Jump to content

nauseus

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    18,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by nauseus

  1. Nasty echo in here.
  2. Not a gun but enormous pressure, after 3 years of May's messing about, only ending up with that so-called "Chequers Agreement" failure. In Boris's haste to pick up the gauntlet and get Brexit done, he only succeeded in minor changes to that agreement - that was all done to quickly in the end but it is one reason why Brexit is such a mess, even though, technically, we are out. Yes, responsibility lies with UK governments - not only the recent ones but also the Heath regime of 1972 and after that - if there had been referendums held then, and before each major treaty signing, then we would either have never joined in the first place or been out long ago. There is no requirement for a withdrawal agreement but after so long as a member, then a sensible one is obviously best, especially w.r.t. all EU and UK citizens rights and status. Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty is worded so simply and briefly, that anyone reading it might assume that it would be easy to leave the EU but these words are rather meaningless to any member trying to extract itself from the rats maze that the EU has become after successive treaties, over decades. The EU reaction after the referendum revealed its fear that the UK leaving might mean the disintegration of the EU itself. by prompting others to follow suit. The post referendum vengeful behaviour of the EU commissioners has now been seen and noted around the continent and the world - they would have been far better off being more reasonable and, using their own words, acted in "good faith".
  3. Socialists at Fox News? 555
  4. No idea what you're on about.
  5. Most fairly assumed that leaving meant leaving the EU and all of its control, The so-called withdrawal agreement did not allow that, as everyone can see now.
  6. Just taking a breather?
  7. I was not the one doing the positing.
  8. Not a problem. Nigel Farage took all mine.
  9. You can think that if you want.
  10. Maybe because the campaigning hasn't even started yet. It is a bit early after all plus there's Thanksgiving and Christmas coming up. Maybe he'll kick off on J6?
  11. Scott Reed is a failed GOP campaign manager, who also failed to win a run for state rep in 2016 and who then left the US Chamber of Commerce under a cloud in 2020. Yahoo.
  12. Who are you talking about?
  13. nauseus

    Patpong

    Frank yes.
  14. nauseus

    Patpong

    Spot on - the tipping point as they say.
  15. Well as you put it that way, then I expect he has behaved honorably.
  16. You said honorable. I said legal.
  17. Sounds like an acid attack.
  18. whatever turns you on.
  19. I think that DT divested the executive leadership of the Trump Organization to his sons before 2016 but that's what I was trying to infer by my question. Anyway, I'm sure that any remaining interest he might have is legal and above board - the legal aspect is what is really relevant - I think that these arrangements already exist from his first term.
  20. As for the copy that cbs used that they got from the shop owner, who said "its a clean copy" well we all know that does not fall in the remits of chain of custody.
  21. Lucan was pre laptop age but I have it on good advice that he was spotted in some 'select' Bangkok bars in the 80's. ????
  22. Read your own geeky link - it is not necessarily [immediately] thrown out of court - it might be. I was not referring to copies.
  23. Not sure why any amount of copies should negate the validity of the original. Think Mona Lisa .. and smile.
×
×
  • Create New...