Teenager accuses supposed benefactor of sexual abuse over four years

By Mongkolchaowarat Thangmangmee 
The Nation

 

 

A 17-year-old schoolboy has filed a complaint with the Phitsanulok Dhamrongtham Centre alleging that a man in his 50s had offered to provide him boarding and a scholarship and then coerced him into a sexually abusive relationship over the past four years.

 

The teenager, whose name was withheld due to his age, was then evicted from his home after reportedly refusing the man’s request for sex before he decided to file a complaint, citing a fear for his own safety. 

 

The teenager, who was accompanied by lawyer Sorasak Muthawan to file the complaint, submitted evidence allegedly showing that the man, whose name was being withheld pending an investigation, had subjected him to sexual abuse since he was 13. 

 

The boy said that his father had died and his mother was working in another province so he had been left to stay with an elderly woman whom he was unrelated to. 

 

The complaint states that as a Prathom 6 student, the teenager was addicted to computer games and spent time at an Internet cafe, where he met the man, who offered to provide him housing, personal funds and a scholarship.

 

According to the complaint, the teenager was coerced to engage in sex three to five times a month after accepting the offer. 

 

The complaint said the man was believed to have made similar offers to other boys who did not stay with their parents and had brought three teenage boys to stay overnight in his house and molested them. 

 

The boy said he had eventually refused the man’s sexual advances, resulting in a fight after which he was kicked out of the house. 

 

The teenager then began working at a stall selling rice near a restaurant owned by Sorasak, who said he had overheard the teenager’s friend mocking him about sexual abuse and asked him for details.

 

He added that he believed many boys had been subjected to abuse and offered to help the teenager file a police complaint on October 18. 

 

Muang Phitsanulok Police Station deputy inspector Pol Captain Amnat On-pan, who is in charge of the case, said police had summoned the accused man for interrogation and initially filed a charge of raping a minor under 15, with the teenager’s medical examination results still pending. 

 

The suspect in the case has denied any wrongdoing.

 

Amnat added that teenager’s recent complaint to the Phitsanulok Dhamrongtham Centre was within his rights as he might fear for his safety and wanted related agencies to help provide mental rehabilitation to help him recover from prolonged abuse. 

 

He said police were gathering evidence and would submit the case to the public prosecutor.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30335923

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-1-10

Gee, let's see. How many mia nois could file a complaint against their farangs alleging the farang offered to provide her boarding and a scholarship and then coerced her into a sexually abusive relationship?  And, then further the complaint that no scholarship was provided.

4 minutes ago, smotherb said:

Gee, let's see. How many mia nois could file a complaint against their farangs alleging the farang offered to provide her boarding and a scholarship and then coerced her into a sexually abusive relationship?  And, then further the complaint that no scholarship was provided.

Gee let's see. How many Mia noi were 13 years old and subjected to an extremely painful introduction to sex in the orifice not usually associated with such action . It's illegal in Thailand to have sex with a child under 15 years of age. The man is a serious kiddy fiddler and needs to be stopped. 

 

He didn't like the way he was being reared.

3 minutes ago, greenchair said:

Gee let's see. How many Mia noi were 13 years old and subjected to an extremely painful introduction to sex in the orifice not usually associated with such action . It's illegal in Thailand to have sex with a child under 15 years of age. The man is a serious kiddy fiddler and needs to be stopped. 

 

Not denying that.

6 minutes ago, greenchair said:

It's illegal in Thailand to have sex with a child under 15 years of age.

Unless she is your wife ............

1 hour ago, greenchair said:

extremely painful introduction to sex in the orifice not usually associated with such action

 

ouch, difficult to argue with the voice of experience

 

 

i do not condone sex with minors in the least and it is criminal

 

but orificially speaking, man on man sex is limited to less orifices

3 hours ago, atyclb said:

 

ouch, difficult to argue with the voice of experience

 

 

i do not condone sex with minors in the least and it is criminal

 

but orificially speaking, man on man sex is limited to less orifices

Well orificially one of the women's orifices is specifically designed for the man action, however one of the mans orifices is specifically not designed for the man action and in fact has another purpose. Therefore making the very nature of man to boy action more serious. 

5 hours ago, smotherb said:

Gee, let's see. How many mia nois could file a complaint against their farangs alleging the farang offered to provide her boarding and a scholarship and then coerced her into a sexually abusive relationship?  And, then further the complaint that no scholarship was provided.

From the age of 13?

 

Any bastard doing that deserves gaol.

4 hours ago, MaeJoMTB said:

Unless she is your wife ............

Since he's a boy, I guess it would be hard to infiltrate the wife defence ??

don't think this is a subject to be made fun of.

 

enuf said.

32 minutes ago, KKr said:

don't think this is a subject to be made fun of.

 

enuf said.

Well said KK, That's my thoughts alsp

Just now, GTgrizzly said:

Well said KK, That's my thoughts alsp

Also

 

4 hours ago, atyclb said:

 

ouch, difficult to argue with the voice of experience

 

 

i do not condone sex with minors in the least and it is criminal

 

but orificially speaking, man on man sex is limited to less orifices

".....but orificially speaking, man on man sex is limited to less orifices."

 

That's a hole different subject.

2 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

From the age of 13?

 

Any bastard doing that deserves gaol.

I have neither mentioned age nor paedophilia, simply the possibility of a mia noi making a complaint against their farangs alleging the farang offered to provide her boarding and a scholarship and then coerced her into a sexually abusive relationship?

2 hours ago, greenchair said:

Well orificially one of the women's orifices is specifically designed for the man action, however one of the mans orifices is specifically not designed for the man action and in fact has another purpose. Therefore making the very nature of man to boy action more serious. 

 

 

could you be more specific regarding female orifice because in dating females, experiences have been diverse often per her request

 

a

 

b

 

c

 

etc

 

 

etc

Now here's a sicko deserving a ecig sellers sentence.

2 hours ago, KKr said:

don't think this is a subject to be made fun of.

 

enuf said.

Thank you for speaking up.  Laughing at the sexual abuse of a child is wrong in so many ways, and is a sad indictment of some.

23 minutes ago, smotherb said:

I have neither mentioned age nor paedophilia, simply the possibility of a mia noi making a complaint against their farangs alleging the farang offered to provide her boarding and a scholarship and then coerced her into a sexually abusive relationship?

You have made your comment on a thread dealing with a child alleging sexual abuse. 

 

How else shoukd it be interpreted?

What a brave man this sorasak is. 

Hearing an awful story and getting involved to help this boy. 

If only there were more people like him. 

9 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

You have made your comment on a thread dealing with a child alleging sexual abuse. 

 

How else shoukd it be interpreted?

How about by the words used?

3 hours ago, smotherb said:

How about by the words used?

They were the reason I responded. 

3 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

They were the reason I responded. 

Well, thank you. I was not aware you were so enthralled by my words.

1 hour ago, smotherb said:

Well, thank you. I was not aware you were so enthralled by my words.

Concerned would better describe my feelings.