rattlesnake

Incorrect. Try actually reading articles before commenting: Oct 18, 2024: Ontario’s measles outbreak officially began, per Public Health Ontario. Mar 6, 2025: Canadian government launched aggressive vaccine push; 227 measles cases reported since January. Mar 13, 2025: Ontario reported a dramatic rise of 195 new cases in just a week. Mar 14: Ontario’s top health official issued another vaccine push. Mar 20: CBC reported another 120 new cases in just 6 days following Moore’s statement. Mar 27: Additional 102 cases were reported in a single week. Mar 31: Ontario hit 557 total measles cases—the province’s largest outbreak in nearly 30 years. The case count more than doubled (227 → 557) in just 25 days following government vaccine campaigns. Incorrect. Here are the facts for those who are willing/able to actually look at them: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/measles-vaccine-and-gain-of-function

Dr. Nicolas Hulscher: the second-largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study EVER conducted (n=85 million people) found increased risks of: - Heart Attack (+286% after 2nd dose) - Stroke (+240% after 1st dose) - Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after 2nd dose) - Arrhythmia (+199% after 1st dose) video_2025-06-24_14-24-29.mp4

Dr. Nicolas Hulscher (an epidimiologist, but of course it doesn't count in this case as he doesn't say the right things – the denialists will now move on to say he is a "grifter taking advantage of gullible people"… God forbid they should even consider that there might be some truth in what he says): Grave implications of amyloidogenic fibrils found in a toddler exposed to Pfizer mRNA in the womb. What does this mean for an entire generation of babies subjected to genetic injections before birth? Born without vital signs just one week after the mother’s second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer), the child required emergency resuscitation. Now experiencing persistent health issues, the child’s blood sample revealed highly abnormal, autofluorescent fibrillar aggregates—confirmed via microscopy and Thioflavin T staining, a selective amyloid-binding dye. video_2025-06-24_14-18-34.mp4

As I see it, he is clinging on to his version of reality, as admitting he was even slightly misguided would mean admitting those he repeadedly insulted and looked down on were actually right – and as he has an ego the size of Russia, don't expect him to ever show the required humility for that. Ultimately, he will probably just drop out of these conversations for good, as 90% of the vax enthusiasts already have.

At least in the Don's case, it would make a modicum of sense.

Shout-out to Peace Nobel Prize winner Barack Obama and his 26,000 bombs on the Middle East. The Nobel Prize is an absolute joke.

It's demonstrated on this forum, by those who just paste in Grok results as if they were wielding the ultimate debating weapon, or will dismiss an argument because "AI has nothing to say about it". Real intelligence ends where artificial intelligence begins.

In Texas, Canada, and Hawaii, these outbreaks followed government-led vaccination campaigns, which raises the question of whether they were vaccine-induced, which is not a novel phenomenon, it happened before with polio, for example. Ontario case: Ontario Measles Outbreak More Than Doubles in Three Weeks After Federal and Local Gov't Vaccine Push Largest measles outbreak in 30 years. https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/ontario-measles-outbreak-more-than From the Vigilant Fox article: The live measles virus in the MMR vaccine is the product of gain-of-function (GOF) laboratory experiments, meaning it is deliberately engineered to enhance its ability to infect more human cells than the wild-type measles virus can and may retain characteristics that enable transmission and replication in the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. The live virus in the vaccine can be shed for weeks from the vaccinated, potentially infecting the unvaccinated. A 1995 CDC study found that 83% of vaccinated children had measles virus shed in their urine. An April 2012 publication in the peer-reviewed journal Paediatrics & Child Health reported a child was being investigated after developing a new-onset measles-type rash after receiving a measles vaccine, meaning the shot can cause disease in the vaccinated. Nucleic acid testing confirmed that a “vaccine-type measles virus was being shed in the [child’s] urine.” A 2014 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases confirms that vaccinated individuals can transmit measles to multiple contacts.

