rattlesnake

A word on virologist Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the Covid crisis, who claims that reports of so-called "Long Covid" are actually a cover-up for mRNA vaccine injury? Since leaving his federal government position at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in January 2021, Redfield has focused on treating patients in his medical practice. He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA “vaccine” they received. https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/

As I know your answer to the Peter McCullough question will be that he is not a virologist: A word on virologist Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the Covid crisis, who claims that reports of so-called "Long Covid" are actually a cover-up for mRNA vaccine injury? Since leaving his federal government position at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in January 2021, Redfield has focused on treating patients in his medical practice. He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA “vaccine” they received. https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/

A word on Peter McCullough, also mentioned in the OP? 1984: Graduated from Baylor University with a Bachelor in Science 1988: Graduated with a medical degree from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School 1991: Completed his residency at University of Washington School of Medicine 1991: Began his period as a medical attending at Mercy Hospital 1993: Studied his Masters degree in Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health 1994: Began his fellowship in cardiovascular diseases at the William Beaumont Hospital 1997: Joined the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute 2000: Appointed to serve as Section Chief of Cardiology of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Truman Medical Center 2002: Made a Consultant Cardiologist and Division Chief of Nutrition and Preventive Medicine at the William Beaumont Hospital 2010: Served as the Chief Academic and Scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System Current: Joined Baylor University Medical Center as Vice Chief of Internal Medicine and Chief of Cardiovascular Research of the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute

Any approach was good to reach the end goal, which was to vaccinate everybody to the brim. It's only when the criticisms started to appear that the "experts only" thing was pulled out of the hat. An amateur can inoculate the jab, but an amateur can't assess the jab's safety. No, that's the experts' job… And those experts who speak negatively of the jab are demoted from their expert status and become "discredited by the medical community", which is even worse than amateur status. So… only "experts" who speak positively of the jab may speak.

Most of the prostitutes on OnlyFans make a couple of hundred per month at most. It's like YouTube, an extreme minority make it big, the rest are empoverished wannabes with no skills or desire/ability to have a real job.

The Thais made him famous, he is one of the biggest YouTubers in the country, his content is exclusvely in Thai and tailored for Thai culture (I know because my young son watches him).

Sounds like BS identity politics. Thankfully, this absurd and nefarious ideology seems to be a thing of the past. CNN senior political commentator Van Jones speaks with a group of African Americans in South Carolina who explain why they voted for and continue to back President Donald Trump. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/01/politics/video/van-jones-south-carolina-black-voters-support-trump-digvid

"Not peer-revieeeeewed!!!", bleat the sheep.

Who could possibly deny this today?

Expect the sheep to bleat "But he's not a virologist!" in harmony (by the way, if only virologists are allowed to talk about this issue, then why were pharmacists giving vaccine advice to people?). Anyway, great example which a lot of people should follow.

No, they are not. Look at the data over the past decades. Which means the media is lying.

Megyn Kelly Still Battling VAIDS Caused by Covid Shot: ‘I Really, Really Regret Having Gotten the Vaccine’ “[W]e were lied to,” Kelly said, acknowledging others have had “worse” outcomes. “It was not an informed assumption of the risk,” she added. “There’s no question people have been hurt and even killed…I, for one, have learned a ton, but remain pissed off about how the whole thing was handled.” Last year, Kelly revealed that she had been “targeted” by the pharmaceutical industry after she went public about the side effects she suffered after receiving the Covid mRNA injection from Moderna. Kelly first revealed in September 2023 that she had been diagnosed with VAIDS. During an episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show,” the host asserted that her immune system was damaged by her Covid shot. https://slaynews.com/news/megyn-kelly-battling-vaids-covid-shot-really-regret-vaccine/

Doesn't change anything to the fact that he hits the nail square on the head.

Of course. And no need to project oneself to the 17th or 18th century. Pasteur's germ theory of disease (and that is what it is and called, a theory) is still refutable nowadays, and refuted it has been over time, by a plethora of respected and competent individuals such as Antoine Béchamp or Rudolf Virchow, who dismissed this notion that disease comes from outside the body rather than from within. Florence Nightingale also famously stated that in her experience, smallpox was not something that was “caught” from outside but grown from within.

So do I.

+1 to this, that was definitely my primary motivation when I got my first ones 20 years ago. Also, as I stated in the previous fornightly tattoo-bashing thread, I would be interested to see in what physical shape the 'educated' snobs on this forum are… That would put things into perspective.

