JonnyF

The stats are not that high. But where "Pitbulls" do score high it is because "Pit Bull type" includes multiple different breeds, including mixed breeds containing part "pitbull type". As I have said before, you are comparing many to one. It's like comparing the crash statistics of a Mercedes C200d to every model of BMW combined (1 series, 2 series, 3 series and so on). It's clearly not a meaningful comparison.

We already have the facts Ray, they are accepting thousands of pounds worth of bribes (or gifts as they are calling them) from the Premier League at the same time as they are appointing a regulator to the Premier League. It's corruption.

Yes, dog fighting took place in a pit. Between 2 dogs. They were never bred to fight or attack humans. Many dog breeds have been bred to fight/kill other animals. Be that bears, boar, foxes or whatever. It is not unique to the PitBull.

Good one Ray, thanks 😄😂.

They already admitted taking the bribe.

The Premier League look to be going pretty hard. Not only a free box at Arsenal for Free Gear Keir, but now free Taylor Swift tickets as well. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g520vvz4eo Looks like they really don't want Labour to appoint that new regulator. Good news for Labour MP's. Lots of bribes floating around.

You clearly don't know the difference between industrial and industrious.😂 I'll help you out this time, but next time try not to use words when you don't know the meaning, especially when describing me.

Probably exchanges them for a seat in Starmer's executive box at Arsenal. Proper socialists these two...

I'd settle for thugs being charged. Unfortunately, certain groups are treated differently under 2 tier Keir, for example the thugs who broke the female police officers nose at Manchester Airport that still haven't been charged. I wonder why? The FaceBook posters were in jail within a week. I guess hurty words are deemed more important than hurty broken noses, depending on who is dishing out the hurt of course.

No need for a PhD. Just basic common sense. Train them, and don't let them roam freely. Same as any dog really.

Yes, fighting other dogs. Not people. There was never a sport for Man vs PitBull, maybe you are thinking of bull fighting? In fact, human aggression was never bred into them since these fighting dogs often lived in the family home in between fights and had to be handled in the pit by humans during fights. A PitBull that indiscriminately attacks humans has either been poorly trained or neglected/abused. Unfortunately, Thai attitudes to dog ownership often are not compatible with powerful dogs (caging them, little/no exercise, disciplining them with a stick etc.). Educating owners is the answer. I don't think I've ever seen a dog on a lead outside Bangkok. Mine stays on an extendable lead even when being exercised on our private land, just in case any local mutts wander over and attack him. Responsible ownership is key.

Interesting. Maybe you could post links in the "Rishi Sunak is a working class hero" thread.

Working class hero with her 66k taxpayer funded personal photographer. 😄 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/09/23/angela-rayner-hires-taxpayer-funded-66k-vanity-photographer/

But you think the rape of 13-15 year olds is "Meh". I think we are done here, I need to take a shower.

Thankfully not with your ilk lurking...

Sexually active? Maybe? But not raped on camera for the likes of Huw Edwards viewing pleasure. PS they were 13 to 15.

I think they meant crime capital of Europe. Or maybe stabbing capital?

Just giving the police more powers so they can continue with such action without having to apologize for it next time. They can claim the Jew was not folliwing this new "respect orders" move (could they make it sound any more authoritarian I wonder? 😄). They already have the powers to deal with the offenses mentioned in the OP. For example, shoplifting is already a crime. Just enforce existing laws equally across all groups and drop the two tier policing.

Sounds like you should change your username to NowThenNowThen.

Are you even serious? Category A pictures of 14-16 (acutally 13-15) and you say Meh. Do you even know what category A is? So essentially rape of a child. And your response is "Meh". Truly revolting.

The ages are estimates so reports sometimes differ, not that it really matters. Most of the Cat A images were estimated at 13-15. Truly disgusting, and not something I would want to be seen excusing or downplaying. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgm7dvv128ro

It would be unwise to mention it, that would highlight the fact they already did it. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-68856360

More dishonesty. I said there was more than 1 picture of 7 to 9 year olds. He also said he approved the sending of "young", "naughty" pictures. Not at all. I said they included pictures of 7-9 year olds. He did receive more than one picture of 7 to 9 year olds. I never claimed they were all that age. Some were 11-13, some 13-15. Many in category A. Truly revolting stuff. Speak for yourself. But actually most of them were 13 to 15 (not sure why you keep dishonestly increasing their age to try to make the crime seem less serious). The man is 63 years old, and was married with 5 kids. Stop downplaying his disgusting crimes. People who pay for these images create the market for the rape of children.

Might be a good idea to stop blaming the Tories then 😆.

Looks like free clothes and premier league tickets aren't enough for Starmer. He also wants his sausages back 😄 https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/24/keir-starmer-makes-gaza-sausages-gaffe-in-labour-conference-speech