Brickleberry

You are incorrect. One individual is to blame for burning that field. One individual is the solution to that problem - don't burn the goddamn field. The authorities have already put several laws in place - and international agreements between neighboring countries - to prevent this. It is 100% down to individuals like you and me to comply with the law. If we do not, we will face repercussions. If I go crazy later this afternoon and start committing crimes in my city, it is not the fault of the authorities for not preventing me from committing crimes - that would be ridiculous. It is my fault for being an idiot! The same is true for farmers. They have a responsibility to follow the law, as all other citizens do.

You didn't make any points at all. You made quite a few silly guesses about my lifestyle, none of which are true, and none of which relate to my concerns. You seem to be worrying a lot about this farmer's 'Co2 / carbon emissions'. Again, I couldn't care less about his carbon emissions, I care about the toxic fumes and health concerns - as does the majority of the population, each and every year. Why are you so keen to protect this guy who was poisoning his neighbors? Are you a pyromaniac? Do you enjoy breathing in cancerous fumes? Are you a poor farmer who burns his fields in the dead of night?

I couldn't care less about the Farmer's carbon footprint. I do care that he was poisoning everyone with his thoughtless actions. Whilst it is sad that he died, I find it hard to have sympathy with the way he died - it is a sort of poetic justice really.

A farming practice that is outdated don't you mean? Western nations do not do this, why is it acceptable for Thai farmers? Furthermore, it is against the law for farmers to burn their fields. So no, I don't need to learn how to eat a rock. I would much rather farmers follow the law, and didn't cause cancer and a plethora of other health problems.

She is quite well known in the UK, she is the former home secretary, and a current conservative MP.

How am I misgendering? The OPs username is "herfiehandbag" and the member does not list their gender. It would be logical to assume that a member who has "handbag" in their username might be female!

UN watch was not mentioned in the article, or in your post. You would have to know exactly who Hillel Neuer is to know that he is the Head of UN watch.

Can you quote the part of the article that mentions UN watch? I cannot see it.

There are several Jewish groups on these marches, some are very visible such as the very conservative/traditional Jews that wear the black hats, garb and beards etc. There were 13 Jewish groups marching in London over the weekend. I think this man was trying to cause problems, because there were so many other obviously Jewish people at the march.

You are intentionally misleading the audience. You may wish to disband UNRWA for some idiotic reason, but do try to be honest next time and at least show a video of actual evidence, or even a video that contains the evidence you claim to have. This video (I watched it) is about text books in schools, and a telegram message group. I have addressed both of those points below with statements from the UN. This video is not evidence about any of Israel's claims made about the 12 UN workers, or that 10% of UNRWA are members of Hamas. It has NO relevance to this discussion whatsoever. Why does it have no relevance? Because this guy is lying through his back teeth. Here are several statements from the UN that refute his lies: https://www.un.org/unispal/document/unrwa-claims-versus-facts-press-release-26feb2024/

Hello Suella Braverman, what are you doing on AN? I thought you were busy drumming up extremist hate on TalkTV... where do you find the time?

I'm struggling to find any sympathy for this man, or his family. He was outside, burning his fields - causing a huge problem for everyone in society. How many more need to die or get sick before they finally crack down hard on all of these fire starting idiots?

You are either lying, or misinformed. There has been no evidence given at all for any of Israel's allegations against UNRWA, and most of the countries that held back funding have since resumed and given UNRWA their support. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/22/us-intelligence-unrwa-hamas

Actually you are wrong. Every single refugee in the world has exactly the same rights, passed down from generation to generation until they receive citizenship from a state. Disbanding UNRWA will not change this legal reality, however much Israel wishes to change it. Some countries hosting Palestinians have indeed given citizenship. Others do not do so, in order to allow Palestinians to continue to claim their birthright - land that was stolen from them. The right of return is not a magical law created only for Palestinians, it is a right given to every single refugee all around the world, and predates the Palestinian conflict. It has happened in many other conflicts. To suggest UNRWA perpetuates this is a falsehood spoken by people who wish to remove UNRWA. Amazing how UN bodies and laws are OK when Israel wanted statehood in 1948. Now Israel & the US are denying the Palestinians statehood, all of a sudden the UN and all of its agencies are antisemitic. Grow up Israel. Follow the law and you won't have any of these issues. Follow the law and there will be peace. Admit to the crimes it has committed over 76 years, and there just might be justice.

That's what some people would want you to believe. Only 33% of Jews in Israel are religious. The vast majority of Israelis are not religious, and that's not even including 20% of Arab Israelis for a population total. Including Arabs, your looking at around 13%. Hamas are an Islamist group - but they didn't start that way. Initially, they were a charity and were supported by the government of Israel. They have changed drastically over the decades since their formation in the late 80s, due to continued oppression. The PA are Israel's lapdogs and have no legitimacy in the eyes of the Palestinian people. The overwhelming majority of Palestinians prior to the war hated Hamas, and there were protests against this regime in the months prior to the war. Just over 50% of Palestinians wanted a permanent ceasefire with Israel and to have 2 states on the pre 1967 war borders. This is not a religious conflict. This is about land theft, justice, the denial of basic human rights, apartheid, oppression, murder, massacres, dispossession and racism.

He's received orders from the real man in charge. Time for the court to disband PTP!

So when is the constitutional court going to disband PTP for being under the influence of an outsider?

Because it was against the League of Nations charter & Mandate system to partition the land in the first place.

I agree with everything in this post. Particularly this part: no evidence had been unearthed to link the attacks, which killed more than 1,200 Israelis and wounded thousands more, to Tehran.

I would disagree with that analysis. I agree with this US analysis: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/14/middleeast/iran-israel-attack-drones-analysis-intl/index.html

"Secret letters written by Hamas boss who planned October 7 attack reveal Iran paid the terror group £200million" Were you not just saying that it was Iran who planned the attacks, but now you send me proof that Hamas planned the attacks?

Yes, I know that the Iranian regime is horrid. I don't care about that. I care about double standards, international law and fairness. Whilst I deplore the Iranian regime, they were perfectly within their rights to respond to the attack on their consulate. If states feel like they are not being treated fairly, they will do crazy things! I would go even further, and say Iran was pretty damn responsible. 1) They went to the UN and tried to get the UN security council to condemn the attack on their consulate. US, UK & France didn't allow it to go through. 2) They telegraphed their response, allowing 2 weeks of prep (just as the Americans do) 3) They sent warnings about the attack 4) They sent just enough to show a forceful response, and that they knew Israel's military capabilities. It was a very carefully, calibrated response because they do not want to go to war... It might be the end of the regime if they do.

1) Two of the sources you provided were only one source - the same article from Iran International, a company I can't verify. 2) The 3rd source was even older than US intelligence updates - Dec 2023 - compared to the WSJ article which was written on Oct 8 2023. Why does US say Iran was not involved. Why does Hamas say Iran was not involved. Why do you not believe them?

That's the same source as BKK brian. You are only showing one biased source. The company cannot be found on media verification websites. Read into that what you will.

It is a bit disingenuous to say I'm using old information, when the WSJ post you just sent was from the day after the original attack - October 8th 2023. US intelligence has since said they do not believe Tehran was involved. The US and Iran are hardly allies, so if they say they were not involved, I believe it because they hate each others guts! There is no reason for the US to lie in this way.