Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Thai-Brit Actress Awarded B1m in KBank Scam Case

The Civil Court has ordered Kasikornbank (KBank) to pay 1 million baht in compensation after ruling that the bank failed to detect suspicious late-night transactions linked to a scam that cost Thai-British actress Charlotte Austin 4 million baht in 2024.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The judgment, delivered on Wednesday, relates to a lawsuit filed by Miss Charlotte Co Ltd, the company that manages the Phuket-born actress’s assets and financial interests. The court found that while the bank could not have identified the first transfer as suspicious, it should have recognised two consecutive transfers made after midnight as unusual and implemented stronger safeguards.

Charlotte Austin, then aged 25 and the fifth runner-up in Miss Grand Thailand 2022, became one of Thailand’s first high-profile victims of organised scam gangs. On 7 December 2024, she received a video call from a man claiming to be an official from the Department of Special Investigation, who falsely accused her of involvement in money laundering connected to the Stark Corporation scandal.

The scammer instructed her to transfer 4 million baht so authorities could verify her innocence. While being kept on a continuous video call, she completed three transfers through the KBank mobile banking application, including two after midnight.

In May last year, the Criminal Court sentenced four people involved in the scam to prison terms ranging from six to seven years.

Miss Charlotte Co Ltd sought 4 million baht in damages, arguing that KBank had breached its obligations under its deposit agreement by failing to identify clearly unusual, high-risk transactions or issue warnings that could have prevented the losses.

Kasikornbank argued that its fraud prevention and transaction monitoring systems met industry standards and that the transfers were processed according to its normal detection criteria.

The court ruled that the initial 2 million baht transfer, made at 5pm, appeared to be a normal transaction and could not reasonably have been identified as fraudulent. However, it found that the second and third transfers, totalling 2 million baht and made consecutively after midnight, should have triggered stronger monitoring and intervention by the bank.

The court also concluded that Charlotte Austin had been negligent by transferring money to the scammers, and ruled that responsibility for the losses should be shared equally between the parties. As a result, KBank was ordered to pay 1 million baht in compensation, together with annual interest of 5% from 8 December 2024, reimburse court fees proportionate to the successful claim, and pay 20,000 baht in legal costs.

Manager Online reported that Lawyer Nitithorn “Lawyer James” Kaewto said the ruling establishes an important precedent for businesses in the entertainment industry and members of the public seeking to hold financial institutions accountable for their handling of suspicious transactions, particularly those occurring late at night. The judgment is also consistent with the amended emergency decree introduced in April 2025, which requires responsibility for financial fraud losses to be shared according to each party’s level of negligence.

Join the discussion? image.png

image.png

12 July 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

SAFETY FIRST Star Member

SAFETY FIRST

Advanced Member
(edited)
1 minute ago, JerryM said:

Yes but as noted they woke me up at 3 AM and I was in a daze.

Who leaves their ring on when sleeping?

I thought everyone turned phone to silence before bedtime.

Edited by SAFETY FIRST

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)
10 minutes ago, Explorator en Action said:

I just hang up on all of them, once in a while, a legitimate one will call back - but SSA will NEVER call you for anything.

Re: therabove:

Who leaves their ring on when sleeping?

I thought everyone turned phone to silence before bedtime.

Every now and then I would forget and that was one of those times.

And for whatever entertainment I have provided for you fellas, what I did just predated the 2017 Equifax when about 150 million ss #'s were breached anyway. And there was no untoward financial activity on my accounts from either of those events.

Edited by JerryM

Reddavy Gold Member

Reddavy

Advanced Member
On 7/11/2026 at 11:08 PM, SABloke said:

It's farcical indeed. She transferred the money herself, it's not like her credit card was illegally used. Also, since she transferred out of her own volition, why would the bank be liable? Finally, would you transfer 4 million to a random person if you knew you had no involvement in what that person was talking about? Something doesn't add up...

A fool and their money Easley parted 🤷🏼

Sigmund Gold Member

Sigmund

Advanced Member

Very nice. But had it been the average Joe Soap or Somchaï who was scammed, would the system be that zealous to refund the victims ?

Jonathan Swift Gold Member

Jonathan Swift

Advanced Member

This is why banks have become more strict with foreigners

wensiensheng Platinum Member

wensiensheng

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Sigmund said:

Very nice. But had it been the average Joe Soap or Somchaï who was scammed, would the system be that zealous to refund the victims ?

Well “the system” didn’t refund her. She took the bank to court to obtain reimbursement.

I guess the average person wouldn’t or couldn’t do that. On the other hand, the average person might well not have transferred the money, or been targeted.

geisha Platinum Member

geisha

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

OK,

Accepted, but these types of scams differ to what the poster was referring to, which were, full building facilities with fake officers posing as officials in walk in scam centres.

On a different note, the woman got scammed, but there are plenty out there who are intelligent human beings taken in by these scams that are getting more convincing every day and involve, on many occasions, hi tech.

Although not in her case, I understand.

If in any doubt , call, or go to the bank.

rattlesnake Diamond Member

rattlesnake

Advanced Member

She's lucky she got anything back at all. In France, you get zero: you send the money, you are responsible. The Thai system seems more empathetic.

jacko45k Star Member

jacko45k

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, JerryM said:

Who leaves their ring on when sleeping?

Exactly, let go of the phone and get a good nights rest!

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
44 minutes ago, jacko45k said:

Exactly, let go of the phone and get a good nights rest!

It was a PC computer based SKYPE and I had probably been watching a movie and forgot that timer to turn off the external speakers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.