jak2002003

What sad, misguided and lonely lives some of these people must be leading. 

Maybe she should have shown more diligence and not been walking through a place where people were flying planes, not looking where she was going or what was going on around her while playing games on her phone.

Leave them alone. 

They don't deserve to be locked up in these disgusting farms. 

They are native to Thailand and part of nature.  

They are less dangerous to people than traffic or street dogs.  

At least if they catch the in residential areas they could release them into the national parks 

11 minutes ago, The Fugitive said:

I was used to having cereal for breakfast in UK. Since being an adult haven't put milk in tea or coffee. Don't buy cereal in Thailand hence no need for milk. None of Thai family consume it either. 

Same with us. We never buy milk..not done for years. 

I fact we are virtually zero dairy.  The good cheese is imported and so overpriced so I won't buy it.   The normal processed cheese is disgusting...may as well eat melted plastic. 

I think the only time I eat cheese is if I eat.a pizza at an Italian restaurant...which is no more that twice a year. 

4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Welfare, free health care, state pensions are all left wing.

Unless they remove these, the government is left wing.

They are doing their best to remove them.. ????

14 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

I am wondering why international organizations are to blame?? They have nothing to do with the political situation in Thailand. The problems occur from inside, and anarchy is a very big word. But as normal, everybody thinks they have the gift and talk a lot of rubbish that is believed by the people

Because it's always the foreigners fault....Thai people would never dream of doing anything bad.

Hope your dog will be OK. 

I the meantime try feeding him several small meals a day rather than on or two normal sized portions. 

2 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

Sounds like you need some history lessons.

Go on them.... Tell us...

Send the immigration bus around tomorrow to load up the lot and send them off to Rwanda. 

They are not even British. They are German immigrants who sneakily changed their family name to hide the fact after the war. 

Entitled usuelsss idiots most of them....

12 hours ago, CartagenaWarlock said:

1. A 60-year man can get a model looking 19-year young girl for 2K-3K in local currency.
2. Can impregnate a model looking 19-year young girl easily by a 60-year old man.
3. A 60-year old man can easily feel the silk smooth skin of a model looking young girl in her birthday suit all night for a few hundred dollars. 
4. Walk into most bars and pick up a girl to do everything one can do in a brothel or for an additional 200 baht in a nearby room. 
5. Can watch old ugly men wandering from brothels (aka bars) to brothels (aka brothels) in songthaew and passing sexual innuendo to local girls that they won't dare to do in a London bus. 
    

At least you are honest, but this list makes you sound like a creepy perverted old sexual predator. 

1.  Thai food...particularly the Northern food. 

2.  Easy to casually socialise with friendly Thai people who don't want to get into heated debates or arguments in every conversation. 

3.  Lack of petty nosey complaining winging neighbours. 

4.  A lot more freedom in day to day life activities. 

5.  Smiling, good looking people (more than my home country). 

42 minutes ago, Surasak said:

Five years!! How generous! If the labour louts get their feet under table next year, I feel sure they will be begging the IMF for bale out like they did in the 70's, within 3years. A lot of things have changed since then, but labour are still very good at spending other peoples money and totally perplexed when it runs out.

Nice of the current government to give King Charles a pay increase from 86 million to 125 million, while constancy cutting poor and disabled people's benifits as poverty increase and people are forced to use food banks to survive. 

As usual taking money off the poor to give to the rich.  You can not think this current government is good for the UK. 

1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

No, it's not. They lost it to the invading British and other assorted Europeans.  

Yes. It was stolen illegally off them. 

It's fair enough to say sorry and give them it back.  I'm sure they EU let the other nationalities stay there. 

Hand the country back over to them totally. 

It's their county. 

3 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

I'm against killing these dogs with rifles, and instead prefer the only way to curb the population, which is spay-neuter, and hopping it up to where it's done countrywide and not just certain areas. Your response is ridiculous because you don't understand what a legitimate gunman could do. They would be in vehicles, after gathering a certain amount of dogs in an area with food. Using suppressed rifles, they could shoot many in one sitting. A "gunman", like many hunters like myself, is capable of head and torso shots, which are instantly fatal. Dogs hear fireworks almost every day with all the funerals going on, so even a gunshot that wasn't suppressed wouldn't scare them away from inside a vehicle. This was done with deer a few times in Princeton, New Jersey, where people stopped legal hunting and the deer population of course exploded, causing hundreds of traffic accidents and some deaths, besides the destruction the deer did with flora in that area. The man killed a few hundred deer, by himself, with a suppressed rifle, with multiple kills before the deer realized what was happening. If a dog doesn't see the shooter, they aren't smart enough to understand what's happening to others going down while they're eating. Again, I'm against this sort of thing, and would like to see the numbers controlled in a humane way, keeping the population from going out of hand like it is now.

Thank you for your reply. 

I was sure a trained hunter would be more than capable of shooting to kill a large fat sick feral dog with a single shot. 

And an instant death by a bullet to the head is causing far far less suffering to a street dog than the other do gooders 'kind' option involving..... 

1. Chasing the frightened dog about and putting it through the stress of capture. 

2. Keeping it in a cage at the medical place while holding it down and jabbing needles into it. 

3. Cutting it open and cutting out its reproductive organs before stitching it back up and leaving it with a painful wound. 

4. Keeping it caged up on a strange place while it recovers, surrounded by loud barking dogs and scary people. 

5. Stress of handling and transport before being throw out onto the streets to fend for itself and avoid getting run down by a truck or poisoned / abused by cruel people. 

17 minutes ago, transam said:

We have someone who knows nothing about guns and bullet travel....????

What? 

Can't professional gun trained people / hunters shoot to kill a feral dog? 

2 hours ago, proton said:

Indeed, a bullet would be the better option all round

You are right. 

It's so easy to solve this problem within a few months and never have it happen again. 

Hire professional people who are trained to use guns to go out and kill all the dogs one area at a time. 

Then make it lawn all owned dogs should be mixrochipped and registered and make it illegal to let dogs roam the streets and illegal for people to abandon and dump unwanted dogs. 

End of story. 

Time to make people wear special cloggs when using these things.