youreavinalaff

That explains everything. The kids are smarter than the you. That's why you are on hear getting advice.

If you read the whole quote, you'll see why part of it was left out by those trying to make something out if a 5 year old conversation.

This whole thread is based on a truncated quote. Truncated, no doubt, for effect.

The issue started at home. The girls should never have been on the motorbike. How many times they've been seen by police, I don't know. Teaching fear of lack of safety would work better. Have TV adverts with graphic images. Have leaflets handed out at garages, motor cycle shops and hospitals showing graphic images of what can happen if safety measures are not followed. Show prople road safety us not only a matter of law for the police to enforce.

You cannot police everyone all of the time.

Did anyone say any differently?

A sad life. Getting satisfaction by watching others in difficulty. Especially when involving family. I guess you have your own issues and gloating at others makes you feel better.

Riveting? For someone who doesn't give a flying fig? Make up your mind. Personally, if a Mum wants to edit a photo of her and her kids, why not? If some people looking at the photo don't like it or think there is some hidden agenda, tough s%$t.

It's a good job the East German, female Olympians of the 70s and 80s weren't. Not a clean shave amongst them. 😁😁

You were off the subject when you quoted my comment. Try to keep up with the thread. That way, you'll not end up looking foolish.

You like to go on about me having been an English teacher so, let me explain. Your question asks about "the competition". That was whilst quoting my mention of the Olympics. That in turn was in reply to you questioning if there have ever been any rules regarding gender of competitors. So, we were on the subject of the Olympics, off topic or not, and you were joining in. Now, you say I'm wrong whilst quoting text regarding the golf tournament. To be clear, although you often use ambiguity in your posts as a wriggle, you need to go back and add "golf" to your question, therefore getting tge question to match your wriggling answer.

I think you'll find I was replying to you off topic post on another subject. Once again................here we go.

Yes, it is. No confirmation of being a female, no admittance to the competition.

No. There are rules for same sex sports. It wasn't that long ago, late 70s early 80s, female Olympians needed a "sex certificate" in order to compete. That's all is needed now. Carry a sex certificate for gender at birth. That's the competition you join. Simple.

I agree totally with your last two paragraphs. Allow everyone to participate. I don't recall excluding anyone.

"Do you were doing your teacher thing"??? If I've understood your comment with incorrect English. Yes. You wrote 2 paragraphs. My answer to your issues is what I wrote. No need for new categories. Men against men, women against women. If transgender athletes want it differently, they should set up their own competitions. Just like Aron D'Souza has with his Enhanced games.

I was answering your two paragraphs. Not linking them.

No new categories needed. Keep politics out of sport.

Nonsense answer. As the article explains, a taser did the trick.

I doubt there has been a rise in occurances. It's likely the bar has been lowered considerably with regards to what was considered banter and is now considered harassment. I'm not condoning any negative behaviour towards anyone. I'm against discrimination of any kind. It's just, in modern times it's become common place to report what was once considered a mon event. I remember the days women would give as good as they got. Often beating the guys with sarcastic come backs and equally sexist replies. Stopping the guys in their tracks. These days one can't even tell some women how lovely they look without the risk of bring accused of harassment.

In America, sure. Not everyone wants to be like the US of A.

If your extension is based on money in the bank, that is.

Certificates of residence should be free too. The only legitimate charges at immigration are on the board. The comment was valid. Showing corruption sometimes has to be accepted.

I think you need to look at the whole thread before you misquote me.

Why do I need to show proof of something you suggest?