Your guidance is much appreciated. From the article: Increased Vaccinations Texas: From January 1 to March 16, 2025, Texas administered at least 173,000 doses of the measles vaccine, up from 158,000 during the same period in 2024—a roughly 9.5% increase. New Mexico: According to the New Mexico Department of Health, between February 1 and March 31, 2025, 14,757 doses of the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine were administered in New Mexico, compared to 8,162 during the same period in 2024—an 80.8% increase. Increased Cases Texas is the clear epicenter, with 709 cases reported as of early May, far surpassing any other state. New Mexico has reported 71 confirmed measles cases, as of early May 2025, confirmed by the New Mexico Department of Health. In any case, your semantic integrity is welcome, and would have been even more welcome when these messages were pushed unilaterally for a couple of months:

Please explain this: Top Two MMR-Vaccinated States Lead in 2025 Measles Cases https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/top-two-mmr-vaccinated-states-lead

Please explain this: Top Two MMR-Vaccinated States Lead in 2025 Measles Cases https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/top-two-mmr-vaccinated-states-lead

Ah, my apologies, the Owl and the Stiddle are sometimes mistaken for one another, as they share a couple of distinctive traits…

Thank you for your patience and willingness to stoop to these abyssal depths of mediocity and ignorance. I know several people who have unvaccinated children, i.e. they never received a single shot, and who are all in stellar health. How does that fit in with the statement "You're alive because of the vaccines you did get, not despite them. So yes, you’re a piggybacker and would be dead without past immunisation"?

Thank you for confirming we would die if you had it your way – you are not the only participant of this thread to have eugenic penchants towards the Dirty Parasitic Antivaxxers. However, there are two contradictory recurring statements on this forum regarding these weaker elements of society. So which one applies? Please choose one and be consistent. 1. We are "piggybackers" who are still alive because we benefit from the herd immunity the other responsible folk created, i.e. it is possible – albeit selfish and irresponsible – to be unvaccinated. 2. We would be dead if we had not been inoculated as children, i.e. it is not possible to be unvaccinated and failure to abide by this principle entails certain death. This is a fundamental contradiction which an enlightened, tertiary-educated mind can't tolerate, I am sure. Looking forward to the clarification.

Top bloke indeed and fit as a fiddle at an age where most people have a long list of ailments and associated medication. Whatever he's doing, he's doing right.

I found the recent episodes with Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Dr. Mary Talley Bowden to be very insightful indeed.

This is the most pro-foreigner government I have seen in my 15+ years here. Inundating the country with farangs.

I would be interested in seeing uptake statistics.

Would you mind expanding a little on that? Did you suffer adverse events, or do you have a reason to be wary? It is my understanding that these vaccines are safe and effective, and that smart, educated people follow the science and choose inoculation.

We are the weak elements of society. Lacessit thinks eugenics is the best approach to deal with us. What are your insights?

Just when I thought I couldn't be more in awe, you reveal your secret weapon and actually read my mind without me saying anything… I am checkmated (not that I have the skills to play chess, as you of course know, but I am merely trying to match your grandeur…).

Of course not, which is why frequenting people of your ilk is so insightful. Please continue posting your intelligent, educated insights for the greater good.

Buy you are here to explain them to me

I agree with your interpretation. Saying that vaccines are not properly studied after having previously stated they were is an admission of having lied, rather than failure. Nothing new from the pharmaceutical cartel, though. They did not fail in their endeavour, in fact they succeeded spectacularly. The good news is that proper studies are underway.

The paper is from NEJM, which a prominent pro-vaxxer of this forum has cited as a quality, reliable source in this very thread. If you guys actually put your money where your mouths are, you would read and assess it dispassionately, instead of coming up with increasingly convoluted (and quite frankly, amusing) reasons to preemptively dismiss it. As for media coverage (or lack thereof), you should definitely be asking yourself these critical questions. I'll let the Secretary of Health and Human Services explain it to you. Oh but wait, he's 'insane', isn't he? Can't watch that then, can we? Let's stick to typing "Are vaccines safe?" on Grok! "All the major institutions of our society have been captured by the (medical) industry. […] They advertise because they wanna control the content. If you look at Anderson Cooper or Lester Holt or Jake Tapper, their paycheck is being paid by the network but their salaries are actually coming from pharmaceutical companies, and they know that. And they know that they've got to toe the line and they've got the frighten us about infectious diseases. They've got to make us all comply with the pharmaceutical mandates, and they're not giving us real news. They're not asking the questions that they ought to be asking. There's no skepticism. And if you look at these new shows, like twenty years ago, they were saying, yeah, there are problems with vaccines or these other drugs. They will never do that today." kennedy big pharma controls media.mp4