Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Anutin orders faster deportations of foreign offenders

Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul has instructed governors across Thailand to act quickly against foreign nationals who break the law, exploit Thais or engage in what he described as undesirable behaviour.

Speaking at the Interior Ministry at about 8.30am on 17 September, Anutin said foreigners who earn an honest living, respect Thai law and do not take advantage of local people remain welcome. He specifically mentioned Phuket and Surat Thani, but said similar action was needed nationwide.

Deportation action without delays

For foreigners living in, investing in or visiting Thailand, the immediate message is not a change to legal immigration status or visa rules, but a tougher enforcement approach where authorities believe there is evidence of wrongdoing.

Anutin told governors and district chiefs to stop handling cases one at a time and use their full legal powers. He said he had signed an Interior Ministry deportation announcement and that officials should act immediately when a case met the criteria.

He told provincial authorities not to delay an expulsion because of uncertainty over the cost of an air ticket. Provinces could pay first and later arrange reimbursement, he said.

"If their conduct is undesirable, there is only one option: leave. That is all," Anutin said, adding that appeals would not be a problem.

He said keeping offending foreigners in Thailand for legal proceedings could leave the authorities responsible for food, water and accommodation, whereas deportation would remove them from the country.

Focus on land, nominees and illegal work

Anutin ordered closer monitoring of offences involving foreign nationals, including the use of Thai nominees, landholding, fraudulent business activity, working without permits and using Thailand as a base for crime.

He said the cases did not concern one nationality alone, referring to foreign nationals from Asia, the Middle East, Central Asia, Europe and Africa.

The prime minister also told governors to investigate premises displaying signs barring Thai people from entering. Thai people should generally be able to enter establishments across the country, he said, with private residences the exception.

Even then, he said a private homeowner should not display a sign saying Thai people were not welcome. Anyone prepared to erect such a sign should face closer scrutiny for other possible offences, he added.

Religious sites and cemetery request

Anutin also raised concerns about foreign nationals establishing religious sites without approval, saying such places must respect Thai society and culture.

Referring to a recent request to establish a private cemetery, he said: "If they are going to die, they should go die back home, not here."

He also said a business licensed as a restaurant could not operate a religious site inside the premises. Thailand remained willing to welcome tourists and investors where the relationship benefited both sides, he said, but spending money in the country did not give anyone the right to exploit others or carry out illegal activities.

IMG_3110.jpeg

Picture courtesy of Khoasod

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

18 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Some of the high profile Thai company nominee cases in the media, involve foreigners holding a significant parcels of land, looking to carve it up, for profit.

I can see the Thai developers requesting the raids / arrest / deportation in order to make the land available to them for development, thus profits.

So, the foreigner ties up his capital for years, sometimes decades, takes all the risk on whether the land would become desirable in the future, and then the Thai developers forcibly "acquire" the land, make all the profit, and the foreigner is deported.

Similarities to Zimbabwe, under Mugabe.

Yes, I can easily see that scenario too - it's quite likely and might even have been the driving factor influencing Anutin from the get-go.

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Foreigners engaging in physical assault or severe intimidation against locals

Ok, so, assault meets one of the criteria, which we knew was the case.

Also, of course the allegations must be investigated, charges laid, and the matter put before a court, but Thailand being Thailand, for a price, I am sure it was all a misunderstanding, with the foreigner paying his way out of it, rather than rolling the dice with the Thai judicial system and risking deportation.

Even if not charged with assault, intimidation is a very broad definition.

Can't you see how this can be used to get a quick baht out the the ex foreigner boyfriend, with the police joining in for their cut?

Imagine sitting in a police station and having a police officer say to you "If you pay 100,000 baht your girlfriend forget everything, so no charges, no court, no lawyer, no visa problems, no deportation, and you free to leave. We take Visa card, bank transfer, and cash." 😂

How many would pay the money????

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, ronnie50 said:

Yes, I can easily see that scenario too - it's quite likely and might even have been the driving factor influencing Anutin from the get-go.

I think throwing out a few drugged up and / or drunk foreigners for behaving badly is just a smoke screen for the real agenda, going after foreigner's assets.

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

Imagine sitting in a police station and having a police officer say to you "If you pay 100,000 baht your girlfriend forget everything, so no charges, no court, no lawyer, no visa problems, no deportation, and you free to leave. We take Visa card, bank transfer, and cash." 😂

But that has always been a potential scenario Its nothing new

8 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

How many would pay the money????

presumably those whose flight home would cost more than 100,000 baht and not many pay that amount for a flight unless flying business class, If one has pi$$ed of somebody to the extent that the scenario you outlined becomes a reality it would be wise to move on anyway So a complimentary flight courtesy of the Thai authorities ain't such a bad thing really is it ?

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Some of the high profile Thai company nominee cases in the media, involve foreigners holding a significant parcels of land, looking to carve it up, for profit.

I can see the Thai developers requesting the raids / arrest / deportation in order to make the land available to them for development, thus profits.

