rattlesnake

Stanley Milgram established a long time ago that people will obey authority without question, even if it is wrong. The means deployed for this operation were unprecedented and rationality went out the window. Now the dust has settled, I am repeatedly observing that those who turned against me for refusing the jab are now avoiding the subject altogether. Pride and various degrees of denial prevent them from admitting that I was right.

It takes many years to establish that the medical establishment lied and endangered people for profit. A couple more examples below (there are dozens). Maybe that will help you put things into perspective and understand that getting the green light by the authorities (especially when hundreds of billions are at stake) is not proof of safety or reliability. Pfizer Reaches $894M Painkiller Settlement The world's biggest drugmaker said Friday it has agreements in principle to end more than 90 percent of personal injury lawsuits brought by people claiming the pills caused heart attacks, strokes or other harm. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pfizer-reaches-894m-painkiller-settlement/ Merck agrees to pay $4.85 billion in Vioxx settlement Merck & Co has agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle most of the claims that its painkiller Vioxx caused heart attacks and strokes in thousands of users, the drug maker said on Friday. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL09297266/

"Pfizer doesn't grant approval of its own vaccines. National governments do." Exactly my point. National governments approve pharmaceutical products, so if billions end up being paid in settlements in compensation for all sorts of wrongdoings including false claims, what does a rational mind infer?

And they would never lie, would they? After all, their track record is impeccable. This example (one of many others) from 2009 comes to mind: Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

An "uncomfortable" question indeed, as is the one regarding the vaccination status of people hospitalised and dying. They have not been reported since early 2023, and quite understandably so: imagine if we were to discover that it is the multi-jabbed who are clogging and burdening the healthcare system. Not very good, narrative-wise!

Another thing is that most people find it very hard to admit they were wrong.

I'm seeing lots of sick people too. All fully "vaccinated" and feeling very confused.

Yes of course. FYI, for your next "anecdote": Fox was pro-jab.

Ditto.

I've seen several Thais do this in France. They all, without exception, end up alone with a drinking problem which they fuel by being prostitutes, sometimes in addition to working in Asian restaurants.

He was talking about chlorine dioxide and he was right. Inhibition of the Binding of Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Spike Protein to a Human Receptor by Chlorine Dioxide https://www.remedypublications.com/open-access/inhibition-of-the-binding-of-variants-of-sars-cov-2-coronavirus-spike-7364.pdf "These findings show that chlorine dioxide aqueous solution can inactivate the binding of the variant spike proteins to the human ACE2 receptor protein, indicating that this strategy may be useful in blocking the transmission of variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses." Protective effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against influenza A virus infection https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18089729/ Evaluation of the antiviral activity of chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite against feline calicivirus, human influenza virus, measles virus, canine distemper virus, human herpesvirus, human adenovirus, canine adenovirus and canine parvovirus https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20616431/

I thought correlation didn't cause causation? Or does that depend on whether it suits you or not?

It means "parcel", พัสดุ

You are correct, thanks for clarifying that.

Trump did not go to Epstein Island, nor did he fly on the Lolita Express.

It will 99.9% be shot down by the Supreme Court.

It's suite amusing to see you bend over backwards to justify the unjustifiable. In the KKK, Byrd was named the “exalted cyclops,” which meant he held the top office there.

Biden is a racist and has a long history of racist remarks. There is nothing you can do or say to mitigate this fact. The Bidens have been sounding like racists for years — but too many on the left and in the media cover for them. It’s time for the rest of us to call them out. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jul/15/bidens-racist-history/

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2019/06/20/biden-plays-cleanup-while-his-team-gripes-to-the-press-448750 Or take this little-noticed comment from a 1973 speech Biden made at the City Club in Cleveland: “I think the two-party system, although my Democratic colleagues won’t like me saying this, I think the two-party system is good for the South, and good for the Negro and good for the black in the South. … Other than the fact they still call me ‘boy,’ I think they’ve changed their mind a little bit.”

What's your take on this? Biden’s History of Getting Away With Racist Remarks https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/bidens-history-getting-away-racist-remarks In 2007, he referred to Barack Obama as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean.” In 2010, he warmly eulogized Sen. Robert Byrd, a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan, saying he was “one of my mentors” and that “the Senate is a lesser place for his going.” Biden said two-party system in South was 'good for the Negro' https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-said-two-party-system-in-south-was-good-for-the-negro

You are confusing concepts here. Trump's America First politics are fundamentally protectionist. Don't take my word for it, just read what some prominent Trump haters say about it. Joseph Stiglitz, in his book Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Age of Trump, goes to great lengths to smear the mere concept of protectionism as embodied by Trump. Top economists blame Trump's protectionist policies for global 'stagnation' https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/top-economists-blame-trump-s-protectionist-policies-global-stagnation-n1070036 Economists offer bleak view of President Trump’s first term, citing deglobalization trends and ‘protectionism’ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/24/krugman-stiglitz-sachs-and-economists-comment-on-trumps-first-term.html

Please list a few of those pronouncements.

Danderman can’t quote me saying Hitler was right because I didn’t say it. Now I asked you whether you had read Mein Kampf or not, because that is necessary to understand the context. Hitler’s political vision was steeped in race, his obsession was to safeguard the Aryan race and when he says “all great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died out from blood poisoning”, it is pretty self-explanatory. Trump’s political vision, however, is fundamentally protectionist and therefore, logically (as was the case with the original left such as embodied by Jean Jaurès) is against mass immigration. When he says immigrants are poisoning “the blood of our country”, he is referring to the economic and social fabric of the country. In line with his protectionist vision, he also said that he was going to “stop the invasion of our southern border and begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history." There isn’t – and never was – a racial component to Trump’s political view. Only an ignorant or a mediocre sophist would say this. Oh and while we’re on the subject, what’s your take on this? "It's not confined to a party," Biden said regarding attitudes about race. "And I think the two-party system, although my Democratic colleagues don't like me saying this, I think the two-party system is good for the South, good for the Negro, good for the black in the South, and other than the fact that they still call me boy, I don't think they've changed their mind on this." https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-said-two-party-system-in-south-was-good-for-the-negro

Yes. Now please quote the part where you claim I say Hitler was right.

Please quote the part where you claim I say Hitler was right.