Red Phoenix

You can simply fly to Thailand without a Visa and will on entry receive a Permission to stay for 30 days. No problem, as you will be leaving for Singapore before the end of that Permission to stay. For your return to Thailand from Singapore you will also not need a Visa as you will be stamped in again for a Permission to stay for 30 days. Note that you should buy the flight-ticket to Singapore prior to your trip to Thailand as the airline will want to see that outward bound ticket to Singapore, when checking in on your flight to Thailand. Thailand requires people entering VisaExempt (without a Visa) to have an outward-bound ticket prior to the expiry of the 30-day Permission to stay you will receive on entry, and it are the airlines flying you into Thailand that will check whether you meet that condition.

Lol > From now on I will ask you for links to the peer-reviewed evidence of any opinion that you post. ????

I clicked the link for the 'Full Story' as well as the link to the study published in Nature (which provides only the Abstract, as the study is accessible for paid subscribers only). But nowhere in that Full Study or Abstract on 'long covid' do the researchers address the results from a covid-vaccinated/non-vaccinated angle. I do not deny the possibility that long covid can be the result of having contracted covid. But a study that does not take into account in its analysis that 'long covid' symptoms might be the adverse affects of covid-vaccination, belongs in the dustbin...

Thanks for response. #2 - And it seems the attendance by a witness/neighbour during first time of Application for the 1-year extension of stay for reason of MARRIAGE, is indeed required by some Imm Offices (luckily a minority). #1 - But the requirement to ALSO provide the 'Certificate of singleness' when applying first time for such 1-year extension, is on top of the Amphur-generated and up-dated 'Still married statement' (Kor-Ror 3) that needs to be provided with every extension application. So I am still puzzled by that 'Singleness certificate' requirement because: > Since you cannot get married in Thailand without providing such proof of not being married abroad (the 'Certificate of singleness'), why would Nonthaburi Imm Office want the applicant to also provide that document, as it dates by definition from before the moment you got married?

I take over this comment from another a thread on this subject, as I think the observation is quite relevant and to the point. DEAR vax-supporters, do you think this stuff is made up by ‘anti-vaxxers’? Do you think that there is not DNA in these tested vials? Or do you think there is DNA but it doesn’t matter and it’s harmless? Or do you know it’s a serious problem but you’re paid peanuts by the industry to troll this type of thing? Are you just indoctrinated incurious sheep with your brains in your arse? Or are you genuinely scared of what you’ve put into your bodies and are in desperate denial? I’d love to know. .

I agree that checking more vials for DNA-contamination would be highly recommended (and I am pretty sure that this is currently taking place). Note that I posted also the results from German professor Konig, who did the analysis on 5 vials and found amounts 80 to 350 times higher than 'allowed' (while the actual allowance should be ZERO).

Thanks, for posting that link. And it seems that Nonthaburi Imm Office indeed requires you to bring a neighbour as witness with you, when applying for the 1-year extension. According to their requirements document, that is only required for very first extension application. But Tonray indicated that the person he knows brings his neighbour every year for the witnessing (and pays him for the inconvenience). Something for my friend to enquire about when doing his initial application...

Thanks for sharing your experience. Looks like the 'witness' requirement has changed since you applied first time back in 2014.

A friend of mine recently entered Thailand on a 90-day Non Imm O Visa for reason of marriage (he was married earlier in Thailand). He went to his Nonthaburi Imm Office for info about what was required to apply for the 1-year extension of stay from his 90-day Non Imm O 'marriage' Visa. Nonthaburi Imm Office provided him with a 1-page document (in Thai language) with their requirements for such application. I have attached below both the Thai Version, as well as a Google-translate rendered version in English (as I cannot read Thai). There are two rather strange requirements in that document. Hence my question whether these are indeed actual requirements. Obviously, response from AN members that similarly applied at the Nonthaburi Imm Office for the 1-year extension of their original Non Imm O 'marriage' Visa would be very welcome. #1 - in clause 4, it states that on top of the Kor 2 (original marriage certificate) and Kor 3 (Amphur-statement of still being married), Nonthaburi Imm Office also requires for the first 1-year extension application to provide the 'Certificate of singleness' as provided by the foreigner's Embassy in order to get married in Thailand. > Since you cannot get married in Thailand without providing such proof of not being married abroad, why would Nonthaburi Imm Office want the applicant to also provide that document? #2 - At the bottom of the requirements it states that for the first 1-year extension application, that the applicant has to be accompanied by a NEIGHBOUR as a witness, and that the neighbour has to bring a copy of his Thai ID-card as well as a copy of his House-book (the latter probably to prove that he is indeed a neighbour). > It's the first time that I come across such requirement, and of course it would save Immigration the effort of having to talk with a neighbour when doing a home-visit to the applicant during the 'under consideration period'. Experience from Nonthaburi applicants for such first time 1-year 'marriage' extension would be appreciated. Note that in clause 4 the english Google-translate machine translation did incorrectly render the Thai word for TWO as "6", So that requirement does not state that the +400.000 THB needs to have been kept on the applicants personal Thai bank-account for 6 months at the moment of applicatin for the extension, but should be read as 2 months as in the original Thai document.

That mRNA doesn't stay local was actually confirmed in one of Pfizer's own research-documents. That document was submitted to the Japanese Health Authorities who required Pfizer to provide it in order to approve their vaccine. Note that Pfizer had not submitted that document to any other Health Authority and did not 'debunk' the fable spread by MSM that the mRNA in the shots stayed at the injection site.

