englishoak

CCP advertising stooge.. 

I don't think  Xi's 0 policy  is going to align with anything tourism related for quite some time to come, if ever.                                            

Monkey pox is nothing new or a growing problem, its just the latest media and health scare hype to focus on  and part of this new and disgusting control cycle we are going to see being ramped up this decade.

If you pay attn to the scaremonger threats and "experts " claims of whats coming...pandemic after pandemic blah blah blah  you should realise this is all being engineered as continuing excuses to keep people in constant fear and disruption of living normally as before. Rolled out in tandem with other control methods  tech and changing policies most govs have already signed up to.. their job is to scare their populations into accepting ever more draconian controls.

Universal media stories, simultaneous statements,  key words and slogansa being used by the usual control freaks globally should make it laughable but there are plenty just waiting for the next current thing to panic over... and TPTB will use it to the max if the people allow it.. This should be all too obvious by now.. agenda 2030 is a real goal  not a myth. 

Sadly conditioning and control  by fear is a very effective method and increasingly becoming the weapon of choice by most governments and they will go as far as their populations allow them to go....

Might not help the OP but when confronted with classic  NPD this works best for me. 

Add new user to ignore list

Enter a member's name to set ignore options

• • GammaGlobulin ×

Trust me, im  a Doctor LOL ????

6 minutes ago, BE88 said:

It's like saying never

Most likely outcome.....

Just get everyone to grow that herb, job done.

21 hours ago, GrandPapillon said:

told you AZ was not effective ????

 

Oh its effective as much as any of the jabs are, they do exactly as intended which is to reduce the severity in most cases. 
They do increase "protections " as claimed but are far from what people traditionally expect from a "vaccine" or what most have been led to believe a vaccine does. 

Having a jab won't stop you getting it. eg 47% of recorded cases in the UK last week were already vaccinated. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9790999/Symptom-tracking-app-claims-number-people-falling-ill-virus-day-FALLEN.html

Itll last until it burns out and no measures,emergency, draconian r otherwise in a globally connected world will stop it

Just saying

If you are in a risk category maybe its worth it,but if your healthy probably not the best idea to mix and match any  emergency allowed  "vaccine" without any proper or long term risk data at all.

Based and red pilled 

3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

From the article:

"There is little or no direct evidence that virulence decreases over time. While newly emerged pathogens, such as HIV and Mers, are often highly virulent, the converse is not true. There are plenty of ancient diseases, such as tuberculosis and gonorrhoea, that are probably just as virulent today as they ever were."

In addition, as the author pointed out, the decline in virulence of the myxoma virus from 95- to 90 percent was taken as proof of the  validity of the theorem. But as the author points out:

"There was little subsequent decline in virulence after Fenner’s early reports, and it may even have risen slightly."

It should also be pointed out the even if the theorem is true in the long run, Covid 19 hasn't been on the scene for even 2 years. And more virulent forms have developed. Particularly, it seems,  the Lambda variant.

Sorry but i dont see anything proving anything to be concerned about there... Virulence isnt an issue and thats all I see the article pushing... we have lots of viruses constantly mutating and doing the rounds all the time, some seasons they can take quite a toll,  im not going to fret about the possibilities of another one...

Dont you get tired of being scared ?

22 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Not necessarily

https://theconversation.com/will-coronavirus-really-evolve-to-become-less-deadly-153817

That article  if you read it properly as I have  is just an opinion scare piece could be,maybe,possibility... I see no factual examples or confirmed data only possibilities... its possible ill win the lottery  but seeing as i dont buy lottery tickets,highly unlikely.  

Viruses that are stable like TB  or smallpox are just as deadly as they ever were, dont spread easily thus allowing for very effective vaccines over time and thats great. However viruses that mutate ( are unstable ) do so in order to thrive and spread easier, there is a payoff for that however,keeping its host alive. Dead hosts dont help a virus to thrive and spread. To date without fail and that i can see even with your linked article there is no proven  exception so far... thankfully  ????  

Unless some biolab gets in the way and tweaks things again. Ill side with nature thx.

Thats nice of him...what about the other 56 positions hes taking the money for ?

3 hours ago, sucit said:

Let’s have a little lesson here. 
 

Virus variants infecting hosts with an effective vaccine get weeded out of the genome. In short, we eliminate the genomes the virus works against. Ok, great! 
 

Due to variation within the virus, some variants are resistant to the vaccines, maybe all of them. Result, these variants propagate. 
 

If you are following, we now have a situation where time has past and all we have left are the variants that are resistant to the vaccines. There will always be some of these variants who are resistant to any vaccine we produce, and since this all started with one infected individual… (deduce deduce deduce). 

You forgot the important part, nature means viruses that are subject to variants always become less deadly at the expense of better transmission.  Without fail all become less deadly not more and eventually virtually harmless. We know this is the case throughout history...now that dosnt mean a variant wont be existing jabs resistant but it does mean its highly likely to be much less  dangerous, like the Delta variation,more transmissible but much much less deadly than the original. 

Trust in nature, shes had more experience keeping balance than all humans that have ever lived combined.

Do people really think a Thai when mega hungry is going to just sit and put up with it for long ?

Not a chance,just ask your wife if Thai. 

People really need to think and appreciate  what the media does and how it reports. Come on people use your heads and logic,its like every article is treated  here now like its true.Talk about being gullible...Im calling utter rubbish on the article..

57 minutes ago, colinneil said:

Tougher measures, he has completely lost the plot, tougher measures should have been put in place in april.

Cancelling songkran, but no the plonker thought he knew better, look what has happened due to his negligence.

Terrible situation now, many people dying due to government stupidity.

Its called Democide, nothing new about that with Thailand....

In the absence of a time machine to change the past.............. now what ?

2 hours ago, SCOTT FITZGERSLD said:

are you sure about it? do you even know what is going on in all thailand?

anyway, when i said starvation i meant poverty, depresion, desperation, ext.

i once asked a poor girl from isarn what the people there do if they need expensive

health care or special diet ext. and they cannot afford it?

she answered innocently: they die.

this is indeed what happans to many poor people when they get a serious illness, or need more nutrition than the twice daily som tam. but nobody counts them. the statistics are just

lies.

Ahhh  you meant life in general ? fair enough, its no different all over the world though really,plenty on the poverty line, depressed, desperate  etc literally most planet falls into those categories,1st 2nd or 3rd world.

Sure people die, Its just reality but starvation in the dictionary term  i assure you is not a thing in Thailand 

12 hours ago, OJAS said:

I suspect that most of us Brits feel more than a little jealousy towards both the French and Chinese because their governments have sanctioned vaccination programmes for their respective expat communities here through local hospitals using vaccine doses which are surplus to requirements back home.

 

On the other hand, dear ol' Boris has instead decided to cheerfully give away all vaccine doses which are surplus to requirements in the UK to poorer countries, instead of earmarking some of them to find their way into the arms of British expats here with the assistance of local hospitals. I can only infer that this "generous" gesture on ol' Boris's part is primarily motivated by a desire to mitigate the effects of his decision to cut the UK's overseas aid budget of which these poorer countries are the principal beneficiaries, and that, as a result, he has absolutely no problem with British expats here being, in effect, offered up as sacrificial lambs on the high altar of Saving Face through denying us entitlement to surplus UK COVID-19 vaccine doses.

 

You could always take responsibility for yourself and pop back home and get it  anytime, only a bit of effort required.

Imagine Thailand getting as concerned about 75 dead on the roads  ? 

Oh well