Stiddle Mump

It's sad to hear of bad effects due to the jabs. And you are on the money regarding the 'shushy-shushy' mode of the medical people, We - the human race - is at a cross road. Do we move forward and reap the rewards of tech, medical innovation and AI convenience. Is it progress? Does it all make us happyier? IMO. we would be better off is we could accept that we are a integral part of nature, It is there for us. It is not there to harm us.

Looks like the pro-vaxxers are doomed then? They will obviously mutate - just like a virus - and terrorise the anti-vaxxers. But the anties will stand strong, But in the end, it will be victory for the original humans. Then the anties will be sitting pretty.

The Germ Theory is just that. There are reasons why we get sick; and germs are not responsible. The Germ Theory was taken on board by wealthy individuals over 100 years ago. They could see the potential for big money to be made if the populas could be convinced of certain things. These people - and those that followed - have dominated western medical science since. So much so, that those speaking out, and explaining there are other reasons for both good and bad health, are rubbished, vilified, and often both threatened and cancelled. Truth needs defending in the face of nonsense and lies. That's what i do. Truth does not need covering up, and being hidden..

Why not debate Dan? We disagree on some details, Let's have it out.

My number one league team at home to City. Can they do it? Funny thing is, that although I don't like extra and pens. I want to get to pens in this one. Then it's 50-50.

Water levels are low in north Isaan. No rain for 127 days in our area. But not to fret. Some is forecast for late April. 😿 Anyone looking at this thread, would think there are virtually no people in the areas you visit. This time of year all the farms are in limbo. Went to our farm this afternoon. 3klm out of the village. Stayed for 2 hours and only saw one other person. Great pics as usual Chris.

Shame you don't want to debate Dan. Never mind. But I'll not stop trying to educate you. Look up Dr Frances Kelsey. They should have made a new Nobel Prize topic just for her. And the winner is Dr Kelsey for her avocation of common sense. Yea!

The New York Post eh! The only thing that a reader can be sure of with this awful rag; is the date. And best to check that with the wall calendar.

That's OK Will. Good to have you aboard. The more people, especially if they are white-coats, we can get the nature message out to, the better. I believe that the body (mine and yours and everyone's) does the best for us (it) at all times. Of course we have to play our part by giving it the tools to do that; mostly through eating good nutritious food. And avoiding trash food loaded with sugar, salt and chemicals. But also by being at one with nature itself. We must also play our part AMAP in stopping undesirables invading us. After all, you wouldn't light a log fire, and deliberately breathe in the smoke. Our lifestyle is intrinsically linked to good health; or otherwise.

Me for one. Not you of course Will, but the others, who blindly accept the white-coat nonsense as though it was the truth, need to see things differently. The germ theory is just that; a theory. Nature is the truth. You are a part of nature. So am I. It is not out to harm itself. As I have said often enough. Nature is only interested in a few fundamental things. Survival (through protecting itself) and reproduction. Our bodies are ruled by nature. It wants the best for us. It has all the answers; if we care to look.

You are off my digital Xmas Card list Sir. For 2025 that is. If you want to get back on it for 2026, try not to be so disingenuous. I seek the truth. If you don't like, agree, or understand that, I can live with it. True, I do like a ruse or two, but on the topics that are health related, I'm simply trying to educate, and get people to think. Also to encourage them to do proper research. Not just listen to the BBC, CNN or read Wikipedia.

So you cut yer teeth, so to speak, Dan. You know the business eh! My credentials are; I'm a person that seeks the truth, I am happy with, and can defend my position. Do you not ever consider that we are nature? Nature is us. What you believe, and a whole lot of others as well, is built simply on theoretical falsehoods. That nature is somehow out to get us. If you look back, historically, you will see that powerful, and wealthy individuals, jumped onto the nonsense claims that a few white-coats made 100+ years ago. why? To make money of course! And they are still at it. And their position is built on a theory that does not stand up to scrutiny. As for the FDA?! For my money, there is only one person in that wretched organisation that I have/had any respect for. Yes - you have guessed her name - Frances Kelsey. She, through her belief in seeking the truth, and her immense strength, in resisting the unrelenting Big Pharma pressure she was being subjected to, saved perhaps a million US mothers, from giving birth to deformed babes. Nature has the answers we seek. It's there to help us; not destroy us.

Great pics kwonitor. I will say, a couple of the images are similar to what I've seen under the microscope. Some look like drawings. You would think that knowing all about these images - especially the ebola one - they could gather together enough of them together to isolate, and show the scientific world what they have done. Not yet! And not likely to either.

