Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Thai senator proposes 100% foreign ownership

A Thai senator has proposed allowing foreign investors to own 100% of businesses they fully fund, arguing that the change could tackle nominee companies, grey capital and corruption. Senator Prathum Wongsawat raised the idea during a Senate meeting on September 1.

Prathum also suggested that Thailand could introduce investment thresholds allowing overseas investors to qualify for residency or even Thai citizenship.

Ownership rules and nominee risk

Prathum told the Senate that Thailand benefits from foreign investment, but questioned rules which generally limit foreign ownership to 49%, requiring Thai shareholders to hold the remaining 51%.

She said earlier efforts to address nominee businesses and grey foreign capital had failed to deal with the underlying causes. According to Prathum, loopholes in Thai law create opportunities for wrongdoing involving foreign investors and Thai officials seeking illicit benefits.

She argued that some businesses use nominee arrangements despite being funded entirely by foreign investors. In such cases, she said, an investor providing all the capital is unlikely to willingly hand over control of the company.

Prathum said the restrictions can push some foreigners towards Thai nominees or other attempts to bypass the law, including the use of false Thai identities and addresses, so they can operate businesses in Thailand.

She argued that these practices can contribute to grey capital, tax avoidance and opportunities for officials to seek illicit payments.

Drawing on her own investment experience in Russia, Prathum said foreign investors there could own shares in line with the full amount they had invested.

Her proposed reform would make ownership correspond to the proportion of capital invested. Under that model, a foreigner supplying 100% of a company's funding could hold 100% of its shares.

Residency and citizenship linked to investment

Prathum said legalising full foreign ownership where an investor provides all the capital could turn what she described as "grey capital" into "white capital" from the outset.

She further proposed clear investment thresholds under which foreign investors could qualify for residency or Thai citizenship.

She argued that transparent requirements for investment, residency and citizenship would close loopholes and reduce corruption and extortion, because investors operating legally would be less exposed to demands for illicit payments.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

3 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)
30 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Maybe but in the past a lot of thai quota would be sold via thai company route, that's now closed off

So all the big shot developers with their high-profile lobbyists never saw that coming.

But per my earlier posts what the developers would have to do now is t find 20 senators to put forward the proposal because either it's a great proposal or baby wants a new pair of shoes.

Edited by JerryM

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

Developers need to up the bribes to enable change

It's not just the livelihoods of the developers, it's all the hundreds of different products, businesses, and services that go into building and selling a house, and all the many workers involved with all of them. They all need to unite and lobby. United and organized they would be powerful, and would be listened to.

NewGuy87 Senior Member

NewGuy87

Member
On 9/3/2026 at 6:04 AM, scubascuba3 said:

Makes sense in tourist areas where condo foreign quota fills up quick, if they don't do something foreign investment will continue to plumet

It is a "lose lose" for Thais.

They have to be less xenophobic to stay competative with neighbours in ASEAN for foreign investment, but they don't want to dent their pride and ego.

Anyway, grab the popcorn and enjoy the show. Haha

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)

Well as organized as the developers might be, there already seems to organized groups on record as opposed to the 100% foreign ownership proposition.

Including:

The People’s Party (the successor to the dissolved Move Forward Party with 120 House seats) has maintained a strong stance against expanding foreign property rights and loosening ownership restrictions in Thailand.

Edited by JerryM

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member

The original article and the quotes are about much more than 100% foreigner home ownership. She is calling for an end to the requirement that foreign investors must have a majority Thai partner. That's a major policy shift - one that I am sure will not be endorsed by the Thai government. Thailand's wealthy class rely on the present structure.

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
(edited)
On 9/6/2026 at 2:34 AM, NewGuy87 said:

It is a "lose lose" for Thais.

They have to be less xenophobic to stay competative with neighbours in ASEAN for foreign investment, but they don't want to dent their pride and ego.

Anyway, grab the popcorn and enjoy the show. Haha

That's the way I see it.

Genuine competition in the region now, particularly from Vietnam, who will announce their long stay visa deal in the near future.

The Thai's have painted themselves into a corner. The Thai company nominee ownership of land got out of control, so has the use of agents. To crackdown on these, at a point in time when a neighbor/s is throwing out the welcome mat, puts them in a difficult position.

One one hand, they want to crackdown, clean up the mess of the past, but not lose face, but on the other hand, they don't want this demographic, but more importantly, their money, to leave.

As usual, Thailand can't have farang money, without the farang. They have never understood this.

Yes, grab the popcorn. It's going to be funny watching Thailand compete, when they have never known how to compete, because they have always thought the tourists, and retirees, would just keep coming. Times are changing in South East Asia. 😂 😂

Edited by KhunHeineken

scubascuba3 Star Member

scubascuba3

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Genuine competition in the region now, particularly from Vietnam, who will announce their long stay visa deal in the near future.

It's good that Vietnam lets you know their future plans so you can advise us

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.