Slip

Crooked republican makes claims with no evidence; suckers lap it up.

I think it's the Book of Hilary the Redeemer, Chapter 3, not sure of the verse.

For the fourth time? Every time you make the same ridiculous point it emphasises that it is the tories who have sleep-walked into this debacle. As I had to say to you in the end last night- I have better things to do with my time, so I'm done here. Enjoy your day/ evening.

You can <deleted> into the wind all you like. The tories have failed to manage their uk immigration responsibly in the 13 years they have been in power and have created a cluster-**** that they are now flailing around trying to blame on the most abject powerless people. They will be gone at the next GE thanks be to your deity of choice.

It's a theory. Here's another. It's basically the same as yours but recognises the fault of the present government in the issue: The UK population has finally started to take note of the dreadful mess the tories have made of governing the country (including immigration) in their time in power. The immigration/ refugee nonsense helps them to manipulate the (dwindling) daily mail readers who are still willing to vote for them.

Are trans people demanding to change their date of birth on a driving licence? I agree that seems ridiculous. I will leave you to report back on the rest if you actually find anything of note.

I see you are in full agreement with Chomper's [most excellent] point: I wonder how they can mess it up worse than the present shambles.

Luckily for you the post right below you answers your question and points out the fallacy of your hand-wringing. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/over-120-bills-restricting-lgbtq-rights-introduced-nationwide-2023-so-far You may be happy to deny the rights of other people dependent on your life view, but most (happily) are not.

Colonisation?

Don't forget your meds before your hot milk.

Seemingly for ever, and ever, and ever... ????

Agreed. The irresponsible reporting and flimsy journalism is all the responsibility of the newspaper. I would be interested to know if there is any nugget of truth in their report or they're making it up as usual. No doubt more details will emerge. Many people seem to be commenting on gadd's early release which is perhaps a better (and more on topic) focus than the guttersnipe ethics of Murdoch's rags.

Agreed. I take most issue with their lies and hypocrisy, but of course we are way off topic here, so I'll leave it there.

That's the thing really- it's just dreadful sensationalist journalism. Is 'being suspected of' enough to trigger the recall or is there a need for evidence, did he really try to access the dark web, or did he just make an enquiry about tor? Regardless, I have no sympathy for the dreadful man.

Using tor is not any sort of evidence of accessing the dark web though. Perhaps he was banned from using anonymizing procedures? But as Bradiston says the Sun, like so many of the right wing papers, just spout disinformation to manipulate their audience. Like in Murdoch's Fox, facts are to be avoided in Murdoch's Sun.

Try not to offer unsolicited advice with no basis in reality or the topic. Other than that I have no interest in your bloviating.

Do you think Gary Lineker and I have conversations about UK immigration policy. Another ridiculous attempt to troll from the far-right board members.

What nonsense you alt right people talk, you can't help but misrepresent everything you come across. The tories will be in the bin soon. Here is an actual holocaust survivor proving the point.

Nice one Gary. You speak for the best of us. Not like some of the poison infecting our country. Nice to see the ongoing slide to medium term oblivion on the part of the nasty/tory party. I thought Thatcher was bad enough, but this mob are soulless ghouls.

Perhaps you would not, but your own words above prove the point. Anyway, as I said, I am not criticising your stance. (Nice to have a pleasant discussion with you about this on this occasion, but no more from me).

I'm surprised to see that comment from arch troll Piers Morgan. He must be trying to improve his 'woke' credit rating to launch another attack on civility and decency.

You may feel it is a noble one, but what you have just described about your motivations is literally a perfect example of having an agenda. (Not to comment on the agenda itself or your resultant views.)

Again thanks for posting the links. My comment about 'not cutting the mustard' was a personal one about sources I'm willing to trust. Your first link is unfortunately useless as it is just a list of twitter comments pushing an unfounded opinion. The second is better though. I don't know what BARB is but at least it gives a potential anchor in reality and objectivity. Funny it's a left wing tabloid though.

Thank you for posting the link vinny41. Apparently member "champers" is too important to follow the rules. EDIT TO ADD: There is no source to the only data which is that provided in the spectator link. They are a tory rag so I'm afraid it doesn't cut the mustard.

Post a link or delete you post.