Change tack or face defeat, Brexit critics tell British PM May

[webfact]

Change tack or face defeat, Brexit critics tell British PM May

By Elizabeth Piper

 

FILE PHOTO: Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May is seen after the ASEM leaders group photo opportunity during a summit in Brussels, Belgium October 19, 2018. REUTERS/Toby Melville/File Photo

 

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Theresa May was under growing pressure on Sunday to change her plan for Britain to leave the European Union to avoid defeat in a parliamentary vote.

 

With both Britain and the EU suggesting an agreement is close, eurosceptic lawmakers and a leading member of a small Northern Irish party that props up her Conservative government made new threats to vote against the terms of the deal she is working on with Brussels.

 

The vote in parliament, most likely to come later this year, is gearing up to be the biggest showdown in the lengthy negotiations to leave the EU, Britain's biggest shift in foreign and trade policy in more than 40 years.

 

May, who was attending a ceremony to mark 100 years since the end of World War One, found some support from ministers in her cabinet, but it would be hard for her to ignore the growing calls to change tack after a minister resigned and Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party threatened to rebel.

 

"If the government makes the historic mistake of prioritising placating the EU over establishing an independent and whole UK, then regrettably we must vote against the deal," Steve Baker, a leading eurosceptic and former minister, wrote alongside the DUP's Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson in the Sunday Telegraph newspaper.

 

The main battleground is over a so-called backstop to prevent the return of a hard border between the British province of Northern Ireland and EU-member Ireland, something that would only come into force if a deal on future ties cannot guarantee the type of frictionless trade needed to keep it open.

 

DEPTH OF ANGER

Fears that proposals would mean keeping Britain inside the EU's customs union indefinitely or that Northern Ireland would have to accept different rules and regulations to the rest of the United Kingdom have focused opposition to May's deal.

 

Eurosceptics have long criticised May's proposals, but it was the resignation of Jo Johnson, the remain-voting younger brother to Brexit campaign leader Boris Johnson, that highlighted the depth of anger over her plans.

 

Many say May's desire to prioritise free flowing trade of goods with the rest of Europe will make Britain little more than a "rule taker", unable to break free of Brussels' decisions.

 

Comments by Education Minister Damian Hinds will also do little to temper those concerns. He told the BBC Britain could not push for a deal giving London the sole right to say when it was ready to leave any backstop arrangement.

 

"The prime minister has to negotiate something which is negotiable with the other side as well as working for people here," Hinds said.

But May did find some support. Both he, and the eurosceptic leader of the lower house of parliament, Andrea Leadsom, said they supported the prime minister.

 

"I mean to support the prime minister to get a Brexit that works for the United Kingdom and the EU, keeps our country together and delivers on the referendum," said Leadsom, who some media reported was considering quitting her post.

 

She said she did not expect further resignations, adding: "I do urge colleagues to support the prime minister. We are at a very difficult stage ... but it is a negotiation, so what we have to do is to hold our nerve and keep negotiating."

 

(Reporting by Elizabeth Piper; Editing by Janet Lawrence)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-11-12

 

[mfd101]

Living the dream. Unpalatable choices on all sides.

[Ulic]

Hard Brexit, short-term (5-10 years) lumps for long-term gains. Who knows, with Italy, Greece Poland, Czech Republic and other issues the EU may shift to a more UK position. A free trade agreement without the other nonsense. 

[grumpy 4680]

   Out means Out,  The UK has to quit Brussels. The EU. as we know it today was created only for the benefit of politicians and not for us, 

[dunroaming]

I really don't know what is going to happen next.  May's proposed deal will be rejected by MPs and by the EU.  Then what?

 

It's all very well to keep saying we are leaving but it is all about the fallout from that.

 

4 hours ago, Ulic said:

Hard Brexit, short-term (5-10 years) lumps for long-term gains. Who knows, with Italy, Greece Poland, Czech Republic and other issues the EU may shift to a more UK position. A free trade agreement without the other nonsense. 

It's fair enough talking about maybes but nobody knows what deal is going to be struck.  Ulic says 5-10 years lumps for long term gains but he has nothing to base that on apart from wishful thinking.  Of course he may be right but I don't want my countries future based on maybes.