mokwit

Should point out that there is extra seating on the roof ahead of takeoff.

It's all deflections, tactics and snidey put down attempts with this NPC (see above for definition 🤣)

Not the sharpest tool in the shed are we Chomper? It's also used politically, it makes that clear in what I posted. Unfortunately to understand that would require thinking rather than posting a link, and that is where you came unstuck. 'Following the analogy of non-player characters, the NPC meme is used to mock individuals the maker perceives as lacking introspection, individual opinions, or critical thinking, generally political opponents.' Better def: NPC (Non Player Character) "NPC" stands for "Non-Player Character" and is used as a metaphor to describe someone who is perceived as lacking independent thought or blindly following trends. What is the meaning of NPC? The term originates from video games and refers to characters that are controlled by the game's artificial intelligence (AI)ia-glossary/ai/ rather than by actual players. On social media, "NPC" is often used as a metaphor or memes://later.com/social-media-glossary/meme/ to describe someone who blindly follows popular opinion without critical thinking. It implies that the person in question conforms to societal or political ideologies without questioning or expressing unique viewpoints. How is NPC (Non-Player Character) used on social media? The term "NPC" is typically used in online discussions, debates, or political discourse as a way to criticize or dismiss someone's arguments or perspectives. It suggests that the person is merely regurgitating scripted responses or adhering to a predetermined set of beliefs without engaging in independent reasoning or original thought. It is important to note that the use of "NPC" as an insult or derogatory term can be divisive and can contribute to unproductive online interactions. It is always advisable to engage in respectful and constructive dialogue when discussing differing opinions or viewpoints on social media. https://later.com/social-media-glossary/npc/

pathetic snidey response from you as always. Seems you weren't able to defend your position, because you didn't have one.

You spelt kleptocracies wrong.

Link?

The GBP 22b 'Holeohoax™' used to justify reneging on promises and "tough choices". Still waiting for that itemised breakdown from Reeves - could easily fill it if it existed by taking back the GBP22b given to Millibrand to disburse amongst his cronies. Tough choices always seem to be against British people.

It is this. Chulalongkorn and other tertiary Bangkok hospitals are having the same problem due to people choosing to go there because they now can.

If they had gone along purely to fact find, and thus not knowing if they were going to support WASPI or not they would hardly have had their photo taken with them as that would be construed as support. the alternative of course is that they are too thick to understand this, all four of them in the Cabinet. Rayner: "We will right that injustice" Is that fact finding? no. So actually we do know. You are trying (and failing) to defend the indefensible. THEY LIED.

So now you are saying they just went along on a fact finding mission? Rubbish and you know it. You really are scrabbling to defend these liars. They clearly went there and had their photo taken with the campaigners to show that they allied themselves with them. They were trying to drum up support for themselves, certainly what Rayner said indicates that they were SUPPORTING not fact finding.

Well, why were they campaigning alongside the WASPI campaigners and saying they would support them? I think most reasonable people would assume that was their policy or WHY WERE THEY DOING IT? Just to make false promises to get elected it seems. What you are saying is all that campaigning is not to be relied upon, they can seemingly annul their promises by not including them in the manifesto. It is YOU and ONLY YOU who is clinging to this pathetic letter of the manifesto defence.

You are the only one who thinks this, but really it is tactics isn't it? try and insert a definition favourable to you into the discussion and then try and hold the discussion to the terms you have created. I reiterate, whether of not it can be defined as a U Turn is irrelevant, it is quite simple RENEGING on campaign promises. You are not arguing convincingly here at all. In fact YOU DON"T HAVE AN ARGUMENT. You are just dishonestly trying to defend a bunch of people who told lies to get elected and then take money from the elderly to give it away to other countries.

That's YOUR definition. You are trying to control the terms of the debate with this U turn definition tactic. I'm not falling for these Bolshevik language tactics. It is about RENEGING on promises very publicly made as part of campaigning. Nothing to do with whether or not it is a U turn, just quite simply promising something and then RENEGING. This is seemingly the definition of everyone except you. What part of this don't you understand? Again if you are saying that they can promise anything and then just defend going back on that by not including it in a manifesto then that is not the conduct expected of politicians in the UK and hasn't been for centuries. Starmer and his cabinet who campaigned on this issue and then RENEGED are not fit to govern.

Salisbury convention on second and third readinsg and manifesto is completely irrelevant to Politicians promoting themselves on an issue for years and then going back on it once in power - or are you saying that they can just erase all that and the promises made by just omitting it from the mainfesto? If that was a deliberate strategy or their defence, they are utterly dishonest scum and completely unfit to govern.

Non Player Character - basically used to describe someone who can't think for themselves. Following the analogy of non-player characters, the NPC meme is used to mock individuals the maker perceives as lacking introspection, individual opinions, or critical thinking, generally political opponents. NPC (meme) - Wikipedia Wikipedia It is not me who can't think for themselves, I just use memes to save typing or to enhance/illustrate a point, or for fun. the board can judge this for themselves.

You are clearly positing that what is in the manifesto counts when it suits your cause e.g. trying defend a POLICY U TURN.

You really have some kind of problem with 'ripped memes' - a bit rich coming from the biggest NPC on this board - all you do is spout what Leftie Central puts out there. Face it you are defending LIARS.

Hardly a baseless assertion based on what has already gone down. You are saying Governments can choose to more than what's in the manifesto and then saying only what was in the letter of the manifesto counts. You can't have it both ways, you can't play both ends against the middle (jaab plaa song muua).

'Governments can choose to do more than what’s in their manifesto.' Appalling dishonesty machnations and backflips from you. It was a planned strategy that was DELIBERATELY withheld from the public as it would not be popular. The intention to rub the Tories (and the electorates) noses in diversity was only talked about in private.

As far as Labour Governments are concerned the part manifestos play in election and Government is very clear, it is just some BS you come out with to sound good to the electorate and then you just get on with what you really had planned that wouldn't have got you elected.

Lies and omissions, clearly.

There is no reason not to play this other than totalitarian political control to control the image of the Dear Leader.

GBP 22bn for Millibrand to siphon off amongst his cronies is though, along with other multibillion gifts.

Agree. They are not supposed to be deliberate deception to get elected and then get down to what they really had planned (sounds familiar).

Where was it in the Blair Government manifesto that they were going to open the floodgates to mass immigration and top down enforced multiculturalism?. A Labour manifesto means NOTHING.