Jump to content

Mueller report finds no evidence that Trump campaign colluded with Russia - U.S. Justice Department


webfact

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, usviphotography said:

It is "suspicious" that one of the world's largest property developers had been looking in to building a tower in Europe's largest city? And Trump said he had no business in Russia because it was the TRUTH. Trump has been looking in to getting in to Europe's largest city since the early 80's. He never did it because he didn't feel the right deal existed. That never changed. A hypothetical project that is never acted upon is not "business in a country". Trump has hundreds if not thousands of hypothetical deals swirling around him at any given time. You are not "doing business" until you actually start doing business. 

Yes, it is suspicious that Trump was negotiating the property deal while insisting he had no business interests in Russia and significantly modifying the Republican party platform for the convention. 

 

How do you know Trump has no business in Russia?  Because Trump, the serial liar, said so?

 

Trump's refusal to follow precedent and reveal his income taxes, open his finances to scrutiny, and put his holdings in a blind trust makes his actions suspicious.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

That's one.  In this case, he was using the term "treason" broadly:

 

" "I called his behavior treasonous which is to betray one's trust and to aiding and abet the enemy and I stand very much by that claim." "

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

 

"Trump didn't do what I wanted him to do, so that makes the Russian Collusion charge legitimate. Hes a meanie" 

 

Click play in the video below. Its for you. 

 

 

 

He didn't do what is expected of Presidential candidates and Presidents.

 

I don't waste time on Twitter and YouTube nonsense.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

wait, you said no serious person said it, then ask for examples, they were provided, then you redefine

your terms.

 

oh when a second person back up the claim, that would be 2 examples.

 

take the loss and move on.

No, I said he used the term "treason" broadly.  Please pay attention.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

 

He wont though. There are loads of mainstream editorials about trump and treason as well, but I didn't feel like giving the dude what he was asking for because hes of course acting in bad faith. 

"There are loads of...." 

 

I'll put that on my list of BS alerts, along with "I saw on the internet...", "I heard in a bar...", and "Everybody knows..."

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

or prostitutes peeing ...oh wait...that was accepted as the dossier was

Even comedians preface that one with "allegedly".  Who has claimed that it was proven to be true?

2 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

you keep digging long enough, there is no way out

Once again, when you have nothing to post, you post a nothing.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off topic posts and replies have been removed. 

 

Inflammatory posts and replies have been removed. 

 

A post replying to a now removed post has been removed. 

 

A post commenting on moderation has been removed. 

Edited by metisdead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Thainesss said:

Title of you first link:  "Is Trump a traitor?"  A question, not an assertion.

 

From your second link: 

 

"Trump is right now, before our eyes and those of the world, committing an unbelievable and unforgivable crime against this country. It is his failure to defend.

The intelligence community long ago concluded that Russia attacked our election in 2016 with the express intention of damaging Hillary Clinton and assisting Trump."

 

Clearly in the opinion of the author Trump's failure to take steps against Russian interference in future elections is treasonous.  I can see his point.

 

Title of your third link:  "Is Donald Trump committing treason?"  A question, not an assertion.

 

Your fourth link is about a tweet by Rob Reiner.  He is an entertainer, not someone to go to for serious commentary.

 

Title of you fifth link:  "Presidential historian: Trump's actions may be 'definition of treason' if he knew about Russian interference efforts"  A qualified possibility, not an assertion.

 

Try to learn the difference between questions, opinions, and assertions.

  • Confused 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Barr needs to stop digging.

 

He’s already on his third letter, the latter two trying to convince us that his first summary letter wasn’t a ‘summary letter’.

 

POUNDSTONE on NPR read the Barr summary of "A Tale Of Two Cities," which is just one line - “Dickens says, it was the best of times.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Thakkar said:

 

POUNDSTONE on NPR read the Barr summary of "A Tale Of Two Cities," which is just one line - “Dickens says, it was the best of times.”

 

I was wondering whatever happened to Paula Poundstone. I thought she was "kinda funny" though a little too tame given her natural sweetness. Not quite "edgy" but she found a way to get the message across in her folksy manner. I wouldn't put her in my top ten of comedy greats but given the dearth of great good comedians these days I think I've been unfair in my appraisal and I'm happy she's still around. I'll check her out again, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎31‎/‎2019 at 12:06 PM, heybruce said:

Trump is not engineering a coup in Venezuela.  At least I hope his handlers won't let him do anything that stupid.

 

Increased sanctions on Russia were forced on Trump by Congress, and he delayed implementation as much as he could.

 

The missiles fired on a Syrian base were for show, and coordinated with Russia in advance to avoid any Russian casualties.

Hmmmmm. Are you for Trump firing missiles that kill Russians and perhaps starting WW3?

I'm all for coordinating with Russia so none of them get killed, as the alternative might be that the human race doesn't have to worry about climate change ever again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...