rattlesnake

I'm sure johng will give you details, but you can already check out the White House link I pasted above. Fauci is involved in the lab leak and gain of function research, which should already be enough to lock him up forever. Biden wouldn't have given him a blanket pardon if he wasn't a criminal.

Trannies never age well, after 50 no amount of surgery or makeup can hide the reality.

The age-old technique of focusing on a ridiculous claim in order to discredit an otherwise valid cause… Here is the reality: The White House's "The true origins of Covid" publication shows that the current administration knows Fauci was involved in several questionable processes, such as gain of function among others, and of course this should be accounted for and lead to prosecution, if the systemic corruption can be overcome. https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/

You expect better of me… Well, I certainly don't expect better of you. Your reaction was anticipated. Unlike you, I don't think in terms of 'victory' or 'defeat', however I can spot a sophist a mile away (which is why I told TallJohnInBkk that his only option here was to drop out). There is no way you can address the substance of the issue – one of the world's top virologists and former head of the CDC saying Long Covid is in fact vaccine injury – without admitting that a large part of what you have said and defended thus far is based on an erroneous premise. Given how far you've gone in your arrogant attitude towards the so-called "antivaxxers" (the two latest examples being yesterday's "Ill educated laymen suckered into believing social media rubbish because they suffer from authoritarian distrust" and today's "cesspit of mediocrity that the brain-dead anti-vax theatre wallows in"), it would take humility and honesty to acknowledge you were wrong and adjust your view, and I know you have neither, hence your dropping out of the debate, disguised as 'disengagement' and 'exasperation at the idiocy'.

Excellent. This is the founding myth (as evidenced by the Pavlovian tropes incessantly regurgitated on this forum), which must be exposed in all its fallacy.

A more accurate translation: the peer review process, while a good idea in theory, loses its validity when integrated in a system demonstrably based on conflicts of interest, influence peddling, coercion and threats. One example of many, former Australian MP Dr. Kerryn Phelps, who was initially pro-vaccine but changed her stance after she and her partner were both seriously injured: Dr Kerryn Phelps reveals ‘devastating’ Covid vaccine injury, says doctors have been ‘censored’ Dr Kerryn Phelps has broken her silence about a “devastating” Covid vaccine injury, slamming regulators for “censoring” public discussion with “threats” to doctors. […] She revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”. “Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she said. https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/dr-kerryn-phelps-reveals-devastating-covid-vaccine-injury-says-doctors-have-been-censored/news-story/0c1fa02818c99a5ff65f5bf852a382cf

You see, @TallGuyJohninBKK, this is what I meant when I said (and I see you have wisely followed the advice): Your best option is to do what the other sophists of this forum do in such cases, which is to drop out of the discussion entirely, wait for it to get buried, and start posting your talking points in another thread in a couple of days or so. A competent sophist knows when to back off. "Not biting" here means avoiding finding oneself in the uncomfortable position of having to face very inconvenient facts… which only honest people are able to do.

A word on virologist Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the Covid crisis, who claims that reports of so-called "Long Covid" are actually a cover-up for mRNA vaccine injury? Since leaving his federal government position at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in January 2021, Redfield has focused on treating patients in his medical practice. He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA “vaccine” they received. https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/

You're just proving my point, John. There is no talking your way out of this one. Your best option is to do what the other sophists of this forum do in such cases, which is to drop out of the discussion entirely, wait for it to get buried, and start posting your talking points in another thread in a couple of days or so.

This is what Dr. Redfield's peers had to say about him when he was appointed as CDC Director in 2018: “Dr. Redfield’s appointment to Director of CDC is a brilliant recognition of a great public health advocate, an excellent researcher, and one that has a life of dedication to public service. This appointment is refreshingly not about politics, but about quality, competence and compassion. Dr. Redfield encompasses all of those qualities and more.” Terry Lierman, Chairman of IHV’s Board of Advisors “Dr. Redfield is eminently qualified for this critical position. He has made a lifelong commitment to advancing biomedical research and human health through discovery-based medicine." Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA, Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs (UM Baltimore) and John Z. Akiko Bowers Distinguished Professor and Dean (University of Maryland School of Medicine) “Dr. Redfield has served his country well, and consistently demonstrates strong public health instincts that are grounded in science and clinical medicine. In my view, despite the loss to the Institute, I believe this makes him the ideal candidate to direct the CDC.” Dr. Gallo, Director and co-founder of the Institute of Human Virology (IHV) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland https://www.medschool.umaryland.edu/news/2018/dr-robert-redfield-co-founder-of-the-institute-of-human-virology-at-the-university-of-maryland-school-of-medicine-to-become-cdc-director.html Obviously, now that he is saying things he is not supposed to say, the above does not stand anymore. As explained yesterday in another thread, Dr. Redfield has now been demoted from "expert" to "discredited by the medical community" status.