I was disappointed too, by a lot of people and especially singers. I lost respect for several artists in recent years because of their political stances, from Springsteen to Tenacious D (both of whom I don't listen to anymore, they really put me off with their vaxx whoring). To me, the explanation is simple: ultimately, the upper class defends the privileges and interests of the upper class, and the fact that some of them are dressed, talk and behave like rebels does not change this elementary principle. The rule, which I try to apply scrupulously, is to not listen to anything else but their music. In my view, those artists shouldn't be talking about politics anyway, what do they know about the real world? PJ Harvey has my respect because she always refuses to answer political questions for that very reason. It's not her role, she says. I agree.

Shout-out to Andrew Bridgen, who will be remembered as the hero he is… hopefully in his lifetime.

That immediately reminded me of Terminator 2. "I need your clothes, your boots… and your vaccine passport."

The notion that "inflammation is the culprit" is shared by many and most probably correct. Therefore, a transparent and independent assessment of the recent dramatic increase in heart attacks should take into account all potential inflammatory factors. According to a September 2022 study (see below) by Cedars Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, heart attack deaths across all age groups have become more common in the U.S. since Covid, with a sharp increase in the 25-44 age bracket. Dr. Susan Cheng, a cardiologist at Cedars Sinai and co-author of the study, rightly stated that “Young people are obviously not really supposed to die of heart attack. They’re not really supposed to have heart attacks at all.” Covid infection is cited as one of the potential causes, which seems reasonable. Excess risk for acute myocardial infarction mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.28187 However, according to another peer-reviewed study published this month in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, young adults who received a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine showed elevated spike protein production a year or more after vaccination, which is significantly longer than the spike protein is said and expected to remain in the body. Participants exhibited elevated levels of multiple proinflammatory cytokines – the proteins which help regulate the immune system – signifying a persistent immune response to the messenger RNA. Altered Circulating Cytokine Profile Among mRNA-Vaccinated Young Adults: A Year-Long Follow-Up Study https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70194 This ties into a flurry of alarming medical research, which culminated recently with a call for a moratorium on the Covid shots following another peer-reviewed study citing “serious safety concerns” and potential long-term risks (see below), adding to the list of scientists and organizations that have supported halting the mRNA vaccines – including (among many others) Florida’s Surgeon General, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Doctors for Covid Ethics, Americans for Health Freedom and the World Council for Health: Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 modRNA Vaccines: Dangerous Genetic Mechanism of Action Released before Sufficient Preclinical Testing https://jpands.org/vol29no4/oldfield.pdf Now of course, if one chooses to refute and discredit the above, it is possible. Semantics, when used skillfully, can prove very effective in arguing just about any point, especially when one uses the reverse process of starting from the desired conclusion (e.g. "data shows vaccines are overwhelmingly safe") and building the argumentation from there. But I will make a couple of observations: 1. The fact that data still keeps appearing on the nefarious effects of the vaccine is not the result of an unfortunate mishap, nor rooted in some quirky social media-driven trend, nor the endeavour of discredited scientists motivated by non-scientific goals. No, the answer is much more straightforward: the reason why this isn't going away, three years after the end of the Covid crisis, is because there is something there. It's as simple as that. 2. It is easier than one thinks to let oneself be subjected to ideological denialism, a mindset through which one is so convinced one is right that rather than simply looking for the truth and taking data at face value, one adopts an 'upstream reasoning' process and embraces the conclusion before looking at the information, which can lead to major gaps in the dialectic process. I believe this could be what led you, in your above response, to go as far as citing dehydration as a possible reason for the spike in young cardiac deaths, without even leaving any space for the possibility that this could be at least partially caused by the vaccines.

Badass.

Incorrect, our ranks are growing fast, hence the threads such as (I am paraphrasing off the top of my head) "Conspiracy theorists, why so many and what can we do about them?" or "Why do people not follow science anymore?", etc. Anyone still pushing the controversial and unethical Covid jab is living in a dangerous and nefarious bubble. The medical profession has been seriously damaged these past five years, and it will take time to build back trust in it. Fortunately, there still are thousands of good physicians (those who were "discredited by the medical community" – a fancy synonym for "excommunicated").

Exactly.

Exactly. Their parents are criminals. I don't see a problem and it's not the US taxpayers' problem.

Indeed. "Peer-reviewed" ultimately just means a bunch a guys publicly took a cohesive stance. And in perhaps the most corrupt and influence-peddling systems ever to exist, well, let's say that stance is of limited relevance to say the least.