Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Thailand rejects full SpaceX ownership of Starlink

Thailand is preparing a framework that could allow Starlink and other foreign satellite operators to offer services in the country, but SpaceX will not be permitted to own a Thai satellite telecommunications operation outright.

The government says its refusal to accept 100% foreign ownership is based on national security, sovereignty and the need for Thai oversight of critical communications infrastructure, rather than opposition to Starlink itself.

Foreign satellite services under Thai oversight

The National Space Policy Committee began work on a new space-sector framework at its first meeting on August 17, including draft "landing rights" rules for foreign satellites seeking to provide services in Thailand.

The policy would separate three areas of authorisation: landing rights, gateway operations and satellite services. The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, or NBTC, has previously proposed replacing a system with an exclusive character with these separate permissions.

Officials say this could allow more consumer and business choice in communications services while retaining controls intended to protect users, competition, national security and Thailand's interests.

The dispute over SpaceX's ownership structure first became public in November 2025. On November 6 that year, Digital Economy and Society Minister Chaichanok Chidchob met SpaceX executives to discuss possible cooperation, Thailand's space policies and the possible introduction of Starlink services.

Chaichanok later said SpaceX wanted to establish its own Thai company without a local partner and retain complete ownership. According to the minister, the company said it would not invest unless it could operate under that structure.

Rules on foreign ownership remain firm

Thailand rejected that condition, saying a wholly foreign-owned operation connected to satellite telecommunications and digital infrastructure could not be accepted under legal and national-security considerations.

The Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) sets conditions for foreign business participation, while industries governed by specific legislation must also comply with those laws. The government is also seeking to prevent nominee arrangements being used to hide foreign control.

Since August 1, 2026, the Department of Business Development has stepped up checks on company shareholders and directors after incorporation, targeting structures where Thai nationals may be used as nominees.

The concerns are heightened by Starlink's use of low-Earth-orbit, or LEO, satellites. Such systems can cover wide areas without conventional terrestrial networks, making them relevant not only to internet access but also to emergency communications and national infrastructure.

Thailand repeated its position during trade talks with the United States. Vice Minister for Commerce Kirida Bhaopichitr said the government did not want a US company to establish a wholly foreign-owned LEO satellite telecommunications business.

"Only one business sector is one that we genuinely do not want the United States to enter through full investment: low-Earth-orbit satellite telecommunications services, because this is a sovereignty issue," she said.

"Essentially, there is only one US company seeking this, which is SpaceX."

Wider plans for Thailand's space economy

The committee is also pursuing a broader strategy covering the space economy, security and technology. This includes surveillance systems, space traffic management, Earth-observation satellite research and a feasibility study for a proposed Thailand Spaceport.

Satellite data could support agriculture, disaster management and PM2.5 monitoring. The government also plans to revise the draft Space Activities Act and update the National Space Master Plan for 2023-2037.

Companies licensed to use Thailand's satellite orbital rights may also be required to provide free capacity for state missions and public services under the State Use and Public Services concept.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

19 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

SiSePuede419 Ruby Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member

national security, sovereignty and the need for Thai oversight of critical communications infrastructure

C'mon. Thailand considers this guy a security risk?

“Starting a company is like eating glass and staring into the abyss of death.” 😄

blaze master Diamond Member

blaze master

Advanced Member

I see thailand wishes to stay firmly in the past.

ukrules Star Member

ukrules

Advanced Member
27 minutes ago, Georgealbert said:

Chaichanok later said SpaceX wanted to establish its own Thai company without a local partner and retain complete ownership. According to the minister, the company said it would not invest unless it could operate under that structure.

They should stick to their guns - do not invest in Thailand in this specific case.

ukrules Star Member

ukrules

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

national security, sovereignty and the need for Thai oversight of critical communications infrastructure

C'mon. Thailand considers this guy a security risk?


No, it's about the States ability to censor and control the internet connections and maintain their absolutely huge banned list.

Direct to space circumvents this completely - which is why it will never be allowed without being routed through their 'censor central' db.

Look at the list of countries where SpaceX is not available - it's not a list any self respecting country would ever want to be on.

Yet here we are....

golfho Apprentice Member

golfho

Member

Yes great. Thailand makes its own satellites 😂. Space X is a world company and Siam is irrelevant when it comes to space technology. America should cut them off from the F-15, F-16s also. They can get their technology from big brother China.

jacko45k Star Member

jacko45k

Advanced Member
52 minutes ago, golfho said:

Yes great. Thailand makes its own satellites 😂. Space X is a world company and Siam is irrelevant when it comes to space technology. America should cut them off from the F-15, F-16s also. They can get their technology from big brother China.

I don't think there is much mileage for the USA as a superpower to divest itself of allies, who then move on to China.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member

There's nothing to stop Starlink complying with the same laws that all other foreign companies trading in Thailand easily comply with.

jacko45k Star Member

jacko45k

Advanced Member
Just now, NanLaew said:

There's nothing to stop Starlink complying with the same laws that all other foreign companies trading in Thailand easily comply with.

There might be deterrents, a lot of companies left Thailand with their tails between their legs.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, jacko45k said:

There might be deterrents, a lot of companies left Thailand with their tails between their legs.

A lot? Or some where their market focus changed or better opportunities, economies and profits arose elsewhere?

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

The government says its refusal to accept 100% foreign ownership is based on national security, sovereignty and the need for Thai oversight of critical communications infrastructure, rather than opposition to Starlink itself.

While that is certainly a reasonable argument by the government - why should it allow Musk to have all that info in his total control - my own guess is that, like any other foreign capitalist venture proposed for Thailand, it can't go ahead unless one of the oligarch families gets its nose in the trough.

BritManToo Star Member

BritManToo

Advanced Member

Not sure how they could stop him.

Best they could do is prevent sales in country.

But they'll still be sold under the counter.

tomazbodner Ruby Member

tomazbodner

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Not sure how they could stop him.

Best they could do is prevent sales in country.

But they'll still be sold under the counter.

Those satellites run on specific frequencies with very low power transmitters. They can be easily jammed by ground-based transmitters which can be immensely more powerful.

Sir Dude Gold Member

Sir Dude

Advanced Member

Not a suprise SpaceX wants this as it has learned from the past and doesn't want the Thai partner to do a Carlsberg, Pepsi, or Kingsgate Mining job on them when they want to in the future after they have got what they need.

unblocktheplanet Star Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, ukrules said:


No, it's about the States ability to censor and control the internet connections and maintain their absolutely huge banned list.

Direct to space circumvents this completely - which is why it will never be allowed without being routed through their 'censor central' db.

Look at the list of countries where SpaceX is not available - it's not a list any self respecting country would ever want to be on.

Yet here we are....

Are you pointing out US or Thai censorship? Thailand does not, at present, do any serious blocking.

The real question not, well, why not jump onboard, everybody's doing it. Does Thailand need it? How many areas are not cellphone accessible?

StarLink may be useful in Antarctica, the Tibetan plateau, the Mongolian Steppe and the Siberian taiga but not here.

Or are we just looking to give Leon some free money?

In fact, around 100 countries are awaiting regulatory approval. The rest are in the same situation as Thailand. They don't want foreign ownership over which they have no control. Among them, China, South Africa and much of Sub-Saharan Africa.

The question to ask is, how would it be useful to us?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.