youreavinalaff

You are confused. Illegal immigrants, on the whole, don't work. Penalties for employing Illegal immigrants are high.

That would be your opinion. Personally, I wouldn't place the whole female population in one group. Women in general look better with their natural look. Any chemical or surgical cosmetic interference just spoils their looks.

In film roles of course there are those that are best suited. A white woman for Snow White, a male as James Bond, a male as Batman, a female as Wonder Woman, a female as Cat woman. There are occasions when the title tole name and the history and culture of such leads to a specific profile. It's not racist to cast a white woman as Snow White. It's not sexist to cast as male as Batman. It's not sexist to cast a woman as Wonder Woman.

I agree. The reason for my comment is that it's often said "over a million immigrants here on benefits". That's wrong. Very wrong. The million legal immigrants can't claim benefits.

People need to understand the fundamental difference between legal immigrants, many working and paying tax and without whom healthcare and social care would be seriously understaffed (just one example of and industry dependent on immigration), and illegal immigrants who cost money.

Liars? No. Just the misinformed. There were no male competitors in the female boxing in the Olympics. The ignorant and misinformed may think so but science prevails, as always.

It goes without saying.

No.

You've now mentioned it twice. It's still wrong.

By definition, they are not. That's wrong, I agree, but they are not illegal if they are deemed to have grounds for asylum. Regardless of their travels. Unfortunately, the British government are tied by international law. The Rwanda scheme seemed to stem arrivals. Sadly, the new government scrapped the scheme before putting a new one in place.

It's asylum seekers in hotels. Not illegal immigrants, regardless of religion. There are less than men serving in the military.

You said "18yr is of legal age to obtain a licence to ride a scooter." That's incorrect. I corrected you.

15 years old for motorcycles upto 110cc

Do share. Without sharing, evidence isn't worth a to$$.

Facts should be backed by evidence. Do you have any?