rattlesnake

This is a possibility, yes.

Surely this has been reproduced on a small scale with a working model. I would be interested in seeeing that.

A "Final Experiment" not covered by the media. 18 months in Antarctica and no 24-hour Sun. 18 Months in Antartica - No 24 hour Sun.MP4

I was aware that they were making another video about this. The hype around it and media coverage was more a bad sign than anything else, to be honest. Anyway I have watched The Final Strawman Experiment, which, if it is actually not faked (some strange shadows and CGI glitches in there), indeed shows a constant Sun. This, as I said earlier here, is not incompatible with a level plane and does not resolve the incoherences of the heliocentric globe model such as absence of curvature or the impossibility of gravity holding water on a ball. The premise, which posits that showing a constant Sun in Antactica unequivocally proves the heliocentric model is real, is fallacious. Even if not fake, it debunks and/or proves nothing. Final Experiment - CGI.mp4

Still water doesn't curve.

It's a cruise itinerary. There are no tourist expeditions on the vast majority of the mainland.

No worries. The post-Reformation era is a very interesting period of history.

Correct.

For the third time in this thread: touristic routes are confined to outlying enclaves. The mainland is restricted by government-issued permits which are impossible to obtain.

Why We Are Not Allowed to Visit Antarctica https://brightside.me/articles/why-we-are-not-allowed-to-visit-antarctica-814786/#:~:text=The treaty states that Antarctica,delicate balance that exists there. If you're honestly interested in the topic, I can provide you with resources which explain how it is simply impossible to obtain the government-issued permit to visit. Nobody can go.

I'll check this out tomorrow.

You're looking at this the wrong way if you think there is an egotistic element in my posts. It's interesting because you're encouraging me to drop it and let you guys enjoy your echochamber. The fundamental issue, I believe, really is social pressure and group effect. You are incapable of addressing the incoherences of the heliocentric model and systematically default to the "it's not possible because too many people would have to be in on it" position. "Pseudoscience" is a BS term which, in essence, refers to anything which challenges the doxa.

Please spare me the pseudo-psychologism.

I say this respectfully, but you need to study this more in depth. Start with the Antarctic Treaty. We are not allowed to go.

The Final Experiment Sounds like a Netflix series. I will watch it tomorrow nonetheless and get back to you.

I know you're not ready to go there yet, Hummin, and as I said, I get it. Keep on asking questions, stay honest and open, breaking away from the deception is a slow process (it took several years in my case).

The process of believing one's eyes and common sense independently, breaking free from the doxa in spite of the massive social pressure and vilification, is the opposite of indoctrination. Dave Weiss is a pretty reliable source of information among others, IMO.

You and I can climb Everest anytime. We can't go to Antartica. That's my point.

Water always remains level. Water drops are round because of a phenomenon called "surface tension", which is caused by the cohesive forces between water molecules, making them naturally pull together to form a spherical shape that minimizes their surface area, essentially acting like a "skin" on the water drop.

"As for only certain areas being accessible this on the whole is true but because it's very dangerous." Letting people decide where you are allowed to go or not, what is true or not, without question.

The earth is very big and gravity is very weak and water is heavy and paper isn't. That doesn't mean anything. Midnight sun and Summer solstice already explained in this thread. Antartica (bar small enclave granted to the plebs) inaccessible due to Antarctic Treaty. If you wish to refute, kindly articulate rationally and refrain from posting laughing or confused emojis.

Please explain how a force can be strong enough to stick trillions of gallons of water to a ball, but not enough to flatten a napkin on the surface of said ball.

Think.

Please explain why this entire napkin, when dropped on the ground, isn't pulled towards the Earth's core.