- Popular Post
-
Posts
12,335 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by JonnyF
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:Great News for Labour and anyone who wants to get rid of the Tories.
A lazy analysis.
People who were fed up with the Tories might have held their nose and voted Labour. Now, many will vote Reform instead.
It could also force the Tories back to the right of centre, gaining them more votes from traditional Conservative voters.
Farage got Brexit over the line and even got elected to the EU Parliament with a brand new party. He should not be underestimated. Expect lots of childish insults from the left (as this thread demonstrates).
-
1
-
3
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Looks like the left are panicking. 😃
Given what he did with his election to the EU Parliament with the Bexit Party, I'm not surprised.
I suspect a lot of people disillusioned with Labour/Conservatives who may not have voted will now make the journey to the polling station, even if it is a protest vote.
This certainly makes the election more interesting, it would have been a snooze fest with Starmer and Sunak 'battling' it out. Imagine what could happen in the event of a hung parliament. A Tory/Reform coalition?
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
4
-
3
-
So Labour is racist now as well as anti-semitic? I hope more prominent black people come out to highlight this disgraceful discrimination by the champagne socialists of Islington. It simply must be stopped. We cannot tolerate it.
WHAT DO WE WANT?
JUSTICE FOR DIANE
WHEN DO WE WANT IT?
NOOWWWWW
Please make a comeback Diane. We need you.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Walker88 said:Yea, he's a martyr just like Osama bin Laden is a martyr to radical jihadis. Anyway, he prefers to compare himself to Mother Teresa.
He's actually kryptonite to Repubs. All he ever won was the Electoral College in 2016.
He lost the popular vote twice.
He lost (R)s the House in 2018, and both the House and Senate in 2020.
He lost the Senate in Georgia really badly...even the runoff.
As he whines his way into the election, he will lose more and more fringe and swing voters with his bizarre rants and threats of 'retribution'. His conviction will only help with those who already worship him; it won't gain new voters.
His presser yesterday was absolute madness. Totally unhinged stream of (un)consciousness. Jails in the Congo? WTF?
As Jimmy Kimmel said, the guy has so many screws loose even Boeing is going to recall him.
Comparing Trump to Bin Laden?
Get a grip...😃
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Interesting that they avoided mentioning any Muslim countries.
I wonder why...
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
This article is the biggest pile of nonsense that I've had the misfortune of reading in ages.
Sounds like something Ash Sarkar would write after 3 days on ya baa.
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The mythical far right.
Invented by the left to discredit anyone with a different opinion. Massive fail.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
- Popular Post
They've made him into a martyr.
All the Republicans need now is Hillary to make a speech calling his supporters nasty names and it will be a slam dunk for the GOP.
Come on Hillary, think about Monica and let rip with that bile. Maybe Obama could do a speech as well, he managed to secure Brexit so let's hear his empty threats again.
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
3 hours ago, RayC said:
I don''t support many of Abbott's causes and think that she is too gaff-prone to be an effective frontline politician. However, I do think that she has a point about Starmer 'culling' the Labour Party of left-wingers.
Since his election as leader, Starmer has tried to remake the party in his image. It leaves me with the impression that "broad church" only extends to worshipping in the 'Temple of Keir"
You will have to wait until they are elected before you see how loony left the Labour Party still are.
Starmer is trying to present them as electable. Abbott is a massive liability and I hope she gets as much coverage as possible.
Her toxicity and bitterness oozes from every pore. Fortunately she is unable to keep her mouth shut so we are able to witness it in all it's glory.
Her son is even worse than Hunter Biden. I guess parenting skills do not rank high on "liberals" priorities as they climb the greasy pole to power on the back of fake virtuosity and lies.
-
Typical elitist champagne socialist. I'm surprised Harry wasn't on board on his way to preach about climate change.
Daddy was a tool maker (in the factory he owned).
God help us if they win.
I heard Diane Abacus is making a comeback as well. 😄
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:Trump was removed from office by a fair and democratic election.
Trump was indicted by a Grand Jury,
Trump has been convicted by a jury of his pears in open court.If you have evidence that the Jury did not give right and proper consideration to the evidence and testimony presented in court, let’s be having it.
This conviction will be the biggest own goal since Hillarys deplorables speech
Mark my words.
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
1 hour ago, placeholder said:
So, you think that there's no significant statistical connection between local elections and general elections. The Tories just happened to suffer a major loss because of ??????????
Because Bristol is like a far left socialist republic.
Look at what happened there during BLM. They all crawled out from under their rocks to vandalize and riot. Bristol is an outlier. The suburbs are centre right but fall under other areas like Gloucestershire.
Don't get your hopes up for the general election.
-
2
-
-
39 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Trump wasn’t convicted in less than twelve hours, the trial went on for weeks.
