Deadly Narathiwat temple attack a war crime, says HRW

[rooster59]

Deadly Narathiwat temple attack a war crime, says HRW

By The Nation

 

 

Human Rights Watch on Saturday said the deadly attack on civilians in a place of worship in Narathiwat province is a war crime.

 

Separatist insurgents attacked Rattanaphab temple in Sungai Pai district on Friday and killed two monks, including the temple’s abbot.

 

“The ghastly attack on Buddhist monks by insurgents in Thailand’s deep south is morally reprehensible and a war crime, and those responsible should be held to account,” said Brad Adams, HRW Asia director. 

 

“The insurgents’ 15-year campaign of deliberately attacking Buddhist and Muslim civilians can’t be justified.”

 

Phra Khru Prachote Rattanarak, the abbot of the temple and also chief monk of the district, was shot at close range and died instantly at the site.

 

 

Witnesses told Human Rights Watch they saw armed men arrive at the temple on motorcycles, open fire with assault rifles and then storm inside and shoot the monks at point-blank range. 

 

The attack followed a pattern consistent with other insurgent attacks, and heightened fears in Su Ngai Padi district and other parts of the four southern border provinces. 

 

Thai authorities have instructed all Buddhist monks in Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat, and Songkhla provinces to stay inside temples and cease their daily morning routine of collecting alms.

 

Since the outbreak of armed insurrection in January 2004, Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN) insurgents have targeted Buddhist temples and monks, which they consider emblematic of the Thai Buddhist state’s occupation of ethnic Malay Muslim territory.

At least 23 monks have been killed and more than 20 wounded. 

 

The insurgents have also targeted security personnel assigned to provide monks safe passage to and from temples.

 

The laws of war, also known as international humanitarian law, prohibit attacks on civilians and civilian objects, including houses of worship, or attacks that fail to discriminate between combatants and civilians. 

 

The laws of war provide no justification for insurgent claims that attacks on civilians are lawful because those targeted are part of the Thai Buddhist state or that Islamic law, as they interpret it, permits such attacks.

 

The laws of war also explicitly prohibit tactics frequently used by BRN insurgents, including reprisals and summary executions against civilians and captured combatants, mutilation or other mistreatment of the dead, and attacks directed at civilian facilities. 

 

Human Rights Watch has repeatedly condemned such violations by the insurgents.

 

Despite a peace dialogue between the Thai government and separatist groups under the umbrella of Majlis Syura Patani (Mara Patani), BRN insurgents have continued attacks on civilian targets.

 

“Both Muslims and Buddhists in southern Thailand are caught in the cycle of abuses and reprisals by insurgents and Thai security forces,” Adams said. 

 

“The Thai government needs to prosecute the atrocities by its own forces as well as those by the insurgents if this horrific violence is to stop.”

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30362545

 

The Nation: 

[canopus1969]

Both Muslims and Buddhists in southern Thailand are caught in the cycle of abuses and reprisals by insurgents and Thai security forces

- The same in Burma

 

The Thai government needs to prosecute the atrocities by its own forces as well as those by the insurgents

- Never happen, also the same as in Burma

[seahorse]

No Islam = no problem. 

[hansnl]

As there is no war, officially, this atrocity is a terrorist attack on innocents, consistent with the muslim style of murdering "infidels".

Look for the money stream and for the Iran connection.

[lubfishin]

Amen brother. My Thai wife thinks I am a total racist for my disdain and hate towards these Muslim scum terrorist who kill innocent people all over the world. I tried to explain to her that Islam is not a race it is a religion. How can I be  racist. 

[Stocky]

On 1/20/2019 at 11:33 AM, hansnl said:

As there is no war, officially, this atrocity is a terrorist attack on innocents, consistent with the muslim style of murdering "infidels".

Look for the money stream and for the Iran connection.

Money comes from Saudi Arabia not Iran.

[Hank Gunn]

5 hours ago, Stocky said:

Money comes from Saudi Arabia not Iran.

Comes from both countries. Just depends on who's getting funded. (But I'd agree the Saudi's fund at a higher volume.)