Jump to content

Canine war heroes mistreated by U.S. Army - Pentagon report


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Canine war heroes mistreated by U.S. Army - Pentagon report

By Scot Paltrow

 

800x800 (4).jpg

FILE PHOTO: U.S. soldiers with the 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team 3-1 CAV take a break with their explosives sniffer dog during a major search operation for weapons and insurgents, in a brickyard near the city of Narhwan, about 30km (18 miles) west of Baghdad October 12, 2007. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch/File Photo

 

(Reuters) - They made up a corps of bomb-sniffing dogs that accompanied brigade combat teams on potentially lethal missions, sniffing out roadside bombs in Afghanistan and saving human lives.

 

In return for their combat service, the U.S. Army mistreated these canine heroes when they were discharged from the military, the Defense Department’s Inspector General’s Office said in a report issued on March 1.

 

An investigation was started after soldiers who had handled the dogs complained about the fate of their four-legged saviours.

 

Army personnel who handled them said that once the dogs returned to the United States, some were left in kennels for up to 11 months, mistreated through lack of care and attention, and others may have been put down, according to the report. No screening was done of people who wanted to adopt the dogs.

 

Several soldiers searched for and rescued their dogs from Army kennels, the report said.

 

Army spokesmen did not respond to multiple telephone and e-mail messages seeking comment. Reuters was unable to reach former soldiers who had issued complaints containing accusations of mistreatment of dogs with which they had worked.

 

The dogs served in Afghanistan from 2010 to 2014. The report faulted the Army for ignoring multiple Pentagon rules concerning the handling of dogs serving in the military.

 

“The Army did not use the DOD Working Dog Management system, as required by the Joint Military Working Dog Instruction and Army Regulation 190-12,” the Inspector General said in its report.

 

The report also said that the Army improperly hired a private contractor to provide the dogs, breaking a rule that requires obtaining military dogs from the Air Force’s 341st Training Squadron, responsible for teaching and distributing new active-duty dogs to all of the military services.

 

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-03-03
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, ronrat said:

In the 1990s a contingent from Australia was sent to a tin pot african country as part of a UN team. It was primarily a battalion of infantry plus a small detachment of armourers, medics, and 2 sappers with explosive detection dogs. Upon cessation of the mission and in preparation to go home the commander (Then a LtCol later a General) ordered the dogs be put down to the horror of the 2 handlers. The senior of the 2 got to a telephone and rang his girlfriend who was working in the office of a well known Australian current affairs program in Sydney. He told her they were going to shoot his dog.

 

The girl told her bosses and the next night they ran a piece about brave military dogs and ambushed the Defence Minister with "Any truth in the rumour that the Australian Army is going to destroy perfectly useful and healthy animals to avoid quarantine costs" The Minister who knew nothing of it saw a potential political disaster and replied. "Absolutely not. Those dogs will come home when they served quarantine conditions". A signal was sent to Africa saying the Minister would personally sack anyone responsible for the death of those dogs.

 

With that a sapper and Lance Corporal and 2 dogs were sent to the British Army quarantine station in England for 6 months. The girlfriend was posted to London by the TV Network and the 3 of them had a great time . When they got back to Sydney they retired the dogs and is permissable adopted them.  I met one of them years later. He said the British Army gave them a married quarter and the girlfriend moved in and the other soldier soon found a girlfriend and she move in. They took it in turns to work and feed the dogs and basically spent the whole time playing sport and drinking at the boozer.

Great story!!!! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HerbalEd said:

The army treats it's veterans like dogs, so why would they treat the dogs differently? (Being cynical, of course.)

I don't know what army you are referring to, but the one I know treated the serving soldiers like dogs and completely ignores them after they get out. Being treated like a dog after leaving would be to acknowledge they exist.

Unless one was an officer or senior NCO of course.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I don't know what army you are referring to, but the one I know treated the serving soldiers like dogs and completely ignores them after they get out. Being treated like a dog after leaving would be to acknowledge they exist.

Unless one was an officer or senior NCO of course.

All my former employers ignore me after I left them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...