Cameroni

What first steps? Harris hasn't done anything apart from empty waffle. How do you think students at Berkely who risked their own careers and freedom to protest at their university for the right thing, the ending of American support for Israel, will feel about Harris' pointless waffle on Palestine? Same old, just like Biden this new Brat will just support Israel. Harris is not a real choice. All she cares about is her own career. As her letting all her prosecutors fall on the stake so she can save her own skin after the Trulove debacle shows,

Words are cheap. Palestinians don't need words. The students know this. So Palestinians get a few words, but not the right to speak at the DNC like the Israelis did? Looks like Harris' words have no meaning. Her speech made clear she will be no different from Biden and will support Israel at all costs. She is not "balanced" at all. She's another Israel supporter, like Biden and Trump. Well, not like Trump, because he genuinely believes Israel has to be supported, Harris thinks she needs to support Israel to get elected. Again, phony.

I don't think she handled the Palestine problem "brilliantly" at the DNC. It was poor form to let Israelis speak on the platform but not to allow a single student or Palestinian to even speak for one minute. She could have insisted a Palestinian American speak at the DNC, but of course we know why she did not. Like Biden, and Trump she will support Israel at all costs. Like Fidel Castro said, you get two candidates but one choice. Students not inclined to vote for Biden, will have no reason to vote for Harris, if they feel strongly on this issue.

I wouldn't go that far. Hilary was the devil. Harris is just very bad.

I also saw some black voters who did not like Kamala Harris in an interview. Of course Harris' record as a prosecutor, when she put innocent black men behind bars, should deter a fair number of black voters.

I already answered this earl, I am not happy with the Republican support of the murder of 15000 children. But then, it's not as if Harris provides a choice on this, she is adopting the same policy as Trump, support Israel at all costs.

Well, of course, but it just further boosts Kamala's phony aura, and she already appears massivly insincere every time she opens her mouth. The fact is students were hoping she would stand for Gaza, based on her previous actions. But she chose not to. Instead she adopts the same policy as Trump, support Israel at all cost. All the students who turned away from Biden due to this issue, have no reason to vote for Harris either.

Harris is well known for her support for Gaza before she became a candidate. She is hiding this now, because she knows it would hurt her chances to become president. I saw interviews with US students who were not happy with the lack of empathy shown for the Palesstinian cause at the DNC. And they will get nothing from Harris, because she knows she cannot give it if she wants to win. So these students may well not vote for Harris. They may not vote for either. To me Trump's stand on Israel is his biggest mistake, but then no candidate is perfect in this race and he is by far a better option than Harris, even with this error.

Well, it's a shame Michelle Obama did not feel enough of a Democrat allegiance to save this race for them, she was by far the best speaker at the DNC. She actually made Walz and Harris look bad. Biden didn't need her for that of course, electric....eh..electoral...lol But yes, circumstances forced the Democrats to pick Harris, you're right. It is indeed a surprise how well the Democrat media machine has built Harris up. But then they made sure to keep Harris away from the press and she made sure to read the lines given to her. Maybe her listening to her handlers better is the Democrat's best chance, as Trump can be his own worst enemy. But as candidates go Harris is a pretty terrible option. But yes, a close election and either can win. I really do feel Harris' numbers will come down closer to November, though. And even now in the swing states Trump and Harris are tied.

And also the Democrat media bigging up Harris and the "brat" nonsense will all become tiresome, much like Pink's performance at the DNC, which was quite embarassing.

Trump is a rabid Israel supporter and married his daughter into that mess, as we know. But you forget one thing, young students at Yale or Colombia who feel passionately about America supporting the killing of 15000 children turned away from Biden, and they will turn away from Kamala if she does not openly stand by her pro Gaza sentiments, which she is now hiding for her own personal gain in order to become president. It's pretty despicable. At least Trump honestly believes he should support Israel. However, Kamala Harris' heart belongs to Gaza but she is hypocritcally pretending she supports Israel just to get elected. Phony to the core. And the students can see through this, and may just decide not to vote for Harris because she's as bad for Gaza as Biden was.

