Jump to content

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by youreavinalaff

  1. It was a vote for an independent Scotland. The result was NO. Just as well. SNP can't even handle their own finances. They'd never be able to handle the whole country's.
  2. I believe it was a vote for Scottish people. The result was NO. That's it.
  3. How many votes on independence have there been? Any since 2014?
  4. No need. Chomper has already mentioned, on numerous occasions, that no one has been sent to Rwanda. However, it's also been posted on here, many times, that illegal immigrants have been returned to their home countries. Your comment agreed with that, up to present time.
  5. So, you can't show proof. Thanks for agreeing with my point.
  6. To be honest, I would not have known where his shirt came from had the press not jumped on this. Another example to the media making something out of nothing. To the general audience is looks like a t shirt. An ordinary, everyday item of clothing. I wonder where the swivel chairs they use come from?
  7. All worked for a living, then. Good on them. Don't mention Saville. Shh. Shh. https://moneyweek.com/economy/uk-economy/605472/is-rishi-richer-than-the-king-how-much-is-rishi-sunak-worth#:~:text=So%2C while Rishi Sunak and,with that kind of wealth.
  8. I agree with you. Facts are facts. The point is, much of what you wrote is not fact.
  9. Exactly my point. The plan is not in full swing. Planes have been blocked from taking off. You can't prove that the plan has had zero impact as it's not completed yet, due to opposition from various sources. That's for agreeing.
  10. No, but plans have been blocked. There's been opposition in the Lords. There is no proof, you haven't provided any, that the plan has had no impact or that it would have no impact if allowed to proceed. If you can prove otherwise, please do.
  11. No. Voted on measures that are, due to opposition, as yet untested. If you can prove they would have zero impact, if allowed to proceed, please do.
  12. 1.2 million illegal immigrant population? Low skilled or unskilled legal immigrants? Your links don't prove a great deal of your comment. Missing illegal immigrants cost the government nothing. They are illegal. Hence they are hiding. No benefits, can't use NHS, not living in hotels ....... Citing Wikipedia is laughable.
  13. If you see my post, I wrote it in the present tense. So, no, nothing has changed. Unless you can show how many undocumented illegal immigrants have been sent to Rwanda or other safe countries
  14. I was speaking about present and past procedures. Not future and possibly not going to happen procedures.
  15. Strangely, the election winners will likely be the party who have voted against the measures to reduce illegal immigration.
  16. I have no idea where your figures come from but they are so incorrect. As an example, 1.2 million is the figure for visas issued. They are legal immigrants.
  17. No, I'm not confused. Those claiming asylum have documents. Those without documents will be deported, when their country of origin has been determined.
  18. No, it isn't. It's called using correct terminology.
  19. No. That is asylum seekers. Illegal immigrants are deported to their own countries.
  20. Incorrect on so many points. Time to go and educate yourself. Stop reading propaganda. Then you and your people will stop calling groups by the wrong name.
  21. Yes, you are correct. That's about it.
  22. That figure is for FNO- Foreign national offenders. The number of illegal immigrants deported was over 20000.
  23. Those that claim asylum are asylum seekers. Not illegal immigrants. The clue is in the name.
  24. Tell that to the opposition, numerous charities and human rights groups.
×
×
  • Create New...