The jury deliberated for less than 12 hours. Almost like they had already made their minds up.
39 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:I do accept that you might not be used to the rich and powerful being held accountable to the law, but holding a rich and powerful criminal accountable to the law in open court of law and judged by a jury is the polar opposite of ‘Banana Republic’ behavior.
Of course the rich and powerful can be convicted. It depends if they are on the wrong side of the political divide.
Look at Thailand for example, Thaksin (like Trump) was removed. In fact Thailand now has many similarities to the USA in terms of removing popular politicians via kangaroo courts.
-
1
-
1
-
-
50 minutes ago, jvs said:
No just long over due,from time to time laws need to be amended.
Nobody has foreseen a thing like this would ever happen but it has to be dealt with,just to keep up with the times.
Don't you agree?
No I don't agree that the laws should be changed to exclude people with a criminal conviction a day after Trump is convicted of all 34 out of 34 charges in less than 12 hours.
That's the type of thing that happens in banana republics. Despite recent events, I'd like to think America is still above that type of thing.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:You're rationalizing the outcome.
It's one of the seven stages of grief.
Grieving? 😄 For a start, I am no fan of Trump (although I prefer him to Biden) but I am less of a fan of kangaroo courts and politically motivated trials.
Secondly, Trump has lost the battle but not the war. If this were a football game he's conceded a free kick in the opponents half in the 15th minute. Hardly worth grieving over, even for Trump fans.
I predict he will still win in November. In fact I believe it is more likely after this debacle.
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:There are multiples queries on here as to whether one can accept the verdict as guilty.
I don't know exactly what 'accept' means. At the begonning of the trial Judge Merchan advised Trump and his attorneys that if Trump does not show up every day the court is in session, the judge will issue a warrant for his immediate arrest. So this I accept as the real thing.
Do I 'agree' with the verdict? No.
"The jurors reached a verdict in the late afternoon, after less than 12 hours of deliberation in the hush money criminal case."
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4685007-jury-reaches-verdict-trump-hush-money-trial/
The Jury instructions were 48 pages before getting to the standard every trial-type instructions.
I don't see how the jury could have read and commented on points raised in 12 hours. And as even left-leaning legal pros have commented, there are issues in Judge Merchan's pre-trial rulings that are fodder for appeal.
Exactly.
Guilty on all 34 counts after less than 12 hours deliberation.
The optics are terrible. Like something from a banana republic. 😃
-
1
-
1
-
4
-
2 minutes ago, Moncul said:
I'd like to say I'm surprised no-one has pushed for an amendment before, but with the number of outright crooks in office it's not really a shocker is it?And yet here you are, calling for it the day after Trump gets a conviction.
Not politically motivated of course 😄.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, jvs said:
Not only Trump but any convicted criminal should not be able to run for office.
Time to do some amending.
Interesting timing to reach such a conclusion.
Purely coincidental I'm sure 😃.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:That is why the whole discussion stops at either "convicted felon" or "34 counts!!" without any cogent explanation.
I think finding him guilty on all 34 doesn't look legit. If it was say, 25 out of 34 people might think it was a fair and well considered judgement.
Now, with a slam dunk of all 34 it looks like there could have been a 35th charge of flying to Mars on a unicorn without a licence and he'd have 35 counts.
The optics are terrible and are likely to increase his support.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
2 minutes ago, jvs said:
What bothers me is that a convicted criminal can still run for president!
Surely that should be changed.
Yes now you have the conviction let's change the law to keep Trump out of office. That seems fair. 😃
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:
Nope. @JonnyF wants a second jury vote.
Strawman.
Weak strawman. 😃
-
9 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:
Chalk and cheese. There's legal precedent for a second referendum vote.
Not before implementing the first one.
9 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:There's none for throwing out an election result because you don't agree with it.
Which is what they were trying to do.
9 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:In fact in some countries a first referendum is sometimes ratified by a second one. I think Denmark and Ireland have done this.
Agreed beforehand. They wouldn't have been demanding a second vote if they had won the first.
-
9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Yep, that’s democracy.
It isn't if you try to oveturn the original vote before it has been implemented.
Would it be democratic for Trump to demand another vote in December if he loses in January? Of course not, yet you wanted another vote on Brexit before the result of the first one had been implemented.
So asking for people's acceptance of votes/verdicts seems a bit of a stretch for you. The hypocrisy is not surprising though...
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:
I hope you can accept the result in November. Or will you be calling for another vote if your side lose, like you did with Brexit?
-
1
-
1
-
‘Let’s make Britain great again’ Farrage Stuns UK Politics Announces Return For Election
in World News
Posted
If by failure, you mean outperforming France and Germany.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/01/26/even-lacklustre-britain-outperforming-failing-europe/
The EU is failing. We got out at the right time. History will be very kind to Brexit.
The Scots should be thanking Westminster.