The Cyclist

Can you provide evidence of any woman and children in these hotels ? I doubt very much that women and children ( the few that have arrived ) are actually housed in hotels with hordes of fighting age males. Right Wing thugs ? Yes, I am sure that some of them are right wing thugs, just like Southport, the majority are just normal people sick of what is going on. Yes it is. Sadly, this is what happens when Governments think they know better than the population, ignore their concerns, try and cover up what people can see with their own eyes. The result is violence. Not Right Wing violence, just violence. But you have heard of the term " Fighting age males " and as most people are aware, rape has been part of warfare for Centuries. And these people are not coming to spread love and happiness.

Thank you 🙏

You're welcome, throw them and they will come back. That cap fits you perfectly. Wear it with pride.

At a rough guess. The Organisation that cuts about with " refugees welcome " banners and placards https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0gq5wg2gzo Just one of many. Trip to specsavers needed, as you apparently are blind to this specific issue.

At least you had an attempt, a vey poor one granted, but better than the other button mashing mentallists that cannot even type a response. Now, could you provide a link to your Tik Tokking protest outside the IDC, in the name of humanity. Otherwise, some might think that your humanity, is very selective.

Who said these people should be in hotels or housing ? I'm fairly certain the International mandated requirements are. 1 Safety 2 Shelter 3 Food. Which is why the UNHCR uses tented camps and not hotels and houses. And if tented camps are good enough for the UNHCR, then tented camps are good enough for the UK.

Another good example of suppression from the BBC, or perhaps it's only mis-information 😀😀 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgeqwv98d55o How can this be, when 25,000 have arrived over the last 6 1/2 months ? A where is the cost of putting them with up with Private Landlords ? Does that take it above the £3 billion a year / £8.3 million a day ? If I was a cynic. I might suggest that the costs using Private Landlords is even more expensive than the hotels, or you would be trumpeting the win loudly.

It is They are just doing their best to try and suppress it But those nasty, racist, Right Wingers keep letting the cat out of the bag.

The rest haven't been caught....... Yet.

So the Thai Government, via taxpayers, is forking out next to nothing. Probably providing free of charge the land for the camps. But forking out for nothing else, as it is provided by UNHCR and BCR. Glad that we have cleared up that there is absolutely no comparison between Thailand and the UK.

The Army could rig up a razor wire, tented camp, anywhere on the 1000's of Acres of Army training areas, in a week. Complete with basic toilet facilities and a slop house. Anyone, from any Party advocating binning the ECHR are playing to the Gallery. No point in binning the ECHR and leaving the UK's HRA in situ. They both need to go and be replaced by something that is beneficial to UK Citizens. Not many Law abiding, hard working citizens have any need for either the ECHR or the HRA, there is more than enough UK Law to cover them. Think about it. How many UK Citizens do you know that have had a need to run to the ECHR or need protection under the HRA, or as it's commonly known the Criminal Rights Act. And none of it will make a blind bit of difference, without taking a factory worth of chainsaws and cutting the Armies of Yuman Rites Parasites into firewood ( Metaphorically, of course * ) * One of the bereft of Humour, Irony and Sarcasm will report me 😀😀 Which could all be made moot, by simply calling a National Emergency under the National Security Act, which would cut off the ECHR, the HRA and the Armies of Yuman Rites Parasites. Why has this not already been done ? Your guess would be as good as mine. Spineless jellyfish, spring to mind.

No they don't. Thailand hosts Refugees, which is totally different to Asylum Seekers. Do these 7000 a year cost the Thai taxpayers in the region of £55,000 a year each ? And where are they housed ? Hotels, scarce housing or in Refugee camps ? Why are the UNHCR not demanding more humane treatment for those individuals, like they are trying to with the UK ?

How many asylum seekers in Thailand, do you think are posting on Asean now ? But as you correctly point out Not much of a difference in * Numbers. * Benefits * Housing. * And I doubt it is Bangkok Hospital or Thantakit Dental Hospital handing out freebies.

Or try to get a free hotel Or try to claim benefits Or try to get a council house Or try to get free medical treatment Or try to get free dental treatment. The list is probably endless. The irony and mentalism, is that there are some on these pages, who claim to be in Thailand, think that the UK in particular and the West in general, should throw these thing s about like underwear at a hoors convention.

Who said they want to damp down public anger ? It is a welcome deflection from the utter cluster that Governments are. 1 million foreign Nations claiming £7.5 Billion a year in Universal Credit gives an indication. Shouldn't matter. If they need benefits to top up wages, they shouldn't be in the UK. Speaks for itself I'm not convinced it would, it would ramp it up. The Government are working on the theory that people are too lazy, or too stupid to do their own research.

Because that is a wonderful deterrent. How about declaring a National Emergency. Then getting the Army to build tented camps in remote areas. Where they can be kept securely, feed 3 times a day. International convention dictates, Security, shelter and food. Not 4 star hotels, houses and a myriad of other benefits.

There is the problem right there Reporting the truth, is not, never has been and never will be Right Wing. You could also say the same about 30 years of D, E and I, being pushed by the left. i believe that you could not be more wrong if you tried. Mentalist everywhere, who are quite happy to see the UK heading down the drain.

But apparently brave enough, to make an appearance, to hit the thumbs down button Up your game mentalists.

The Times are running with this https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/uk-asylum-seekers-caught-double-benefits-68krzd9cj Asylum seekers, my arse. And we best not mention the " Hotels " where they are running Illegal food delivery businesses from.

for some bizarre reason, that currently escapes me There are some posters, who are conspicuous by their absence 😀😀 Chopper, immediately springs to mind.

This, in a nutshell, explains the situation, at least from the UK side. The Armies of Yuman Rites Parasites, have the people in power, either working for them , Starmer and Hermer, being the 2 obvious candidates. Or terrified of opening their mouths and speaking out, as to do so, gets you immediately branded as XRW. Poor little Asylum Seekers https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/uk-asylum-seekers-caught-double-benefits-68krzd9cj Now if that is not grounds for ripping up any asylum claim, and deporting faster than you can say " You're out " then the UK has gone beyond the point of no return.

Ballymena now Epping. 1 common denominator. Sadly, I fear this is only the beginning and the pot is coming to the boil.

You did ask, right here Hard to argue with with the posters comment, concerning the UK Votes for 16 year olds, no problem, in return for binning postal voting for all that live in the UK. ETA Did we all know that 2 Tier Keir was instrumental in the marriage act 2022, that bans Under 18's from getting married, even with parental consent. Not mature enough according to 2 Tier Kier.

I hear ya, although I don't necessarily agree with you. Whilst Reform are more than likely to win the next GE. The MSM have not really wound up the rhetoric yet, and the lawfare has not started. My main concern, although I like a lot of what reform are saying, can be put into 3 bullet points. * Getting it through the HoC' * Getting it through the HoL's * And battling with a hostile CS, Lawfare and hostile Judiciary. They would need to really box clever when putting out their election manifesto, and make sure that the electorate are in no doubt as to what they are voting for.

That is about the size of it. If they really wanted to reform the electoral system. They would have made voting compulsory and added a non of the above to the ballot paper. Never happen, the truth would hurt them too much. Precious little creatures that they are.