youreavinalaff

Nope. As I've said. I edited one comment long before anyone quoted it gor typo reasons. Your assumptions are just that. As you might see from my other posts, I'm far removed from having views you assume I have. As I've explained.

No. The last post I edited was 49 minutes ago. That was because of a typo. You quoted my post, an unedited post, 36 minutes ago. I've never suggested you can't read.

That would be one solution. The other eould be unisex toilets. I went to the theatre recently. There was one door to the toilets. That led to two long rows of cubicles. Each for use by either gender.

Sure. Double standards and assumptions.

If your fundamental lack of understanding of English grammar suggests that to you, so be it. I have never, and never will, refer to transgenders as "perverts". You are quite welcome to check my posting history on such matters. If you read carefully and slowly, I'm sure you'll get the picture.

Not lying. Look at the comments trail. I was using the posters own words against his apparent acceptance. He's contradicted himself. That's the point. Had you quoted my whole comment, it would have been obvious.

I believe you've quoted the wrong poster. I have never suggested transgender are perverts. I was quoting another who did. You should be asking them the question.

If you would be OK with that, why suggest they are perverts? It's difficult to understand your acceptance of having perverts in the toilet with you.

It's intended to be a devolved benefit.

Neither.

Do your daughters not, or have never, attended school in Thailand?

You make a good point. Men like you, who consider transgender people as "perverts", would rather they did use the female toilets, wouldn't they? Would the same men who think transenders are "perverts", prefer a woman who has transitioned to a man use which toilets?

Are you suggesting a woman who, for medical reasons, cannot bear children is not a woman?

I think you need to read the OP again. You appear to have misunderstood.

We had that issue with my wife's son, my stepson. I had to move away to Bangkok suburbs for work. Wife wanted her son to come with us. I promised to put him through school there and give him opportunities. I promised we'd be back to Isaan in 5 years where I would continue to put him through school. The child's paternal grandparents disagreed. The father was not particularly interested what happened. The boy stayed with grandparents. He is now delinquent and often in trouble with the local constabulary. My wife has washed her hands of him as he only contacted when in need of money. It's a shame. Our daughter, only 3 years younger had the stable upbringing with us. Was taught to work hard to achieve. She is now in UK studying and working to be a nurse. What could have been for the boy? We'll never know but certainly he'd be in a better situation than he is now.