rattlesnake

What did they think of the spin? 1,000 km/h, that must be quite a sight.

Interesting.

A treaty signed by all countries of the world prevents ordinary citizens from going there. Whistleblowers such as Erick Hecker, ex contractor for Raytheon, has testified that there are exotic weapons and technology there that are beyond anything humans could ever produce or conceive. Any thoughts? Insights? https://rumble.com/v3aapwb-advanced-weaponry-in-antartica-base.html

It's called respect.

Could be vaccine-induced flare-ups. I know someone who developed persistent eczema just after taking booster shots to come to Thailand back in 2010.

Humans are susceptible to dogma and everything it entails, i.e. overaching principles and mantras edicted by trusted sources of truth, as well as vilification of dissenting opinions. The switch from religion to science (and heliocentrism is possibly the key event in this process) was a switch from one dogma to another. It comes as no surprise that the vast majority of those who defend heliocentrism, in the two currently active threads on the topic, also have an open aversion to religion, to the point where the mere mention of the Bible will cause an immediate shutdown.

The core issue is the refutation of the heliocentric model, which is as absurd as it is impossible. Accepting heliocentrism as unequivocal truth merely because some phenomenons have not been officially explained under another model is fallacious.

And we're not allowed to go to Antartica (but that is potentially for another thread, though the topics are related).

Or everything about nothing?

I knew there was a chance someone who actually knows what they are talking about might turn up You are absolutely correct about the historical and political context surrounding the switch to heliocentrism. It was politically and ideologically motivated, and "science" was subverted in order to achieve that goal. That's all. The pursuit of truth had nothing to do with it I will likely get 10 laughing emojis for this post, and that is absolutely expected and normal. Heliocentrism is a belief. A very deeply rooted one, too. In fact it is one of the first things a human learns after birth. Once a world view has been modelled on a belief, it becomes extremely difficult, I would say virtually impossible even, to break free from it and accept a challenge to it, regardless of how many absurdities and contradictions are presented (shoutout to @Tippaporn for helping me understand how fundamental this issue is). There are several sources one can consult to learn about The Reformation, the Jesuits, Copernicus, paganism, sun-worshipping and the political endeavour to impose heliocentrism, however I will recommend the documentary Heliosorcery, which lays it all out clearly and factually.

Indeed, my dear rumak, and I always appreciate your humility (a few people here would be well-advised to follow that example) and also your openness to alternative views, even if not necessarily convinced by them, always with a sharp wit and humour.

There is only so much time I can devote to interacting with you brilliant minds, Will.

I assume you are asking me to explain what I see. I see several representations of a spherical Earth, some of them with the contraptions colloquially referred to as "satellites" in the foreground.

You claim the curve is visible at 35,000 feet. I have shown you footage of a level plane at 121,000 feet. Please explain.

"Science says…" I think this is the core issue, coming to terms with the fact that "science", and everything it entails, is just one big hoax. I have presented you with a contradiction in your premise by showing you footage at 121,000 feet where the Earth appears flat. The last guy I had this conversation with, on another forum, had the honesty of actually trying to explain the heliocentric model (rather than just laughing and/or dropping insults and leaving the discussion as most people do). After some time on Google, he finally admitted to me that it was "too vast for the human mind to comprehend" and that was why we have the "NASA experts". Delegating our elementary common sense to authorities who decide for us what is or isn't true, such is, I believe, the greatest issue of the modern age.

I think there is no ISS and it is all fake. And it's not very professional work, most of the time. Example glitch: 2FF994D0-D5B8-4482-8180-6498B2431E5C.MP4

I understand. 121,000 feet is 36 km. From what altitude do you posit the Earth would cease to appear flat and become spherical?

Exactly, the curve we see on the second video is caused by a fisheye lens. With a normal lens or to the naked eye, it would appear flat.

So your logic is that it is normal for Earth to appear flat at 121,000 feet. Here is footage of someone jumping from 42,000 feet. The Earth appears curved. How do you explain that?

Use common sense, be objective and rational. This was taken from a balloon at 121,000 feet. How do you reconcile what you see with the heliocentric model, which posits that we are on a ball spinning on its axis at 1,000 mph as it revolves around the sun at 66,600 mph, while the Sun itself (and therefore we) are shooting through space at 450,000 mph?

Was.

Definitely.

Phew!

Never heard of that and a quick search didn't turn up any relevant results. As they say on Asean Now, "can you post a link to back up your claim?"

Pretty compelling indeed… though there is no shortage of coincidence theorists here who will question your mental health for suggesting the vaccine could have anything to do with it.