I actually agree, had they chosen Michelle Obama or one of the real Democrat stars Trump would have had it much harder. In time, closer to the election, when Harris finally has to face the media and open her phony mouth, when her abysmal prosecutorial record comes under proper scrutiny and the new candidate bonus wears off, Harris' numbers will fall from the current highs. It's still a close election, but Trump can win it against Harris.

Lol, a "fine" and "informative" speech? Really? So what information did Harris provide on how she will pay for her tax cut bribes? Did not hear any info on that. It was a speech high on clichees, but low on actual policy and information. And that voice, surely I'm not the only one who wants to throw the remote at the TV when she opens her mouth? Not to mention the phony insincerity and fake semi-tearful delivery. What a fake this woman.

We both know when it comes to speeches Trum's entertainment value is unmatched. The whole world tunes in.

Yes, and Germany too has severe problems to sustain the 8 billion freebies it hands out to Ukraine and has announced it will scale that back to 50 percent less and then one tenth of it. In the US many are questioning the enormous sums poured into Ukraine. It can't continue indefinitely. Resources are limited in the West.

Actually, a hoarse seagull could probably have sqawked out a better speech than Kamala Harris gave. Painful and embarrassing to watch. Empty clichées. Delivered in that semi-tearful insincerity that characterizes Harris. Phony to the core.

Kamala's speech was a paint-by-numbers collection of clichés. She’s from and for the middle class. She’ll be a president for all Americans. She’ll fight for this country. Anything is possible in America. Another emphasis in her speech — in keeping with how she’s tried to define herself over the last month — was that she was a tough prosecutor. But she was soft by the standards of the time, then ran away from her record during her 2019 presidential campaign and became a fellow traveler of the BLM rioters in 2020. Now, she’s supposedly Wyatt Earp again. https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/08/harriss-collection-of-cliches/

In addition she keeps all her policies hidden. Nobody knows what she stands for. Because if voters knew, nobody would vote for her apart from Portland radicals.

Nobody committed suicide. Nor is there any indication that anyone is about to commit suicide. Perhaps we should stick to the facts here?

MOSCOW, Aug 23 (Reuters) - Russia accused Ukraine on Friday of trying to attack the Kursk nuclear power station overnight in what it called an act of "nuclear terrorism", days before the head of the U.N. atomic watchdog is due to visit the site. Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Ukraine on Thursday of trying to attack the facility, and said Moscow had informed the IAEA. The head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, is due to visit the power station next week. He has appealed for maximum restraint to avoid a nuclear accident. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-accuses-ukraine-trying-attack-kursk-nuclear-power-plant-with-drone-2024-08-23/

I was actually shocked the Democrats picked Kamala Harris. At the time she had poll ratings of 39 per cent. She wasn't actually a dream candidate, I thought the Democrats had half a dozen better candidates. It was indeed a relief a mediocrity like Kamala Harris got the nomination (well coup annoitment really). However, the Democrat media machine did well to build her up into almost a real personality. Impressive stuff. Pink's peformance at the DNC less so, a bit cringe to be honest.

So the youth and future of America studying at Columbia, Yale et al have the choice of a president who openly and rabidly supports Israel or a one who pretends to care about Palestinians but doesn't even bother to give a speaking slot to a Palestinian American. Got ya.

Why don't you talk about how the DNC had an Israeli couple talk about how their son was held hostage, but oddly no Palestinian American talking about how Israel killed 15000 children? What did Biden and Harris do to bring peace in the Middle East? Apart from siding with Israel as usual? How will that play with young voters in American universities, do you think? Should a Palestinian American have had a speaking spot at the DNC?

That's wishful thinking on your part. It would be hard to think of a worse orator than Kamala Harris. Her voice is grating and unpleasant. Her speech lacked any substance whatsoever. As far as opponents go, Kamala Harris would be the dream for any Trump supporter. Now, if Ms Obama would run. Then, yes, Trump supporters would be worried. That woman can talk. It's a blessing that she is not runnig but instead Kamala Harris.

Indeed, to all intents and purposes polls are a snapshot in time always. They will try to amend their data to reflect new trends but this may or may not succeed in reality. I'm a forex trader and we use a variety of tools to predict how the market will act. However, more often than not the market surprises almost everyone, despite the best info and tools we use to predict what it will do. Reality has too many variables. It's true, past events form future trends...often, but not always. There can be major suprises.