youreavinalaff

My daughter was born in 2002. Absolutely no issues at all when applying for her UK passport.

You will need to be in UK. Your wife will need to go through the usual visa stages. Settlement, FLR then ILR. 5 years in total. You both won't need to stay in UK for the entirety of the 5 years but there are limits.

Yes.

Do a border run the day before expiry and get 90 days. When the 90 days expires, get a further 60 days at immigration. Total 17 months.

No, you don't.

He also asked if a visit to Trendy is required. Suggesting an agent answers that question. Back under the bridge for you.

With one or two exceptions, it would appear.

There are no efforts required. It's the law. There are thousands with non dom status in UK. People seem to think she should be treated differently just because of her husband's job.

To shut up the whingers. Mirror mirror.

She didn't have to be shamed into paying tax in UK as she doesn't have to pay tax in UK.

Winter is the government's fault now. When will it ever end. 🤣🤣

That's not an accurate comment and you know it.

Probably as you have 2 correct answers. When trying to belittle, it's always best not to make mistakes.

No, he hasn't been teaching illegally. Please read, digest and try to understand prior to making inane comments.

Exactly. All of which prove not all voters think the same or vote for the same reasons. As I've already stated.

Where would forums be without the usual inane questions from those defending incorrect comments?

Incorrect. Some/many/a %%%% of voters............ Not "voters". That suggests all that vote.

Thanks for the compliment. However, it was a simple observation. Nothing more. As usual, some posters' haste in replying results in the ommittance of simple words that would make their comments more accurate.

Your mistake is not fully reading my comment to another poster. I was not disputing reasons for voting, possibly by some/many/a majority of voters. Rather, his use of "voters" as an entirety. Your reply was, therefore, inane. For that, you are forgiven.

Take a look at what you like.

I don't see how a sentence composed around "we", without clarifying the individuals covered or those excluded from such a group, can be understood to be taken as that of spokesman.

"Voters pay much more attention to issues concerning the economy and health care." Really? Who appointed you spokesman for the British electorate?

"Tax avoiding wife"?

It's been quite clear for sometime there will be a change of the guard in parliament. Labour will likely win a majority. That will let them attempt to put their policies into action. The big hurdle is money. There isn't any.

It seems your conspiracies answer your questions. It likely goes on but it's not the norm anymore.