GroveHillWanderer

But if you meant, "who guarantees the due process rights of the murder victims of illegal aliens," then again, you haven't understood what"due process" means. Due process applies when a person is subject to certain proceedings by the government, such as prosecution for a crime. It doesn't apply to someone who is dead, they tend not to get prosecuted, as a general rule.

Sorry, that doesn't even make any sense. What does, "murder victims of the illegal aliens due," mean?

I wouldn't set too much store by Thailand Medical News site articles. They specialise in doom-laden, click-bait headlines - as a quick glance at their site will show.

You're the one who's confused. As the extract from the Supreme Court ruling I quoted earlier states, even illegal aliens must be afforded due process. In case that wasn't clear enough for you, the following law journal article also states it, quite unequivocally. https://www.lawshelf.com/blogentryview/the-due-process-rights-of-illegal-entrants-to-the-united-states (Emphasis mine).

You don't appear to understand what "due process" means. Due process doesn't mean being immune from prosecution, it means that a person's legal rights are respected and that the government must follow a prescribed process when taking actions that could affect their rights, such as (for instance) when prosecuting them for a crime.

Yes, the same legal process. As the Supreme Court said, in one of their recent rulings on the Abrego Garcia case: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a931_2c83.pdf

US pulls out of formal peace talks between Ukraine and Russia https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/us-withdraws-ukraine-russia-peace-talks-b1225632.html

Well, he's not negotiating any more. US pulls out of formal peace talks between Ukraine and Russia https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/us-withdraws-ukraine-russia-peace-talks-b1225632.html

This ruling doesn't say the President cannot conduct foreign policy. It says that the President does not get to interpret Congressional statutes and decide what they mean - that's the job of the courts. The judge was very clear about this in his ruling. https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-blocks-alien-enemies-act-deport-venezuelans-texas/story?id=121364022

Who is that directed at - the judge? I doubt if he reads this forum.

I'm not sure I'd refer to this as a win for Trump. I'd say it's more of a win for Ukraine. What the deal actually does, is create a: Where the minerals/resources come into it is as follows: So the short term effects of this fund being established, will all go to investment within Ukraine, so pretty much exclusively to Ukraine's benefit. And while there should be some gains for the US eventually, that's unlikely to be for at least a decade, given the following provision. Svyrydenko and Bessent signed an agreement to create a US–Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund https://odessa-journal.com/svyrydenko-and-bessent-signed-an-agreement-to-create-a-usukraine-reconstruction-investment-fund

I've listened to the entirety of her remarks and her words don't sound any better when taken in the round.

He's negotiated a deal with Ukraine here, however it has nothing to do with ending the war, except perhaps in the most indirect sense. This is a deal to invest in a fund for the future rebuilding and development of Ukraine but does nothing, in and of itself, to end the war. For instance, it doesn't involve Russia in any way and I don't know about you but I reckon any deal to end the war would have to involve them.

But again, the claim that 258 million people's lives were saved, doesn't even make any sense. Yes, the amount of fentanyl seized could theoretically kill that many people. However, for it to be true in reality, you would have to assume that firstly, 258 million people were actually going to take fentanyl and secondly that every single time it was taken, it would have been fatal to whoever takes it. Which is clearly not the case. Incidentally, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection's figures, they seized 64,000 pounds of fentanyl during former President Joe Biden’s administration. Using Bondi’s logic, it could be said that Biden saved 14 billion lives (which is double the world’s population). https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/may/01/pam-bondi/Bondi-Trump-fentanyl-seizures-overdose/

No, he hasn't. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2025/03/04/donald-trumps-team-takes-first-steps-to-cut-legal-immigration/ Donald Trump’s Team Takes First Steps To Cut Legal Immigration

Do these people not realise how ridiculous they sound when they make absurd, sycophantic claims like this? https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/donald-trump-pam-bondi-fentanyl-b2743103.html

Your interpretation flies in the face of the evidence, though. Reduced to its simplest form, it was put to Trump that he could bring Abrego Garcia back, to which he replied, "I could." It doesn't get much clearer than that

No clearer indication could be found of Trump's compulsive lying. They're aren't 200 countries in the world. Unless of course, Trump has done two deals already with some of them. 😁

See, even you can see that the letters MS13 were added in to the photo. However that's not what Trump believes. The transcript could hardly be clearer: "Trump: "No, no, Terry, no, no....no, no....He had M-S as clear as you can be, not interpreted." (Emphasis mine)

See my post immediately above yours. No law enforcement agency or manual lists these as MS13 symbols.

You don't even understand the terminology do you? "Afrikaner" refers to the descendants of the original Dutch colonists in South Africa. There are no black Afrikaners, the term is used exclusively for white people.

Of course there's something to contest it - multiple experts on gang affiliations and tattoos have pointed out that these are not known to be symbols associated with MS13. Even US law enforcement does not list these symbols as being MS13-related. As stated in the article below: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-posts-image-kilmar-abrego-175852020.html

No, he didn't say the tattoos were photoshopped, he said the characters "M S 1 3" shown above the tattoos in the photo Trump had shown, were photoshopped and that the meaning of the actual tattoos, the mariajuana leaf, smiley face, cross and skull were open to interpretation.

Here's the actual photo, being held up by Trump. As the article linked to below points out: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-posts-image-kilmar-abrego-175852020.html

But only if they're the right sort of people, of course. South Africa reels over Trump's offer of refugee status to white Afrikaners https://www.npr.org/2025/04/08/nx-s1-5352893/south-africa-reels-over-trumps-offer-of-refugee-status-to-white-afrikaners