thaibeachlovers

Unless they are Native Americans they have to be immigrants or children of immigrants.

I'd vote for anyone that insulted Harris and Clinton on my behalf. I doubt either of them read AN.

The market decides the economy, not politicians.

If she was as good as posters on here make her out to be she'd be shredding Trump in polls, but she can't get ahead by more than a smidgen, and that's while she's still in the honeymoon phase.

I think you meant to write 2020 and got confused.

My fear is that Harris will do so little that the sheeple don't know the truth till it's too late. It'll be interesting to see how she gets on in the debate. Perhaps she will bring him along to hold her hand during that too.

Huh? He doesn't fit any description of the antiChrist in Revelations. Has to be people that don't know much about it making it up. Revelations is so ambiguous that no one actually knows what it's about and it could be made to fit almost any time in history. Mind you when I see the four horsemen of the Apocalypse riding down Main Street, I'll keep a look out for the antiChrist.

So many excuses. Depends on the individual concerned. Does Trump have no respect for disabled as a whole? I don't know, but perhaps you can inform us with some proof if he doesn't. I have had a great deal to do with the disabled, probably more than most abled bodied, and most don't want to be treated differently or pitied. They'd rather be a person with an impediment than a cripple to be treated differently. They don't even like being called a cripple- it's derogatory.

Keep dreaming. Harris is so awful that people have to realise it. There is still time for the honeymoon to end and the horrid reality to sink in.

LOL, LOL. People can walk you know. If the wall stops them at one place they will just move to where the wall isn't and cross there. If they can cross the Darien a few hills aren't going to stop them. Going on that basis, why did China build the Great Wall on top of all those hills? They could have spent the money on a few more cute wives for the Emperor.

Strangely, it seems as though conflict and persecution only apply to fit young men. Western countries are not responsible if the countries they are "fleeing from", apparently with enough money to pay criminals to transport them, have become economic disasters full of criminals. The west is not obliged to give a job to every person that feels hard done by in their own country. Most already have visas for those that want to work, and then go home.

You are so polite. That's not what I'd have written.

Not surprising considering they are probably liberals, that just give lip service to stopping the criminal invasion. So much for those that say the boats can't be stopped. Repeat that a few times and no one will be paying criminal gangs to transport them any more. In better news, the potential criminal illegal immigrants apparently ended up in Morocco, and were not given a free ride to Spain. Perhaps the coast guard should have given the boat driver a free ride to a lengthy prison sentence in a Spanish prison.

Accountants can be replaced by a machine. A plumber or electrician can not ( yet ).

When they are old enough to live on their own.

You said it better that I could. Simples- there is more profit to be made in war than peace, and IMO the US is all about profit for the 1%. After all, it was they that made Americans unemployed so they could make more profit by exploiting poor Chinese. Now that China has become advanced through the money and tech that the US gave to them to make that profit it's coming back to bite the US. Perhaps they are depending on Musk to escape to Mars when it all goes wrong.

IMO neither. The future is obviously in unmanned planes, and mass produced with less advanced technology. Without a pilot they will be able to fly at speeds far beyond the ability of a human pilot and will not need to be stealthy. I'm guessing, but IMO the days of dog fights are long gone and it's just delivering cruise missiles or such like to a target.

See my previous post.

It's classic political diversion. Look at this nothing burger while I'm destroying the country stuff.

The best "normal" country I ever lived in was Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore in the 70s. No one disrespected the police, it was safe, there were no layabouts living off other people's money, People all had somewhere to live, enough to eat. No drones like influencers and lobbyists. The government wasn't full of liberals trying to spend other people's money on stupid social idiocies, and there was basically no corruption at any level. People say it was akin to dictatorship. Perhaps it was, but it was a better country to live in than any western country I have lived in.

I actually lived and worked in a ( small ) community for a year where we needed no money. Yes we got everything we needed for free, including medical and dental. Of course, none of us were criminals, we all had jobs which we did without protest or striking, and there were no drones ie politicians, police, teachers etc. I'd rather live in a society like that than one driven by greed and full of criminals and drones.

Actually there is no question, IMO. Technology makes money, so the 1% will "own" tech for their own benefit. As usual something that could set humans free from the grind of hard labour, illness, and poverty will be used to make even more profit for the few. In this Brave New World of ours greed is everything. Don't expect government to change it- politicians IMO are craven servants of the 1%, with their backdoor bribery, lobbyists and financial support during elections.

Shall we set up re education camps to instill a sense of hard work in the feckless workers, so the employers can exploit them more easily to make more profit? Some of us worked to make a living. Perhaps others inherited their money.

It's too late. The liberal policies have been embedded ( how can the US deport 10 million or so illegal immigrants that have been allowed to put down roots? Same as in all western countries that have allowed millions of them in. The only answer to it, IMO, short of something really nasty, is to stop any more coming in and cracking down on the criminals with really long non parole sentences or voluntary repatriation.

Prove it, or it isn't true.