Slip

"on the same side"? Congratulations on the most vapid infantile post on this long thread packed with them.

The only ones you manage to identify with any attempt at some sort of proper name are "the white dudes". Colour me unsurprised. A mole- like as in a spy?

I see you have been suitably humiliated for this post already, but really, try to establish some balance in your view. Edit: This. Thank you. I guess sometimes you have to labour a point because it can be forgotten quickly in a thread as monstrous as this. MrMogoRisin said:

This boils down to- an accusation is made by one side with no evidence to support it and is then disproved, you believe said propaganda, then you project that on to prove your thesis. It doesn't work well.

Literally NOTHING you post can be trusted. I don't know why you are still posting. You have zero credibility except to those looking to confirm their own biases.

You may note I said "well informed" not "expert". However you are exactly one of the people who thrashes a partisan line with dozens of posts: Just the kind of person I was discussing. Piers Morgan is an abomination and by no means good or unbiased, but I have no idea if he is antisemitic or not. But I believe we all have a horse in the race one way or another. EDIT: I meant to say that TRT world (Turkey) is still reporting it as an Israeli air attack despite all evidence otherwise.

By mistake. Oh dear. For someone who posts incessantly on this thread you don't seem to be very well informed. The Arabic parties cancelled the meeting. I have avoided posting on these threads before so far. The behaviour of both Hamas and the Israeli government are abhorrent, but watching posters of either ilk misrepresenting the situation to cast blame only on the other side is equally appalling.

With this current crop, I'm not sure their base level isn't narcistic sociopathy., but of course with the greed mixed in.

You're aiming too low. By his flock, he will be regarded as nothing short of the new messiah! Well, he's not, he's a very naughty boy. However, who cares how he is regarded on release? Most just want to regard him in a flaming orange jumpsuit to match his skin tone.

So now we see why Wet Walt or whatever his name is floated this trial balloon from the op in the first place. More manipulation and nonsense from MAGA.

Utter drivel.

deleted- no need to get involved.

I comprehend that all your post managed to do is demonstrate once again your obvious bias. You claim the basis would be 'reasonable doubt' but with your bias you are not qualified to make that assessment.

There is no way you would be on such a jury. You would be weeded out as having obvious bias (assuming you answered questions truthfully).

Surely just as it should be? Denying a child access to their soon to be/ recently departed parent should not be on the whims of a corporate supervisor. Such is a life changing moment and profit shouldn't hold sway.

I'm not telling you what you are thinking. I'm telling you that your behaviours are on display whether you admit it or not. As I've said many times, I do understand your feelings about the matter. On that note, thanks for the conversation but I don't think we'll agree so I'm bowing out.

Not true. You can and you are. Again, I understand it, but when you say "Just a miserable, lonely existence knowing everyone around her wants her dead." it expresses the desire succinctly. The justice system is rammed with revenge. And again I'm not making comment on it.

It's not for me to decide what form your anticipated revenge would take. Don't get me wrong- I do understand the desire, but I recognise it for what it is.

He isn't talking about criminal justice. He is talking about revenge.

Good- I hope they throw the book at her.

Fine- Incarcerate him while he awaits trial and give him all the time he needs.

But they don't only make the claim. They make the claim and say they have proof which will be available any day soon, but no proof is ever forthcoming.

It's enough to point out your hypocrisy.

Q, Is that you?