International members: Why are International members becoming crazier by the years?

Many have all seen the recent thread circulating in the pub criticizing American culture, complete with that unsourced picture of three guys fishing with guns strapped to their waists(a harmless promo ad for constitutional gun rights).

But when you step back and look at the broader global stage, it seems this sense of growing instability and insincerity a "craziness" isn't unique to any single country,it is completely infecting international bodies and global diplomacy.

Look at what just took place at the UN. We watched massive, highly publicized walkouts organized against some leaders, while the room remains largely seated for others with heinous track records.

To see exactly what I mean, watch this video clip of Iranian President Pezeshkian speaking at the UN.

During this speech, Pezeshkian stood at the podium and actively held up a large portrait glorifying the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a man who led a designated state sponsor of terrorism and orchestrated violent regional proxy wars.

While that regime officially admits to only a fraction of its internal violence( black out to News), independent human rights networks and leaked hospital records from the recent massacres indicate that the real death toll of Iranian citizens killed for protesting and domestic dissent has reached 10's of thousands of Iranian citizens.

The U.S. and Israeli reps immediately walked out the moment he started this stunt, but the rest of the chamber sat through it. The very next day, dozens of nations staged a massive, coordinated walkout on Israel's leader, calling their actions a genocide. Meanwhile, the recorded death toll of the Gaza war stands at approximately 77k total fatalities (including over 75,000 Palestinians and over 2,000 Israelis).

*Why does the UN body sit quietly through the glorification of a regime that has killed 10's of thousands of its own citizens recently , yet walks out the next day on a war with a similar casualty count( since the existence of the regime)?

Is global politics just becoming a giant theater of appeasement for the left ? The UN sits there completely silent while a state sponsor of terror brags about a dictator, but then they stage a massive theatrical walkout the next day.

P.S. Just a heads up to anyone replying: I have a lot of accounts on my ignore list. If I don't answer you, it usually means I am seeing the notice: "You've chosen to ignore content by (username) option."

*https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-senior-officials/

The story is about a C span & Times news report

Edited 1 hour ago1 hr by riclag

All the mess would stop if each country first takes care of it's own and does not meddle in other nations issues, or belligerances or whatsoever else.

14 minutes ago, Sigmund said:

All the mess would stop if each country first takes care of it's own and does not meddle in other nations issues, or belligerances or whatsoever else.

That sounds nice in theory every country just minds its own business and the world magically becomes peaceful. But what happens when a dictator is busy slaughtering tens of thousands of his own people and running proxy groups that are killing citizens in dozens of other countries (Oct 7)? Somebody still has to stand up to that. Sitting back and saying "not my problem" just gives the killers a free pass. Looking the other way doesn’t stop the mess. It lets it spread.

Edited 40 minutes ago40 min by riclag

Gamma's thread inspired you to create this one?

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Gamma's thread inspired you to create this one?

No not really , its a International team effort of promoting terror that inspired me. the craziness goes with it .

13 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Gamma's thread inspired you to create this one?

That’s an idiotic thread, why anyone would demoralize themselves by chiming in on it and taking part of the idiocy is beyond me.