Indeed, the story conflates compensation and medical bill coverage. Shouldn't the latter be covered under the 30 baht scheme? Why does she need to pay for this herself?

A word on virologist Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the Covid crisis, who claims that reports of so-called "Long Covid" are actually a cover-up for mRNA vaccine injury? Since leaving his federal government position at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in January 2021, Redfield has focused on treating patients in his medical practice. He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA “vaccine” they received. https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/

As I know your answer to the Peter McCullough question will be that he is not a virologist: A word on virologist Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as the director of the CDC during the Covid crisis, who claims that reports of so-called "Long Covid" are actually a cover-up for mRNA vaccine injury? Since leaving his federal government position at the end of President Donald Trump’s first term in January 2021, Redfield has focused on treating patients in his medical practice. He explains in the interview that his surgery is flooded with patients who have been led to believe they have “Lond Covid.” However, he notes that the vast majority of those patients are actually suffering from an injury caused by the Covid mRNA “vaccine” they received. https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/

A word on Peter McCullough, also mentioned in the OP? 1984: Graduated from Baylor University with a Bachelor in Science 1988: Graduated with a medical degree from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School 1991: Completed his residency at University of Washington School of Medicine 1991: Began his period as a medical attending at Mercy Hospital 1993: Studied his Masters degree in Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health 1994: Began his fellowship in cardiovascular diseases at the William Beaumont Hospital 1997: Joined the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute 2000: Appointed to serve as Section Chief of Cardiology of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Truman Medical Center 2002: Made a Consultant Cardiologist and Division Chief of Nutrition and Preventive Medicine at the William Beaumont Hospital 2010: Served as the Chief Academic and Scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System Current: Joined Baylor University Medical Center as Vice Chief of Internal Medicine and Chief of Cardiovascular Research of the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute

Any approach was good to reach the end goal, which was to vaccinate everybody to the brim. It's only when the criticisms started to appear that the "experts only" thing was pulled out of the hat. An amateur can inoculate the jab, but an amateur can't assess the jab's safety. No, that's the experts' job… And those experts who speak negatively of the jab are demoted from their expert status and become "discredited by the medical community", which is even worse than amateur status. So… only "experts" who speak positively of the jab may speak.

Most of the prostitutes on OnlyFans make a couple of hundred per month at most. It's like YouTube, an extreme minority make it big, the rest are empoverished wannabes with no skills or desire/ability to have a real job.

The Thais made him famous, he is one of the biggest YouTubers in the country, his content is exclusvely in Thai and tailored for Thai culture (I know because my young son watches him).

Sounds like BS identity politics. Thankfully, this absurd and nefarious ideology seems to be a thing of the past. CNN senior political commentator Van Jones speaks with a group of African Americans in South Carolina who explain why they voted for and continue to back President Donald Trump. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/01/politics/video/van-jones-south-carolina-black-voters-support-trump-digvid

"Not peer-revieeeeewed!!!", bleat the sheep.

Who could possibly deny this today?

Expect the sheep to bleat "But he's not a virologist!" in harmony (by the way, if only virologists are allowed to talk about this issue, then why were pharmacists giving vaccine advice to people?). Anyway, great example which a lot of people should follow.

No, they are not. Look at the data over the past decades. Which means the media is lying.

Megyn Kelly Still Battling VAIDS Caused by Covid Shot: ‘I Really, Really Regret Having Gotten the Vaccine’ “[W]e were lied to,” Kelly said, acknowledging others have had “worse” outcomes. “It was not an informed assumption of the risk,” she added. “There’s no question people have been hurt and even killed…I, for one, have learned a ton, but remain pissed off about how the whole thing was handled.” Last year, Kelly revealed that she had been “targeted” by the pharmaceutical industry after she went public about the side effects she suffered after receiving the Covid mRNA injection from Moderna. Kelly first revealed in September 2023 that she had been diagnosed with VAIDS. During an episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show,” the host asserted that her immune system was damaged by her Covid shot. https://slaynews.com/news/megyn-kelly-battling-vaids-covid-shot-really-regret-vaccine/

Doesn't change anything to the fact that he hits the nail square on the head.

Of course. And no need to project oneself to the 17th or 18th century. Pasteur's germ theory of disease (and that is what it is and called, a theory) is still refutable nowadays, and refuted it has been over time, by a plethora of respected and competent individuals such as Antoine Béchamp or Rudolf Virchow, who dismissed this notion that disease comes from outside the body rather than from within. Florence Nightingale also famously stated that in her experience, smallpox was not something that was “caught” from outside but grown from within.