1 minute ago, Laughing Gravy said:

OK I will humour you this time.

She isn't an elected member of parliament. if she wants to get involved in politics, stand for a constituent.

She was trying to stop a democratic referendum result-that is weak and for me she is an abysmal person.

She regularly plays the race card, citing that she can't travel on the underground anymore. She probably never did as she is filthy rich.

She stated that she didn't want to have a second referendum but after losing her case she has now admitted she does.

She is all about her nothing else.  Is that good enough!

 

How did she try to stop the referendum result?

 

Her court case was based on ensuring Parliamentary procedure was followed in implementing article 50.

51 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

How did she try to stop the referendum result?

 

Her court case was based on ensuring Parliamentary procedure was followed in implementing article 50.

If you don't know then do some research. I can't be bothered wasting calories typing it for you.

 

I guess you support what she did then.

1 minute ago, Laughing Gravy said:

If you don't know then do some research. I can't be bothered wasting calories typing it for you.

 

I guess you support what she did then.

I have done the research and I know exactly what the case was about.

 

So again, how did she try to stop the referendum vote with the court case?

 

I support anyone's right to ensure that the rules of governance are followed.

10 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I have done the research and I know exactly what the case was about.

 

So again, how did she try to stop the referendum vote with the court case?

 

I support anyone's right to ensure that the rules of governance are followed.

She tried to stop the government triggering article 50. Who the hell does she think she is. If you support that well it says what kind of person you are.  Don't bother replying, you won't get a response back.

3 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

She tried to stop the government triggering article 50. Who the hell does she think she is. If you support that well it says what kind of person you are.  Don't bother replying, you won't get a response back.

No, she tried to ensure parliament triggered article 50 as required by law.