JonnyF

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I don't know if that is the case or not. But it would be understandable. Because Harry can't just go to Nana or Soi 6 for an hour. It seems he has very limited options, or to be precise just one option. She can say yes or no and that's it.

Well Harry hasn't got much of a choice over anything now has he? She's cut him off from his family so if he falls out with Markle while over in the US then he's got nothing to fall back on except a few hangers on. She's got him exactly where she wants him.

In the words of the great Ice-T "you played yourself, ain't nobody else's fault you played yourself".

45 minutes ago, stevenl said:

The judges are out in full force, all based on the tabloids.

Or could it be their opinions are influenced by her being independent, older than he is, divorced, American and coloured?

How predictable (and sad) that a virtue signalling SJW would immediately accuse someone who doesn't like Markle of being a racist, ageist and anti-American.

You didn't point out she was a woman by the way, that was a missed opportunity for labeling people who you disagree with as Misogynists as well. An amateur mistake for someone of your expert level "wokeness".

14 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Maybe you missed it but Trump supporters outside of the USA are few in numbers.

And it's not difficult to understand that people don't want to live in a country with a moron for president.

You're living in Thailand, right?

Good. Hopefully that's the last we hear of these spoiled, woke, hypocritical, whining brats.

1 hour ago, RuamRudy said:

The amount of hostility that is being displayed towards this couple is truly disturbing. He never chose to be born into this circus; he didn't request to be a figurehead - it was all thrust upon him from the moment he was born. He has had the press following his every move for years, making his life as miserable as his mother's, and then when he finds a wife, she is daily vilified in the press in the most pathetic, tawdry ways. No wonder he wants shot of this ridiculous institution of a monarchy and this nasty little island filled with nasty little people. 

Nobody objects to them leaving as they as they leave properly (i.e. a hard Megxit).

What annoys people is them stepping back from duties while retaining the cottage, the security at taxpayers expense, using SussexRoyal.com for their website name etc. It's cherry picking and people don't like it. Markle's hypocrisy on climate change (preaching about carbon emissions while flying around world on private jets), announcing the move without informing the Queen, releasing the news on Kate's birthday etc. also rubs people the wrong way. She's embarrassing the Royal Family and people don't appreciate it.

It's a shame you think Britain is a nasty little island filled with nasty little people. I'm not sure if you're suffering from self loathing or just have an unpleasant social circle. My friends and family in the UK are lovely people ????.

4 minutes ago, Gold Star said:

Best to part with that dysfunctional family, and move on to a happier life. They seem to love the laid back attitude and non pretentious people of west coast Canada, and feel very welcome there as a part of the community, not as celebrities. Canada is a perfect fit being similar to America in many ways, but with close ties to the old British Commonwealth in the days before Canada was stabbed in the back and sold out by Britain to join the EU. I think his mother would have agreed they are making the right choice. 

Markle loves the attention. But a bit like Posh Spice, she likes to pretend she hates it. 

She wont last more than 2 months being treated like a normal person in Canada. She will be off to LA pretending to be annoyed by (but really loving) all the attention as she leaves restaurants with other woke celebrities. 

Markle doesn't annoy me. Shes like the scorpion in the frog/scorpion tale but Harry has mugged himself off and needs sort himself out. I get that he's in need of a domineering woman after losing his mother so young but he is taking it too far.

I support Megxit almost as much as I support Brexit. As long as it's a hard Megxit.

Hopefully she'll be asking for the keys to Frogmore cottage.

If they want to leave, fine just go. But dont drag the British Royal Family through the dirt for your dumb woke agenda. Just give up your titles and your funding and feckoff to LA to do the talkshow circuit with your dominating B movie actress wife.

23 minutes ago, URMySunshine said:

He was warned by his mum when he was a kid, his brother and his many mates. He'll pretty soon learn living in the Markle bubble is a nightmare and come back to the family in time. 

She's trying to cut him off from the family so he's all hers. She can parade him round the LA celebrity circuit like some kind of trophy royal husband while UK taxpayers pay for the bodyguards and limos for "security".

If he is stupid enough to fall it he should be cut off like a ginger step child. Oh wait a minute...

30 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

5.5 million with an NHS will outperform 55 million with no NHS.

A quick look at the Scottish rugby, football and cricket teams should tell us how they fare when they are left to sort it out themselves ????. Bitter infighting followed by embarrassing results.

The more I think about it the more I support Scottish "independence". They can board the EU train right before it crashes off the rails. It will be highly amusing.

8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Sorry you don't like it apparently that she's not a Brit...

 

But, prior to marrying Harry, she had a long-running, major role in a mainstream, quite popular U.S. major network TV drama, for which she was pretty well regarded.

 

Where did I mention anything about her not being a Brit? 

Nothing to do with her nationality, race or any other strawman that you can dream up. It's her actions that I dislike.

If the ITV documentary/interview she did is an indication of her acting skills, she might want to try something else as I (and everyone else I spoke to who saw it) could see right through her faux emotions.

I see she's run away back to Canada after dropping the bomb on Instagram yesterday (which by the way is Kate's birthday, perfect timing). Yet another first class long haul flight. Saving the planet one day at a time.

4 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

You've kind of supported the argument from Brexiteers in England there. I.e., why do some Scots object to leaving the EU but want to leave the 300+ year old union with it's closest neighbour and biggest trading partner? 

It's simple. They'd rather be ruled by Brussels than Westminster. If they wanted true independence they'd be wanting to leave the UK but not join the EU.

Basically they want to go part time. Pop back for the occasional visit when they get bored, fly back on private jets, stay in the mansions that the taxpayer renovated for them, that type of thing.

They want to be celebrities rather than Royals. Hopefully all Royal money is cut off, then they can do whatever they like.

Harry has played himself, totally manipulated into cutting off his family by some B movie actress. Weak. 

3 hours ago, sandyf said:

Scotland voted as Unionists, and they are still Unionists, they want to be part of the European Union. Something the English nationalists fail to understand.

 

And there I was thinking they wanted independence.

Turns out they want to be an insignificant minnow in a huge federalist project.

24 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So in leaving the EU the UK determines timing and the EU doesn't get a vote.

But in leaving the UK Scotland doesn't determine and the UK gets a vote.

 

Hypocritical much?

Scotland had a vote and voted Remain in 2014. But the nationalists don't like the result so they want another go.

If the UK had voted to Remain in the EU in 2016, would you be advocating another Brexit referendum to leave just 6 years later? 

Why not have one every year until the stupid electorate give the 'correct' result. After all, how can more votes be less democratic, right? ????