather than the al too familiar hysterical CO2-bashing, this long but very worthwhile article will be quite useful In case you are open to consider actual facts and real scientific evidence. Source: https://badlands.substack.com/p/the-fraud-of-global-warming My comment: Let me also make it clear that I do not 100% agree with some of the rare but occasional 'political' comments inserted into the text. But the facts addressed in the article still make it very worthwhile and I can fully endorse the author's conclusion that "we should absolve CO2 of its accused sins, and celebrate this wonderful little molecule as our friend and ally".

https://aseannow.com/topic/1362607-amyloid-fibrils-found-in-3-year-old-after-in-utero-mrna-injection-exposure/ Good that the mother got the Covid-19 shot during pregnancy (1 week before giving birth prematurely), otherwise it might have been worse...

Bad

Yes, I checked it. You stated that Campbell is a nobody without any science background. And you responded: = = = And now you are saying that you were referring to the 'radio man' and not Campbell. Looks like you cannot even remember what you wrote 1 hour ago (vax-harm effect?). Truly embarassing...

QED

The 15 stages of mRNA denial (first 10 from the Dossier) 1) It's the cure! 2) It's not the cure but it prevents you from getting it and spreading it to others 3) It doesn't prevent you from getting it but it prevents you from getting sick 4) It doesn't prevent you from getting sick but it prevents you from getting REALLY sick 5) It doesn't prevent you from getting REALLY sick but it prevents you from dying 6) It doesn't prevent you from dying but it prevents most people from dying 7) Hey, it's still a net benefit! Trust the institutions! 😎 Okay, well at least it doesn't actively harm people! Roll up your sleeve for the updated shot 9) Okay, well at least it doesn't harm THAT many people! Sorry, I’m, uh, busy, and not rolling up my sleeve anymore 10) Okay, it's poison, and it doesn’t actually do anything beneficial whatsoever. There are no benefits, only costs. The cure is so much worse than the disease. We got bamboozled every step of the way 11) It's poison but it only kills a few people, and everybody I know is ok 12) Well, I know a few people that were killed or maimed but it's pretty much all over now 13) Ok, more and more people are dying, but it will stop when these greedy pharma companies are reined in 14) It's true that the military has orchestrated the whole thing but its only because they want to better prepare us for an era of biological warfare 15) Its really a transnational deep state that fears the 99% so much that they have set out to kill all 99% Source: Repost of YetAnotherTommy's comment on Michel Chossudovsky's excellent substack article "Both the Lockdown and the “Vaccine” Have No Scientific Basis" > https://michelchossudovsky.substack.com/p/both-the-lockdown-and-the-vaccine

Like you are doing in all your comments. Always ad hominem insults never backed up with acts, exact circumstances and details. The ultimate troll...

Wikipedia features a 'character assasination' of dr John Campbell. At the start of the scamdemic, dr Campbell was praised and mentioned for his efforts to explain in plain english the jist of important peer-reviewed articles on Covid-19. But over time he turned from a 'believer' into a critic, as he was confronted with all the inconsistencies and obfuscations in those publications. And to his credit, he kept on reporting and was not afraid to ask the awkward questions. That independent stance resulted in him being admired as a science-darling almost overnight into a 'anti-vaxxer quack'. The Wikipedia article does feature Campbell's education and career. and @newbee2022's hyperbole that Campbell is 'just a nobody without any science background' - is not confirmed by the facts. > John Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator who has made videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Early life and education John Lorimer Campbell[5] grew up primarily in the Stanwix district of Carlisle.[6] He holds a diploma in nursing from the University of London, a BSc in biology from the Open University, an MSc in health science from the University of Lancaster, and a Ph.D. in nursing from the University of Bolton.[6] He received the Ph.D. for his work on developing methods of teaching via digital media such as online videos.[7] Career Campbell worked as a nursing educator at the University of Cumbria, and has experience as an emergency department nurse.[8] He has also tutored healthcare workers in Cambodia and India.[8] He is the author of the nursing-related bioscience textbooks Campbell's Physiology Notes and Campbell's Pathophysiology Notes. A review in Emergency Nurse magazine said that the latter textbook contained "excellent [and] inexpensive notes on the causes, pathophysiological changes, and clinical features seen in disease processes".[9] In 2008, he established a YouTube channel to provide educational lectures on topics in health science and nursing.[10]

No, it's not a typo - it's the Bolus Theory as advocated for a couple of years now by dr Marc Girardot. Do read the article explaining the common sense background of Girardot's view on vaccine harm > https://drkevinstillwagon.substack.com/p/the-needles-secret

A diet of Junk food will indeed jeopardize your health. No question about that. But that is kid's stuff compared with injecting 29 cocktails of poisonous stuff in pre-kindergarten infants to protect them from low-risk (actually immune enhancing) short illnesses. The main thing protected by the vaccines are the profits of the Vax industry and all their cronies. E.g. some insurance companies and HMOs (like Blue Cross Blue Shield) do have performance-based incentive programs, sometimes referred to as "Pay for Performance" (P4P). These programs reward practices for meeting certain benchmarks — vaccination rates among patients may be one of many metrics. For example: A practice may receive a year-end bonus if, say, 80% or more of eligible patients are fully vaccinated. So parents with doubts about the shots need to be convinced of their usefulness, to safeguard the practice's blood-money bonus.

In the same spirit one can ask: Who should I believe, somebody describing serious adverse effects or his health nose-diving after his covid-shot or the Big Pharma funded/sponsored scientist/researcher/doctor trying to convince use that there is 'nothing to see here' and that post-jab adverse effects are coincidental or imaginary. If a plumber with a lifetime of experience were to tell you that water runs uphill, you would know he is lying and that the lie is not accidental. But in medical matters a lie is not so easily spotted especially when it is packed in jargon that only those educated in that jargon are fully able to grasp. So ultimately you need to take responsibility for your own health (like @rumak is doing). And that requires a more than fair amount of common sense, trusting your inner compass and of course doing your own research (in a sense of not blindly accepting what figures of authority claim).

To answer your question > The case background speaks for itself, so I repost it here: 2. Case Background The child was born prematurely at 35 weeks gestation, one week after the mother’s second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) mRNA vaccine. The child was delivered without vital signs and required emergency resuscitation. The severe temporal correlation suggests a significant adverse maternal-fetal reaction. Over the subsequent three years, the child experienced recurrent immune dysfunction, including tonsillectomy and multiple surgeries for persistent middle ear infections. An unusual frequency of common infectious illnesses and impaired immune responses prompted further investigation into systemic pathologies. Whole blood samples were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy with Thioflavin T (ThT) staining and SEM. In both imaging modalities, fibrillar structures with amyloid characteristics were identified.

Want me to copy the post here in which you revealed that immediately after your Covid-19 shot you developed a bout of shingles?