Jump to content

Man who pulled gun on driver at Chaengwattana turns out to be anti-corruption official


webfact

Recommended Posts

UPDATE:

NACC executive admits pulling gun on Bangkok cabbie

By NATTHAPAT PHROMKAEW, 
KHANATHIT SRIHIRUNDAJ 
THE NATION

 

THE NATIONAL Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has given a fact-finding committee 15 days to determine why its assistant secretary-general Piset Nakhaphan pulled a gun on a taxi driver at the Chaeng Watthana Government Complex in north Bangkok.

 

Full story: https://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/1063376-nacc-executive-admits-pulling-gun-on-bangkok-cabbie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rhys said:

So he walks away free...

Why shouldn't he? Anyone invovled in fighting corruption in thailand would expect threats on their life. Having a firearm to protect one's life is a basic human right. In this incident no one was hurt. So a civil society would let him walk free.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2018 at 11:13 AM, billd766 said:

 

Actually having a firearm is NOT a basic human right. In most western countries you have to have a damn good reason to carry a gun. You need a permit and extensive training before being allowed to carry one, and should you ever try to pull a stupid stunt like this idiot did, you would be disarmed, forcibly if necessary. The weapon would be taken away from you, you would be taken to court, fined heavily and jailed.

 

PS Billions of people around the world never have the need for a personal weapon, so why was this idiot allowed to carry one?

Wai-able Hi-so position and salary...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thai society is very hierarchical. Foreigners don't understand Thainess very well. Jungle law in LOS where registered and unregistered guns are everywhere. Be safe guys.. Don't get the many tigers out there angry.. You are being warned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2018 at 1:03 AM, Time Traveller said:

Why shouldn't he? Anyone invovled in fighting corruption in thailand would expect threats on their life. Having a firearm to protect one's life is a basic human right. In this incident no one was hurt. So a civil society would let him walk free.

 

How does anyone come to think this way? 

 

"Why shouldn't he?" (Walk free) - How was his life threatened? He brought the whole incident on himself by acting unhinged. He most certainly is not fit to drive a car let alone carry a gun. 

"Having a firearm to protect one's life is a basic human right." - No it is not. Being able to go about your normal daily business without worrying that the next clown you meet may want to hurt you with a gun is though. Guns are only good at ending lives they rarely save lives.

"In this incident no one was hurt. So a civil society would let him walk free." - The UK is a civil society and if this happened here armed police would hunt him down and throw the book at him. A society that thinks it is OK to pull out a gun and threaten someone for driving slow (assuming that is all it was about) is in need of a big shake up. Would it be OK to pull a gun out in Tesco if the cashier was too slow?

Do you point a gun at a slow waitress in a restaurant? 

Thinking like this is how you end up with the carnage that goes on in the USA. How a great country like that has come to not care about mass shootings in schools and other places is incredible.

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...