Not only that Rattles. The pro-vaxxers have almost certainly had the clot shot. And probably more than one. Dr D Cahill reckons they will have serious effects with 5 years. There are things they could do to ease their suffering, when it does arrive, but they have to swallow some pride and be more humble. Or it's ???? Anyway! I don't like to see suffering so they know where to find me.

You obviously don't see things as he does. He has had many peer reviewed papers published though.

Best not to waste your time then Sir. The best pic I have of the viruses is the ludicrous varient of the original. That's Fred in the centre. And his girlfriend Mable is just behind getting stuck into some tasty cells. She's a real greedy pig.

You are wrong Sir. Electron microscopy cannot distinguish a virus from other cell debris. If you have a pic that can show as you say; please post it.

We have an electric vehicle. Don't dare go anywhere where it might need charging. 30 km round trips max.

Of course they should be stopped at once. They should never have got started. But covid, and the only cure, was like a giant snowball rolling down a mountain. i'm well aware of Dr McCullough. I applaud his action on the horrific killer jabs. He certainly has some pull among the alt science (truthers) group, But I don't agree with him on the one fundamental theory. And I'll say why. '''Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits.''' There are NO benefits to taking a covid jab. What's the point of any person taking this toxic filth into their body to cure, or lessen the effects of, or whatever, of something that does not exist? This is where the good Doc and me, part company. Basically; is it true, that viruses exist? Peter McCullough obviously thinks so. I say NO they don't. There are far simpler reasons why we get sick, and viruses are not on the list.

Best to take a small generator, and a few litres of fuel, on any trip where you might need to charge up.

Nothing I post, whether it is on this thread, or the cancer one I recently opened up, is false. The two threads are linked by the word 'cancer'. We need debate on this topic. I do know what I'm talking about Sir. There is no evidence that a virus called 'covid' ever existed. For that matter; any virus has existed. And if no virus ever existed; what's the point of vaxxes? Can't you see that it's all made up nonsense. As for the second group being awake, well some are certainly more awake than the sheep who simply believe, without question, what is coming out of someone's mouth because they are wearing a white coat or on the BBC/CNN. I've said it before, but it's worth saying again; most white-coats either don't know what they are talking about, or they have taken a few bob to shut up and do as requested. Or,,,,! Let's wait for Epstein;s client list shall we?

At the right time, that lake is beautiful, Before the whole area was carved up, and before Udon was developed: Nong Han was the major admin district. Stonking pics Chris.

I don't agree with you Sir. People in the second group (as you say) are generally awake to the nonsense, hoaxes and frauds in the scientific world. I can tell you now; no-one has died from covid. It never was dangerous, cause it don't exist. And IMO, not vaccinating yer kids, is a giant step forward for ensuring their future well-being. '',,,virus causing the next pandemic.'' Turn the television off Sir. Stop watching that endless propaganda. Dear me! Get with nature I say. It has all the answers we seek.

The way the body behaves is fundamentally to protect itself, and if compromised, to do what is the most efficient, and safe route, to get back to optimal heath. Fevers, sore-throat, bad belly, prolonged bouts of sneezing etc. They are all tools that our bodies use, to rid itself of undesirable entities. A tumor is the same. The body is sometimes unable to rid itself of a toxin, so to stop it running riot, it is captured, coated in protective substances, isolated it, tucked away, and removed gradually, if need be. Unfortunately; if the same toxin keeps breaching the defence system, the tumor will grow. It might even get its own blood supply. But again, that is to allow the body to eliminate it. The principle of the body doing what needs to be done, in order to protect itself, is with us all he time.

Let me progress. Can cancer be a good thing? Well, if you see the body as only interested in a couple of natural things, then yes, it definitely can. If you are a believer in conventional medicine; then no. The fundamental things that the body strives for are 'protection', 'survival' and 'reproduction'. Everything that happens inside us goes towards our well-being. It protects itself, so that it can survive to reproduce. The essence of nature. So where does cancer fit in? It's a toxic world out there. If the body is subjected to prolonged toxicity, or too much in one go, the defence/maintenance (immune?) system might become overwhelmed, and decide that it cannot eliminate the toxin through normal methods. So what does it do? it coats the entity, isolated it, and tucks it away. Maybe not out of harms way; but where it can do least harm. With a view to rid itself of the entity ASAP. Which it normally does. This method of protection is a way of the body limiting the danger of the toxic element. So I say yes. There are times when a tumor is used to protect the body itself.