ok this will be long... but here we go There aren’t really “unanswered questions” here mostly claims with answers that conspiracy sites reject. The towers did not simply collapse from ordinary office fires. Large airliners struck them at high speed, severed and damaged structural columns, stripped fireproofing from the steel and started fires across multiple floors. Steel does not have to melt; when heated, it loses strength and stiffness. NIST concluded that the damaged floors and columns eventually failed, initiating a progressive collapse. Its investigation included photographs, videos, structural plans, computer modeling and nearly 1,200 interviews. They also did not fall neatly “into their own footprints.” Debris was thrown over a wide area and severely damaged or destroyed several surrounding buildings. More than a million tons of debris were removed, examined and sorted—much of it at Fresh Kills landfill. That is where the desks, filing cabinets and other contents went. Building 7 was not hit by an airplane, but it was struck by debris from the North Tower, suffered structural damage, and burned uncontrolled for almost seven hours because the water supply to its sprinklers was impaired. NIST found that heat expansion caused a key floor connection to fail, leading to progressive internal collapse. The roof structure and penthouse began failing before the exterior came down. No blast sequence or other evidence of controlled demolition was found. NIST’s WTC 7 investigation The statement that no steel building has ever collapsed from fire is also false. The Plasco steel-framed high-rise in Tehran collapsed following a fire in 2017, and the Wilton Paes de Almeida high-rise in São Paulo collapsed during a fire in 2018. The supposed “impossible maneuvers” were not aerobatics. The hijackers had received flight and simulator training; several held FAA pilot certificates. Hani Hanjour was considered a poor small-aircraft pilot by some instructors, but that does not make turning and descending a Boeing already in flight impossible. Military exercises were indeed scheduled that morning, as they routinely were. The exercises were stopped once the real attacks became apparent. Their existence isn’t evidence that the attacks were simulated or permitted and recordings show the FAA and military trying often confusedly and unsuccessfully to locate the hijacked aircraft. 9/11 Commission report The insurance story is misleading. Silverstein completed the enormous WTC lease in July 2001 and was contractually required to insure it. Terrorism coverage was hardly suspicious after the same complex had already been bombed in 1993. The five so-called “dancing Israelis” were detained and investigated. Authorities found immigration violations and deported them, but no evidence that they knew about or participated in the attacks. The BBC did mistakenly announce Building 7’s collapse early. Reuters had distributed an incorrect report while firefighters were already expecting the badly damaged building to collapse. A confused live-news report during an unprecedented disaster is not evidence the event was scripted. Explanation of the BBC error A hijacker’s passport was recovered, but it wasn’t “indestructible.” It was apparently blown out of the aircraft before the tower collapsed and found on the street. Lightweight paper surviving while heavier objects are destroyed is unusual, not physically impossible and passports and identification belonging to other hijackers were found in luggage, vehicles and the other crash sites. Firefighters reported hearing “explosions,” but that word describes a sound, not necessarily demolition charges. In burning, collapsing skyscrapers there were transformers, fuel tanks, elevator machinery, pressurized equipment and floors failing. A controlled demolition would require extensive preparation, access to thousands of structural components and a recognizable timed blast sequence none of which was documented. Finally, the Stairwell B survivors and Pasquale Buzzelli’s remarkable survival aren’t evidence against the collapse. People sometimes survive catastrophic collapses because reinforced sections or pockets remain intact. Their survival was extraordinary, but it doesn’t demonstrate explosives. Suspicion is not evidence. To establish a false flag, you would need positive evidence of who planted explosives, how they gained months of unnoticed access, detonation hardware, blast patterns, explosive residue and credible participants or documents. A list of coincidences and misunderstood details doesn’t provide that.
Create an account or sign in to comment