So, the foreigner ties up his capital for years, sometimes decades, takes all the risk on whether the land would become desirable in the future, and then the Thai developers forcibly "acquire" the land, make all the profit, and the foreigner is deported.

Similarities to Zimbabwe, under Mugabe.

Not similar at all, those holding large parcels of land via nominee based companies new exactly what they were doing and knew full well it was illegal. Few tied their money up in worthless farmland, and even if they did, well hello! its still illegal They gambled and lost , not an uncommon scenario, its a far cry from simply upsetting an ex partner and much easier to prove, They deserve no better treatment than an overstayer

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
21 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

I think throwing out a few drugged up and / or drunk foreigners for behaving badly is just a smoke screen for the real agenda, going after foreigner's assets.

They don't need a smoke screen to go after illegally held assets drunk brawling tourists are unlikely to have any assets here, Those who do have legally held assets need to behave themselves and not upset people . I have no assets and even I can manage that, in real life at least, if not on here Then again those I upset on here are unable to deport me too

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

But that has always been a potential scenario Its nothing new

Deportation is now on the table.

13 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

presumably those whose flight home would cost more than 100,000 baht and not many pay that amount for a flight unless flying business class, If one has pi$$ed of somebody to the extent that the scenario you outlined becomes a reality it would be wise to move on anyway So a complimentary flight courtesy of the Thai authorities ain't such a bad thing really is it ?

What about those with a property here, or a business?

There is no complimentary flight. One's own embassy will not even pay for a deportation flight.

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

They don't need a smoke screen to go after illegally held assets drunk brawling tourists are unlikely to have any assets here, Those who do have legally held assets need to behave themselves and not upset people . I have no assets and even I can manage that, in real life at least, if not on here Then again those I upset on here are unable to deport me too

You missed the point.

Front page news is the authorities deporting drugged up / drunk foreigners behaving badly, which shows the policy is working, and in general, the Thai's are happy it's happening.

Behind the scenes, raid after raid on Thai nominee companies, seizing the the assets of foreigners, repelling foreign investment, and tanking the property market.

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Not similar at all, those holding large parcels of land via nominee based companies new exactly what they were doing and knew full well it was illegal. Few tied their money up in worthless farmland, and even if they did, well hello! its still illegal They gambled and lost , not an uncommon scenario, its a far cry from simply upsetting an ex partner and much easier to prove, They deserve no better treatment than an overstayer

I see your point, and many share your lack of sympathy.

Thailand's been sitting on this ace up their sleeve for decades. It's interesting that they pull the trigger on it in 2026, when tourism, and the their economy, is not going so well.

I wonder what else they have install. Raising the 800k, a tax clearance certificate at extension time, who knows?

Get the popcorn. It's going to be interesting watching the Thai's try to dig themselves out of the hole they are in, but one thing's for sure, there will be no free passes for farang. 🙂

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

You missed the point.

Front page news is the authorities deporting drugged up / drunk foreigners behaving badly, which shows the policy is working, and in general, the Thai's are happy it's happening.

I must have missed the front page too, how many "drugged up / drunk foreigners behaving badly " have been deported so far ? None as far as I know What part of what policy is "working"

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member

14 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

There is no complimentary flight. One's own embassy will not even pay for a deportation flight.

So you must have missed this bit...

On 9/18/2026 at 3:44 AM, Georgealbert said:

He (anutin) told provincial authorities not to delay an expulsion because of uncertainty over the cost of an air ticket. Provinces could pay first and later arrange reimbursement, he said.

On 9/18/2026 at 3:44 AM, Georgealbert said:

He said keeping offending foreigners in Thailand for legal proceedings could leave the authorities responsible for food, water and accommodation, whereas deportation would remove them from the country.

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

I wonder what else they have install. Raising the 800k, a tax clearance certificate at extension time, who knows?

Raising the 800k whilst problematic to those on a budget would hardly benefit any Thais As far as Taxes goes well hardly ideal for anybody but its no surprise , after all there is nothing more certain , other than death as the saying goes

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member

21 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

What about those with a property here, or a business?

On 9/18/2026 at 3:44 AM, Georgealbert said:

Anutin ordered closer monitoring of offences involving foreign nationals, including the use of Thai nominees, landholding, fraudulent business activity, working without permits and using Thailand as a base for crime.

as you can see he's got it all covered , note the use of the words " nominees" and "fraudulent" for context

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

as you can see he's got it all covered , note the use of the words " nominees" and "fraudulent" for context

So, they are arrested, charged, relieved of their asset/s, and deported, or pay up large to avoid legal proceedings / deportation, and even then, probably still have their asset/s seized. Is that not the point I am making?

Bday Prang Star Member

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
(edited)
2 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:

So, they are arrested, charged, relieved of their asset/s, and deported, or pay up large to avoid legal proceedings / deportation, and even then, probably still have their asset/s seized. Is that not the point I am making?

Sounds fair enough to me, What else should happen to the assets of those involved in criminal activities or fraudulent business practices? A pat on the back and the freedom of their city / province ? What happens to those convicted of similar offences in you country?

Edited by Bday Prang

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.