The main issue was whether the mRNA stayed at the injection site as Public Health authorities told us, or whether it was distributed through your body. This Lancet study confirms that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is NOT confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into breast-milk EVs. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00366-3/fulltext?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Before you sable down the above: Yes, the researchers 'believe' (their words) that breastfeeding post-vaccination is safe. And yes, your very specific statement might well be true (no detection of serum in breastfed infants), but the fact that mRNA is NOT confined to the injection site and widely distributed in the body of those that took the shots cannot be denied.

Buckhault is NOT the only scientists/researcher that reported on DNA contamination in the covid-vaccins, but as he is a world-renowned authority in his field his testimony got more clout than the other scientists/researchers reporting on it.

A clear case of back-pedalling under pressure. Buckhaults said “there is a very real hazard” that these fragments of foreign DNA can insert themselves into a person’s own genome and become a “permanent fixture of the cell.” He also said it’s a plausible mechanism for what might be “causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest” in people following mRNA vaccination. And now he tells us in #1 that the risk is 'hypothetical' ... And in #4 of his 6-point statement he writes that "With all the extra attention this issue has gotten last week I am pretty confident that future batches of mRNA vaccines will not have detectable DNA in it." Yep, future batches, NOT the ones that have already been injected in billions of people or the ones that they are currently rolling out. And he is 'pretty confident' that this grave error will not happen anymore. You have his word - for what its worth...

When you are unvaccinated, contract COVID and recover from it (as the majority of people do) you have natural immunity, which is far superior than vaccine-induced immunity. Knowing that the vaccinated can still contract COVID as well as transmit it, and that the jabs harmed their immune-system making them more vulnerable for not only covid but for any infection, the choice seems pretty obvious (not even taking into account the short, middle-term and long-term vaccine adverse effects).

In all the research papers I have seen that tried to determine the answer to the question how long your body's production of spike-proteins goes on after you have taken the mRNA jab, they were not able to give a conclusive answer. The reason being that there were still spike-proteins found at the end of each of those study's time-horizon. So, it's minimum 6 months and possibly for as long as you (still) live...

double

Irrespective whether the Urine-clip is real or fabricated, it's only a joke! ????

All departures at Suvarnabhumi (both international and domestic) are on the 4th floor. Take the escalator (or elevator) and when on 4th floor go left as domestic departures are on row A. Takes less than 10 minutes from arrival hall exit to domestic departure check-in counters.

When you have checked in for your international flight and have your boarding pass, you go to International departures for which there are 2 entrances (zone 1 and zone2), both with security check and Immigration. The Re-Entry Permit desk is situated in zone 2, after security and before being stamped out by Immigration. It's on the far left side in the Immigration stamp-out hall. If you took zone 1 you would need to go some 300 meters to the left after having been stamped out by Immigration and then enter zone 2 from the back to go to the Re-Entry Permit desk where you can still get it (even after having been stamped out already in Zone1).

On the eve of Zelensky's arrival in New York a billboard with Ukranian flag featured a greeting message. But instead of Glory to Ukraine, the flag read Glory to Urine . The company that owns the screen explained that the error was caused by an intelligent system that compared the yellow color with the word Ukraine and automatically corrected it to a similar consonant word - Urine. ~

https://brownstone.org/articles/researchers-alarmed-to-find-dna-contamination-in-pfizer-vaccine/ Quote from the article's introduction: Phillip Buckhaults, a cancer genomics expert, and professor at the University of South Carolina has testified before a South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee saying that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine is contaminated with billions of tiny DNA fragments. Buckhaults, who has a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology, said “there is a very real hazard” that these fragments of foreign DNA can insert themselves into a person’s own genome and become a “permanent fixture of the cell.” He said it’s a plausible mechanism for what might be “causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest” in people following mRNA vaccination. = = = Note that Buckhaults is a staunch fan of the mRNA platform and is fully vaccinated, but he reluctantly addressed the issue at the Committee hearing and made it clear that he would not be taking any boosters before he had personally tested the content of the vial (which only requires a cheap and quick test). Obviously, if the boosters do contain that DNA contamination there is an enormous problem. Not even to mention, all the earlier jabs that were administered containing that DNA contamination. The contamination problem was created when Pfizer upscaled the process for large-scale distribution to the population...

Hope you get your share, stopped raining here some 1 hour ago, but we had rain almost daily for 1-2 hours last week (water reservoir almost overflowing).

Heavy rain now some 150 km South-West from Surin in KhunHan district (SiSaKet province).

Many thanks! It is crystal clear now what he needs to do. A worthwhile alternative could also be for him to exit Thailand without a Re-Entry Permit and apply at the Thai Consulate in Savannakhet for a SingleEntry or MultipleEntry Non Imm O Visa for reason of marriage. In that case I presume he also needs to cancel the Permission to stay from his current Non Imm O ED Visa at his local Imm Office by presenting them with a letter from the school of him terminating the course. At least that's how I interpret UbonJoe's recommendation to avoid being refused exiting Thailand for not being able to provide proof of having followed the Courses that his Non Imm O ED Visa requires him to do.

HI @BritTim > Thanks again for your earlier clear response. I have one additional question: From further information my acquaintance provided, it turns out that he applied for a 90-day Non Imm O ED Visa in his home-country, and that he just re-entered Thailand on that ED Visa. And he now wants to apply for a 1-year extension at his local Imm Office but that extension for a different REASON (marriage as he was married in Thailand last year). Is that possible? Reason for my question being that I know in the case of a Non Imm O-A Visa that you cannot change the reason for your 1-year extension to marriage, when you apply first time for a 1-year extension from such Non Imm O-A Visa, and it is only after having applied for the 1-year extension for reason of retirement based on that Non Imm O-A Visa, that Immigration then allows you for your next extension to switch from retirement to marriage. But maybe that restriction is not applicable when applying for a 1-year extension for reason of marriage in the last month of his 90-day Non Imm O ED Visa. Thanks in advance for any response on this query.