Jump to content

"Don't take my mum away - who's gonna look after me?", five year old appeals for shoplifting parent


webfact

Recommended Posts

"Don't take my mum away - who's gonna look after me?", five year old appeals for shoplifting parent

 

9pm.jpg

Caption: She needed to steal for her children. Off to the workhouse!

 

A five year old girl begged the police in Samrong, south east of Bangkok, not to take her mother into custody after they went on a shoplifting trip. 

 

The mother, aged 35 from Sisaket, was stopped by security at Imperial World department store. 

 

She had baby milk formula, school shoes and other items worth a total of 8,000 baht. 

 

She told Samrong Neua police that she had four children aged 12,7, 5 and just over a year. 

 

The baby needed milk but she had no money. The shoes were for her five year old as her pair were broken.

 

Her husband had lost his job as a security guard at Suvarnabhumi airport and selling moo ping and chicken on a stick was not enough to keep the family alive. 

 

The police arranged for the little girl to be taken away by the sister of the husband.

 

She said: "Don't arrest my mummy - who is going to look after me?"

 

The shoplifter was charged with theft during the hours of darkness and detained. 

 

Source: Sanook

 

 

thai+visa_news.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-07-29
  • Sad 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Henrik Andersen said:

Sad story in real life and no help from government 

and the same time people feed soi dogs 

what is the world coming to... 

And also at the same time people comment about others feeding soi dogs! At least those feeding soi dogs are actually doing something to help instead of just being a keyboard warrior. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 3
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand that the store can't let people steal from them and go unpunished. Deterrents must be imposed, but I hope those administering any punishment will strongly consider that she was obviously desperate and taking the things to provide for her children. 

 

As for the extra weight a night time crime carries, that shouldn't even be brought into the picture. Obviously, in a store, it make no difference what time of day it is. It's not like she was prowling around on somebody's property. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand that the store can't let people steal from them and go unpunished. Deterrents must be imposed, but I hope those administering any punishment will strongly consider that she was obviously desperate and taking the things to provide for her children. 
 
As for the extra weight a night time crime carries, that shouldn't even be brought into the picture. Obviously, in a store, it make no difference what time of day it is. It's not like she was prowling around on somebody's property. 


I agree about the night time issue... I think IF the fact that it was night in any way facilitated or impacted the crime - like improving the odds of evading detection or apprehension due to darkness- THEN i think there’s merit to an additional charge.... but if the fact it was night had ZERO impact on the crime, then I think the charge really should not apply.





Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see folks  complaining  here about "nanny states" and the like all the time. Hey, a little help vis a vis "unemployment benefit" might be a helpful, humane alternative.

Maybe all the temple donations could be used in part to help a mom with hungry kids. I think "merit" could be a two way street. A little less gold leaf and a little more of Buddha's compassion.

But hey, I know. These are "socialist" ideas, no matter what Buddha and Jesus said.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, thaiguzzi said:

To the "hang her high" brigade.

Not exactly high heeled shoes, brand name shirt and handbag is it.

For a lot of families, the school uniform malarkey is an expensive annual spend.

As for the "hand me down" brigade - no - how do you hand down shirts that have to have a name embroidered in them?

I hope she is not prosecuted and sorts her life out.

Four kids and cant support them - nuff said.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bill Miller said:

But hey, I know. These are "socialist" ideas, no matter what Buddha and Jesus said.

That of course is incorrect as their teachings do not involve use of force. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe they should offer a free snip after 1 or max 2 kids if you are poor

 

no titti milk for baby? it's free and health instead of the corn syrup laden expensive baby formula !!!

 

anyone ever looked at the ingredients ?  soy at young age = gender bender

 

sugar bomb at young age = type 2 diabetes in the making

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Con Peoples Fund said:

And also at the same time people comment about others feeding soi dogs! At least those feeding soi dogs are actually doing something to help instead of just being a keyboard warrior. 

Near me, Yes they live on charity in a nice big house with a swimming pool,plus two other houses in which young couples live rent free,have a new pick up all on charity. They are all falang ! and you are on yer keyboard. your name says it all Con peoples fund.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see this has stirred up a raft of abuse for the poor and unfortunate and I'm wondering what solutions op's would offer if they were in a similar situation given that government help amounts to 300bpm unemployed 800bpm for disabled 800bpm pensioners. I do a bit with the poor here wont say to much but the withering poverty some have to endure is sick beyond belief whilst generals adorn themselves in trinkets LOS or land of shit ????    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tabarin said:

Sad. What confuses me most is that those people with least chances on proper life often manage to get 3-4 kids... Not the brightest idea.

That's because they can't afford a television.  ????????

Edited by nahkit
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stephen tracy said:

I assume that's sarcasm? If not, have you ever actually been to Thailand?

No, it wasn't sarcasm, and yes, I've lived here for 25 years. Perhaps you can come up with a proven example of his assertion, then?  I doubt it, though, just as he couldn't.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2019 at 1:29 PM, SanookTeufel said:

Someone stole and you are upset with them for pressing charges?

If we don't enforce laws people will just disregard them.

It would be nice of them to give it away for her children right? But then every thief has a story as to why they steal, should we just hand out merchandise to everyone who says they need some?

 

Thank you, Inspector Javert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...