mokwit

Guilty pleas were required in order to get the sentencing press releases and videos out quickly and also because with a guilty plea in all but the most egregious mismatch between the law and the facts* less burden of proof is required than with a NG plea and trial. Looking at the way these laws are written makes this possible IMO. Pressure from the Police, possible innocent or malicious misrepresentation of the severity of sentence likely to be received by advising solicitor. *a judge can rule that the case should not have been brought if the points of law needed to be met to secure a conviction are not met, but with a guilty plea they would have to stand out in stark relief for that to happen.

All of whom are meant to be independent of each other. IMO the convictions need to be looked at to see if they are unsafe.

You edited out 'The usual insult/smearing as per Bolshevik tactics.'

Like Nick Lowles, or does he get special exemption for trying to inflame tensions?

The usual insult/smearing as per Bolshevik tactics. We already know, how come you seemingly don't?

For some reason Nick Lowles of the Labour party affiliated Hope not hate is not in prison for inflaming the situation tweeting that someone had thrown acid into the face of a muslim woman and that mosques would be attacked in multiple towns. Likewise Jesse Phillips (Labour).

Seems Chomper was stating as fact that neither Islam or muslims had any part without proof. He needs to hold himself to the same standards he demands from others.

So roughly in line with inflation then.

Probably because it will go to recently set up environmental consultancies etc.

Bus fares capped at GBP3 not GBP2 will affect the lowest earners etc etc

The footage is online. Seems all some people did was tweet. Interestingly someone who pleaded not guilty was found not guilty.

The Government is so out of touch I wouldn't rule out riots from the working class as a possible response.

Not engaging in online speculation hopefully will also put you at less risk of Merseyside police videoing themselves dragging you out of your home and put in a cage.

Truly awful people. I can't understand why Chomper thinks so highly of "Sir" Keier Starmer - especially as the appointment to head of CPS carries an automatic Knighthood and is made by the Attorney General who is a political appointment (made by the Monarch as recommended by the PM). Now, who was PM at the time and did his wife ever work for Matrix chamber as a ""yuuman rights" lawyer.

Rubbish. The Government has to give an explanation. Everybody should be demanding it from them. People are sick and tired of the withholding and misrepresentation of information with a political agenda.

'.....What we do know, from bitter experience, is that any crime which may or may not turn out to have an Islamist or jihadist component is treated with extreme defensiveness and secrecy by the police, government, security services and Left-wing commentators. The pattern goes something like this: a. Suppress information on the identity and ethnicity of the suspect (most likely revealed by the media). b. Criticise perfectly understandable public speculation and anger about the alleged attacker. c. Deny the attack is related to terrorism. Also deny the alleged attacker was ever on the radar of the security services. d. Once alleged attacker’s identity is revealed, release sweet, angelic childhood photo. Also emphasise good character of alleged attacker – he wanted to be an architect, helped old ladies cross the road, neighbours said what a lovely chap, etc - and don’t mention any previous criminal record or negative comments. e. Police issue stern warning about online “misinformation”. Narrative shifts as fast as possible to disgusting “hate speech” on social media and away from truly disgusting killings. f. Prominent Left-wing commentators fret about “disinformation” and “Islamophobia” and don’t mention names of victims who are quickly forgotten. g. Politicians avoid awkward conversations about failures of multiculturalism, mass immigration and lack of integration and suggest the solution may be more online censorship. (After the murder of Sir David Amess, MPs in the Commons actually said the lesson of his killing by a young, knife-wielding jihadist was that politicians needed to be nicer to each other. Yes, really.) h. Public encouraged to participate in touching displays of peaceful commemoration and reconciliation. (Don’t Look Back in Anger is what crowds sang after the mass murder of young people and their parents by a suicide bomber at an Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena.) i. Cancel all of the above if attacker turns out to be far-Right and white. Phew! Huge relief all round. j. News cycle moves on past horrific crime and postpones any further discussion of the causes until a trial and/or public inquiry makes such embarrassing disclosures hard to avoid.' .... 'Tory leadership contender Robert Jenrick issued a hard-hitting video on Tuesday saying that, while the legal process needs to be respected, he was seriously concerned that the facts may have been withheld from the public. “The Government and authorities told us for months that they were not treating this as a terrorist incident,” Jenrick said. “This atrocity was of immense public concern. The public had the right to know the truth right away. Any suggestion of a cover-up will permanently damage trust in whether we are being told the truth about crime in our country.” He called on Keir Starmer to urgently reveal to the country what he knew about the Southport attack and when. “Across the board, the hard reality of mass migration is being covered up. The public can see with their own eyes that they are being gaslit by the liberal elite.” ' https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/29/the-southport-child-victims-deserve-better/

It has been 3 months now, and they only comes out with the charges after they moved the court date until after the London patriots march, or did the police only find this evidence yesterday. What are you expecting? That the Home Office has a web page I can link to saying they deliberately withheld this information? Laughable. They released his name even though he was underage IMO in the hope that a non muslim name would allay fears that this was a jihadist attack, so why wouldn't they withhold the information that it was. In circumstances like this you have to use judgement and my judgement is that it was deliberately withheld. BTW Chomper I misremembered something last time - the ISIS magazine gives the instruction that POST pubescent children are acceptable terrorist targets, they state that very young children (and women) are to be taken as slaves. Sorry, I mixed up murdering pre pubescent with post pubescent. my bad.

There are videos from US floods on youtube giving the things to look for to spot if it is a flood damaged car - dealers transported them across the country to non flood areas to sell them - less suspicion of flood damage.

You forgot the ones probably known to their fellow "peaceful" worshipers.

The information wasn't available because it was deliberately withheld.

Nick Lowles Hope not Hate and a Labour MP were NOT jailed for spreading misinformation designed to incite.

A relic from before humour was frowned upon.

I categorically stated HARD Left. They effectively were communists, although it is unlikely even the stated ones could recite the Communist manifesto - it was really about having a license to hate.. It was well known that students at my college were invited to "fact finding" tours in the USSR. If the Hard Left who advocate Trotskyism aren't Communists, what are they? If Red Robbo wasn't a Communist, what was he? officially a trade unionist and Labour party member.

I heard that St Kitts is much nicer than an Isaan village for aging. senile hypocrites.