21 hours ago, Jingthing said:

It's well beyond worrying about what offends "trump" supporters. "trump" himself is a mean spirited potty mouth. Firing someone one day before their pension kicks in is the sure sign of a leader that wants to be more like Erdogan than Lincoln. He deserves no respect at all and in my view decent Americans shouldn't be giving him any. 

 

Trump did not fire him but, hey ho, nothing like a little fact checking to disturb your bias eh?

 
Trump did not fire him but, hey ho, nothing like a little fact checking to disturb your bias eh?

He doesn't have that power. He pressured Sessions to do that. He trashed him on Twitter. He explicitly complained that he was close to pension eligibility underlining the timing. So same difference.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

He doesn't have that power. He pressured Sessions to do that. He trashed him on Twitter. He explicitly complained that he was close to pension eligibility underlining the timing. So same difference.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Actually it was McCabe who did it,by lying and leaking then a committee of his FBI peers recommended firing him. The consensus is the Republicans are launching a campaign to discredit the Mueller investigation.

 They are trying to persuade Sessions or Rosenstien to authorize a second special counsel,instead of the IG,which will be able to have prosecutable power to confront those Obama Admins FBI ,DOJ and other Intel heads,that have left.They want those fisa warrants released. They have new text released by the IG on those FBI agents that were bias toward PT. Some of those text  mention one of  Judge’s that  Recused himself From Michael Flynn Case,which could further damage the  FBI, DOJ.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/19/judges-recusal-michael-flynn-case-damages-fbi-doj/

Edited March 21, 20188 yr by riclag

3 hours ago, riclag said:

What's your point?

That your arguments are fruitless.

Then there is the stuff that has been happening post-inaugaration.  Mueller is investigating all things DT, not just those few incidents that happened prior to the election (which the press gives the impression that this is what it's all about), it is an ongoing case.  Anyone with any sense who had a history of such shady dealings would have known better than to put themselves in a position to be scrutinized to such a degree, either by law enforcement or the press.  This is probably why his wife wept when the election results came on.  Mueller is one cool customer, giving DT enough rope....

 

And don't forget he was caught passing classified info to the Russians; for those who care to look this up it was on the day he told the two Russians (Kisliak (sp?) and Lavrov) that he "got rid of that nut case Comey" and then took them into Oval Office, no Americans allowed, but the Russian press was.  Later on, the U.S. press quietly revealed that a code word referring to something that was classified was given to DT, then US intelligence intercepted that word while snooping on the Russians.  The US can't act on it as such because it would reveal their own spying mechanisms.  You can say that it was right out of John LeCarre's "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" playbook.

 

 

15 minutes ago, bendejo said:

Then there is the stuff that has been happening post-inaugaration.  Mueller is investigating all things DT, not just those few incidents that happened prior to the election (which the press gives the impression that this is what it's all about), it is an ongoing case.  Anyone with any sense who had a history of such shady dealings would have known better than to put themselves in a position to be scrutinized to such a degree, either by law enforcement or the press.  This is probably why his wife wept when the election results came on.  Mueller is one cool customer, giving DT enough rope....

 

And don't forget he was caught passing classified info to the Russians; for those who care to look this up it was on the day he told the two Russians (Kisliak (sp?) and Lavrov) that he "got rid of that nut case Comey" and then took them into Oval Office, no Americans allowed, but the Russian press was.  Later on, the U.S. press quietly revealed that a code word referring to something that was classified was given to DT, then US intelligence intercepted that word while snooping on the Russians.  The US can't act on it as such because it would reveal their own spying mechanisms.  You can say that it was right out of John LeCarre's "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" playbook.

 

 

"McMaster: It was 'wholly appropriate' for Trump to share intelligence with Russians"

"Speaking to reporters at the White House, H.R. McMaster called Trump's conversation “consistent with the routine sharing of information” between the president and a foreign power".

 

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-mcmaster-it-was-wholly-approrpriate-1494951421-htmlstory.html

Edited March 21, 20188 yr by riclag

2 hours ago, riclag said:

"McMaster: It was 'wholly appropriate' for Trump to share intelligence with Russians"

"Speaking to reporters at the White House, H.R. McMaster called Trump's conversation “consistent with the routine sharing of information” between the president and a foreign power".

 

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-mcmaster-it-was-wholly-approrpriate-1494951421-htmlstory.html

Spin - the true story...

 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/horrified-israeli-intel-officials-were-shouting-at-us-counterparts-over-trump-leak/

16 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Spin - the true story...

 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/horrified-israeli-intel-officials-were-shouting-at-us-counterparts-over-trump-leak/

ben netanyahu didn't have a problem with it, he is still PT friend and the timesofisreal is a left leaning media source ,so I'll stick with my true story

nice try

Edited March 22, 20188 yr by riclag

2 hours ago, riclag said:

ben netanyahu didn't have a problem with it, he is still PT friend and the timesofisreal is a left leaning media source ,so I'll stick with my true story

nice try

So you prefer the white house information to justify itself over 3rd party information.

Only reason for that can be that the 3rd party information doesn't suit your ideas.

Edited March 22, 20188 yr by stevenl

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So you prefer the white house information to justify itself over 3rd party information.

Only reason for that can be that the 3rd party information doesn't suit your ideas.

When did this happen  Aug 2017. The President has total executive privilege  according to the Constitution to share intel. Leaks have haunted every Admin,where is the outrage by left over the  illegal leaks of classified intel ..

ben netanyahu didn't have a problem with it, he is still PT friend and the timesofisreal is a left leaning media source ,so I'll stick with my true story
nice try

Times of Israel is most certainly NOT left leaning source! Perhaps you're thinking of Haaretz.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

22 hours ago, Jingthing said:

He doesn't have that power. He pressured Sessions to do that. He trashed him on Twitter. He explicitly complained that he was close to pension eligibility underlining the timing. So same difference.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

 

But that doesn't fit the facts that you claim to always know.  It was an INTERNAL FBI investigation that found he had lied and, although Trump was ecstatic,  this was nothing to do with him. If he thinks he has been 'wronged' let him APPEAL and let's see.  You can't go, but you do, bending facts to suit your political agenda.

5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Times of Israel is most certainly NOT left leaning source! Perhaps you're thinking of Haaretz.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

I'm tired of your comments toward me,my source says left leaning, besides BN never denounced PT .I don't care  to hear  your further deflections.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/

Edited March 22, 20188 yr by riclag
wrong word

I'm tired of your comments toward me,my source says left leaning, besides BN never denounced PT .I don't care  to hear  your further deflections.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/

I don't care about your lack of rest. Post B. S. and you invite pushback. An online poll? Worthless.

"According to co-founder David Horovitz, The Times of Israel is intended to be apolitical and not "have any political leanings."[" wiki

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app